Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
if u like the previous movies this one fits right in..special effects are great plenty of action from begin to end and a great plot
-
This movie was pretty awsome if u like the 80's B horror. Its on Netflix
-
Where the hell are u gonna find gravey flavored condoms in any other movie ...........huh............... I LOVE U TURKEY!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
I was very excited to see the American Reunion movie. I saw American Pie just after college and remembered it was quite funny. Jim, Michelle, Oz, Heather, Stifler reunite for their high school...
-
this is the song to have fun on.
THE HANGOVER: PART II GETS A REALLY SWEATY TRAILER
- The K Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Rabid Anti-Dentite
- offline
- 291 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: Boston
- Reputation: 68
- Select All Posts By This User
I liked The Hangover. I did. I thought the cast had a fun chemistry, I thought it had a perfect amount of bizarreness, it was a fun movie to see with friends, it was quotable. I looked forward to the second because, come on, the same chemistry should be there, and it seems like they know what's up, so it should be enjoyable.
But this. This trailer. It's like they played Mad Libs with the script, and took out all references to Las Vegas. It's like they took the first film and went all MGM Red Dawn on it, only instead of replacing all things Chinese with Korean, they just digitally changed Las Vegas to Taiwan, a tiger to a monkey, and a missing tooth to a tattoo. I knew we were going to get a similar film. I didn't realize we'd get the same film.
- Elisabeth Rappe
- Trader Feedback: 0
- A Lady
- offline
- 454 Posts. Joined 4/2010
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Reputation: 15
- Select All Posts By This User
I liked it too. And I'm with you in daring to think hey, "similar but amusingly different" was a feasible option.
Considering they got going on this before The Hangover actually hit theaters...oh wait, that doesn't mean anything.
- Bucho
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Women sense my power
- offline
- 3,185 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: Somewhere between 2 to 22 hours into the future, aka New Zealand
- Reputation: 443
- Select All Posts By This User
I assume that Heather Graham dumped Stu, not the other way round. Or she died a noble death giving her life to save others in a hail of gunfire.

But this. This trailer. It's like they played Mad Libs with the script, and took out all references to Las Vegas. It's like they took the first film and went all MGM Red Dawn on it, only instead of replacing all things Chinese with Korean, they just digitally changed Las Vegas to Taiwan, a tiger to a monkey, and a missing tooth to a tattoo. I knew we were going to get a similar film. I didn't realize we'd get the same film.
The same film ... but BETTER!
For one, Thailand is about a babillion times better setting than Las Vegas. Films set in Vegas that I like, I like in spite of the setting. I hate Las Vegas. If it wasn't the Mecca of boxing and MMA I'd be happy to see it wiped from the Earth.
For two, the boring dude from the first film is gone.
For three, I like tigers but, c'mon. Monkeys have a shitload* times more personality and screen presence.
For four, a missing tooth is nothing. A face tattoo? SOMETHING!
And for five, Zach gets an awesome haircut.
* Sometimes literally.
- The K Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Rabid Anti-Dentite
- offline
- 291 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: Boston
- Reputation: 68
- Select All Posts By This User
I'll probably end up seeing this and laughing a good amount. But I don't know. I guess I'm just not excited for The Hangover Part III where the gang loses Doug's newborn son on the moon, and they're chased by alien gunmen after they find a baby space squid and Ed Helms realizes he chopped his own arm off.
- HarleyQuinn22
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Power is power.
- offline
- 6,139 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Reputation: 1426
- Select All Posts By This User
All this trailer did was convince me that The Hangover really did not need a sequel.
- Gabe T
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Affording another Klendathu
- offline
- 3,385 Posts. Joined 1/2011
- Location: NYC
- Reputation: 1116
- Select All Posts By This User
I am NEVER onboard a Todd Phillips film until I actually see it, and it ends up actually being funny. Seriously, every movie he does seems to have that slight stench of "you've seen this before" in the marketing and pre-release buzz, and then the movie ends up being way funnier than you could have guessed, usually because of the pacing and performances. So yeah, this was a dumb, unoriginal trailer to a movie that will probably be pretty funny, even though the temptation is to say Todd Phillips makes the same movie every time out.
- Ninhead
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Please remove me from this spam list.
- offline
- 1,170 Posts. Joined 12/2002
- Location: Willoughby, OH
- Reputation: 15
- Select All Posts By This User
This. Even they aren't sure why it's happening again.
- mcnooj82
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Just me...
- offline
- 17,285 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: She works... at the library.
- Reputation: 1862
- Select All Posts By This User
"How could the same shit happen to the same guy twice!?"
Sounds like this could be the Die Hangover II: Die Hangoverer.
So what would Die Hangover With A Vengeance be like?
- BurnInHell
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Your tears give me sustenance.
- offline
- 169 Posts. Joined 3/2011
- Reputation: 12
- Select All Posts By This User
The Hangover was the perfect comedy for today's generation. Insipid, tepid, uninspired trash that barely raised a smirk on my face. Like I said, it was the perfect comedy for the American Idol/Jersey Shore generation of today. That's why it made 300 million. It was soo bland and played soo broad that it appealed to fucking morons across the board, uniting humanity in a web of mediocrity. Fuck you if you liked that piece of shit and double fuck you if you're looking forward to this like a fucking lab rat waiting for a feeder pellet you fucking plebs. We are literally minutes away from ASS THE MOVIE.
- Paul755
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Awww My Groin
- offline
- 4,690 Posts. Joined 8/2001
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Reputation: 36
- Select All Posts By This User
The Hangover was the perfect comedy for today's generation. Insipid, tepid, uninspired trash that barely raised a smirk on my face. Like I said, it was the perfect comedy for the American Idol/Jersey Shore generation of today. That's why it made 300 million. It was soo bland and played soo broad that it appealed to fucking morons across the board, uniting humanity in a web of mediocrity. Fuck you if you liked that piece of shit and double fuck you if you're looking forward to this like a fucking lab rat waiting for a feeder pellet you fucking plebs. We are literally minutes away from ASS THE MOVIE.
Devin? Is this you?
The first one was fantastic and it still holds up quite well. Did it need a sequel...no not really. But all things considered you had to know one was coming. Besides...to me at least it felt like it was originally intended to be the sequel to Old School (Cooper=Vaughn, Galifanakis=Farrell, Helms=Wilson).
As for the trailer, yeah it makes the movie look almost exactly like the original. But I did laugh. Loved the line in the toast "this isn't Stews first marriage, a few years ago there was this whore in Las Vegas."
I'm looking foreward to to it.
- Jesse T
- Trader Feedback: 0
- just for the halibut
- offline
- 302 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Reputation: 12
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah I don't get the backlash. I don't think the first one really broke new ground, but it was funny and never boring. To say it was "broad" is a bit of a stretch.
- Bucho
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Women sense my power
- offline
- 3,185 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: Somewhere between 2 to 22 hours into the future, aka New Zealand
- Reputation: 443
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't know man, I enjoyed it but the scenes with Ken Jeong were broader than Kirsty Alley's thighs.
- FilmNerdJamie
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Allergic to dumbfucks
- offline
- 4,518 Posts. Joined 5/2006
- Location: Somewhere around the moon, New York City and your sister
- Reputation: 395
- Select All Posts By This User
The world needed a new Weekend at Bernie's II.
- Andrew Merriweather
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Secret Shame
- offline
- 5,203 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Reputation: 1792
- Select All Posts By This User
BurnInHell's steppin' up the crazy.
- Evi
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Skip Intro
- offline
- 6,446 Posts. Joined 9/2005
- Location: rape capital of the world
- Reputation: 500
- Select All Posts By This User
What is it with trolls and getting super-hyperbolic?
I'd like to believe that the carbon-copy sequel is an excuse to surprise us and sneak in some subversive humour. But that doesn't seem likely.
- MichaelM
- Trader Feedback: 0
- You only have 14 hours to save the earth.
- online
- 4,987 Posts. Joined 2/2006
- Location: Flyover Country
- Reputation: 1082
- Select All Posts By This User
Maybe PK's alter ego is just feeding the rage now?
- joeypants
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Will you dance with me?
- offline
- 5,872 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User
Considering the first one was such a gimmick comedy, I don't really mind the sort of retread situation going on here. I mean let's face it, you're watching this (if you're inclined) because the performers are funny. Not because of some amazing feat of epic storytelling to rival David Lean or something.
