SHERLOCK HOLMOGENIZED: A TITLE OF BORING

Because reworking the title of the BLAIR WITCH sequel is a winning pitch. What a shitty call.

I quite liked the first Downey/Law SHERLOCK ... until I saw the brilliant BBC Cumberbatch/Freeman series and pretty much forgot about what Ritchie was doing.

Still, Jared Harris rules. This title? Eh.

I still think Harris is misdirection casting to cov up the real Moriarty.

I'm really torn on this series.  I thought the first film was dreadfully boring but I like Downey and Law.  It's a movie I wanted to enjoy a lot more than I did.  I hope they get rid of that stupid "Holmes breaks down the fight" device or at least play with around with it. 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather 

I still think Harris is misdirection casting to cov up the real Moriarty.

I would enjoy this quite a bit. But then, I'd also enjoy just Jared Harris.

I don't dislike this title so much as I nothing this title. 

I saw the original on HBO last month and found it to be a bit better than I remembered. They could really step it up Dark Knight style and make this into something a bit greater. Or they could just be solid like the original, and that'd be fine. 

I'll give it a rental as the first was an ok jaunt that coasted on lead charismas. Where this title lacks that certain something, the article title is great. "HOLMOGENIZED"

The title's a snore but the movie could be a worthy romp as much as the last one was. Looking forward most of all to Harris, though I love Merriweather's theory on Harris just being a face figure and not the real Moriarty.