He totally stands by his statement that he thinks it's OK to shoot congressmen. And yet people have been reading his "clarification" and saying, "Oh, he was just misunderstood!" No! He wasn't fucking misunderstood! He's advocating exactly the kind of violence that occurred, with the limp-shit "qualification" that you shouldn't shoot civilians (because the people who do shit like this are usually so thoughtful and discriminating). And it's based on the usual dumbfuck, fantasy-land libertarianism, the kind that can't be implemented without, yes, exactly the kind of violence that occurred.