I don't think you can accuse Todd Philips of ever reaching for the stars or anything. The outright crusade of hate against this thing is a bit baffling. But, whatever. I'll have a nice evening with some laughs most likely while other people bite their pillows.
The first one was just a decent comedy that made me laugh a lot but that I probably won't revisit for some time. This will likely be the same. I liked the trailer for what it is.
- Evi
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Skip Intro
- offline
- 6,446 Posts. Joined 9/2005
- Location: rape capital of the world
- Reputation: 500
- Select All Posts By This User

Considering the first one was such a gimmick comedy, I don't really mind the sort of retread situation going on here. I mean let's face it, you're watching this (if you're inclined) because the performers are funny. Not because of some amazing feat of epic storytelling to rival David Lean or something.
Oh come on, how hard would it have been to change things up a bit? Phillips is no Judd Apatow, but he's not a bad comedy writer and this seems below even him. I'm just surprised they went for such an obvious retread when the concept is such an open one.
- DJ Dylan
- Trader Feedback: 0
- The Shield That Guards The Realm of CHUD
-
- offline
- 9,471 Posts. Joined 8/2000
- Location: Asheville, NC
- Reputation: 152
- Select All Posts By This User
So what if it looks a lot like the first movie. The first movie worked really well. I'm actually excited about the sequel.
- joeypants
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Will you dance with me?
- offline
- 5,872 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User
Is it? I mean, to have a sequel to The Hangover (which was a gimmick film), what do you need?
a) they get fucked up/drugged/etc.
b) wake up, can't remember what happened
c) piece everything together in "hilarious" ways
I guess I'm just completely out to lunch on this one. And you know? I don't really care. I just don't know what the hell everyone expected OR why this strikes such an apparent low blow.
- Andrew Merriweather
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Secret Shame
- offline
- 5,203 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Reputation: 1792
- Select All Posts By This User
I think it's the disproportionate excitement about it in some quarters. And that it basically looks like GHOSTBUSTERS II/MEN IN BLACK II - the first film xeroxed into oblivion. The three things you identify as cores of the film could have been bent and twisted into something much funnier than "these guys can't remember a stag do again and there's an animal and a celebrity cameo and a wacky bit of self-abuse from Ed Helms". It's really lazy.
- joeypants
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Will you dance with me?
- offline
- 5,872 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User

I think it's the disproportionate excitement about it in some quarters. And that it basically looks like GHOSTBUSTERS II/MEN IN BLACK II - the first film xeroxed into oblivion. The three things you identify as cores of the film could have been bent and twisted into something much funnier than "these guys can't remember a stag do again and there's an animal and a celebrity cameo and a wacky bit of self-abuse from Ed Helms". It's really lazy.
I certainly can't say it's not lazy. I just didn't expect much, I guess. I mean this seems like exactly the sort of thing Philips does. ESPECIALLY with the rush job it was given.
- Evi
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Skip Intro
- offline
- 6,446 Posts. Joined 9/2005
- Location: rape capital of the world
- Reputation: 500
- Select All Posts By This User
And it seems that almost every single thing that happens in this one has an analog in the first flick. That's why comedy sequels hardly ever work, because people don't bother to look out of the box.
- joeypants
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Will you dance with me?
- offline
- 5,872 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User
I agree. I think the key here is that I'm not one of these people (though I don't know one, I'm sure they're out there) who thinks the first one is the end-all/be-all of comedy films. It was an enjoyable time at the theater. I laughed. Hard. Haven't watched or thought much of it since.
Having said that, I STILL don't get the level of vitriol being aimed at it by people like BurnInHell or certain other writers online. I'd hardly single this film/franchise out as "what's wrong with comedy films today," and that's the only reason I could see taking such steady aim at it like that.
And it really gets absurd when you veer into calling people "morons" for enjoying the first and, *gasp*, willingly wanting to watch this one. This isn't "that film."
- Andrew Merriweather
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Secret Shame
- offline
- 5,203 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Reputation: 1792
- Select All Posts By This User
BurnInHell is like CreepyThinMan's angrier waterbrained cousin, so I'd just ignore what he has to say on the subject.
- MichaelM
- Trader Feedback: 0
- You only have 14 hours to save the earth.
- online
- 4,987 Posts. Joined 2/2006
- Location: Flyover Country
- Reputation: 1082
- Select All Posts By This User
FIFY.
- Ratty
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Save us, Mike Roark!
- offline
- 11,832 Posts. Joined 2/2001
- Reputation: 762
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't see what's so hard about coming up with a slightly different premise using all three actors. There used to be a time when comedy teams would do a slew of movies together where they would play different characters in each and have different locales/premises. That needs to come back. I would think that a totally different comedy that still starred Cooper, Helms and Zach G would do just as well as a blatant retread. At least, I hope so.
- The K Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Rabid Anti-Dentite
- offline
- 291 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: Boston
- Reputation: 68
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah, that was pretty much my complaint about the trailer. I knew we would get The Hangover Part II, I just thought that it was going to be some crazy antics in Thailand, not the exact same antics in Thailand as in the first. Looks funny, but the whole thing leaves a weird taste in my mouth.
- Bucho
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Women sense my power
- offline
- 3,185 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: Somewhere between 2 to 22 hours into the future, aka New Zealand
- Reputation: 443
- Select All Posts By This User
You're talkin' a lot of sense Joey.
- Cameron Hughes
- Trader Feedback: 0
- online
- 3,595 Posts. Joined 1/2005
- Reputation: 315
- Select All Posts By This User

I agree. I think the key here is that I'm not one of these people (though I don't know one, I'm sure they're out there) who thinks the first one is the end-all/be-all of comedy films. It was an enjoyable time at the theater. I laughed. Hard. Haven't watched or thought much of it since.
Having said that, I STILL don't get the level of vitriol being aimed at it by people like BurnInHell or certain other writers online. I'd hardly single this film/franchise out as "what's wrong with comedy films today," and that's the only reason I could see taking such steady aim at it like that.
And it really gets absurd when you veer into calling people "morons" for enjoying the first and, *gasp*, willingly wanting to watch this one. This isn't "that film."
Been reading the Badass Digest comments about the trailer, huh?
- Bucho
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Women sense my power
- offline
- 3,185 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: Somewhere between 2 to 22 hours into the future, aka New Zealand
- Reputation: 443
- Select All Posts By This User
Oooooooh noooooo you DI'N'T!!!
- joeypants
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Will you dance with me?
- offline
- 5,872 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Reputation: 16
- Select All Posts By This User
Indeed. I don't know, it's totally anecdotal but all I ever really heard was a pretty measured response one way or the other to The Hangover. I don't recall anyone saying it was the greatest thing ever, and I really don't recall anyone saying things like "this is a comedy for morons." Love it or hate it, again, I really disagree that this is "one of those" comedies.
I do wish the comedy genre had more to offer each year though. Such as it is, this is STILL going to probably be one of the year's high points, despite being such a formulaic retread.
- Gabe T
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Affording another Klendathu
- offline
- 3,385 Posts. Joined 1/2011
- Location: NYC
- Reputation: 1116
- Select All Posts By This User
HANGOVER II: IN SPACE would have been great.
- BurnInHell
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Your tears give me sustenance.
- offline
- 169 Posts. Joined 3/2011
- Reputation: 12
- Select All Posts By This User
If they were going to do a sequel, how about making it really fucked up, I mean, it’s set in Thailand!?! Have Bradley Cooper wake up and realize that he’s had a sex change operation. His cock and balls are missing and he has a pair of big fake tits in his chest with collagen bloated fish lips and tattooed eyebrows. Zach Galifianakis has no eyes and his tongue has been cut out while Ed Helms has his cock glued in the ass of that monkey while the only clue they have is a snuff film they shot where they raped and mutilated a 12 year old Thai whore.
- Jacob Singer
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Gettin' old ain't for pussies.
- offline
- 22,230 Posts. Joined 1/2000
- Location: Flowery Branch
- Reputation: 1047
- Select All Posts By This User
Let's drop this as a critique of comments, ok? Please?
- Gabe T
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Affording another Klendathu
- offline
- 3,385 Posts. Joined 1/2011
- Location: NYC
- