NAOMI WATTS WILL TYPE THINGS FOR J. EDGAR

People are complaining she's playing a secretary? Huh? At this point they're making up stuff to whine about it seems.

But I have to say that I'm strangely unexcited about this movie. I love Eastwood, I love the cast, the period and story are interesting but something just doesn't click.

No, no one is actually complaining. I just like trying to guess what the posts on Jezebel will say when this is released. They must have run about five complaining about women in The Town.

If it actually happend then the feminist's should have nothing to complain about right?

Sarcasm aside the cast is shaping up niceling on this one, looking forward to seeing it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elisabeth Rappe 

No, no one is actually complaining. I just like trying to guess what the posts on Jezebel will say when this is released. They must have run about five complaining about women in The Town.

Oh, I misread you then. I guess my rush to assume irrational behavior from a bunch of feminists does show a bit of misogynism. Or at least misanthropy. Gonna have to work on it. 

I have to agree with you statements regarding Naomi Watts' career choices of late...  They kinda stink.  She's an actress that I really enjoy watching.  She's a good actress, too.  :P  Anyway, I keep hoping to see more great work from her, but she keeps choosing boring roles.  I've actually seen The International TWICE out of Watts-desperation. 

Work with me, Naomi!

That said, I guess it's safe to assume that my ticket for this is purchased, secretarial-status notwithstanding. 

I love Naomi Watts. But she keeps doing serious drama type roles. So much so that she's a little typecast.

Watts was fabulous in FAIR GAME. I certainly wouldn't mind a spy series with her as the lead.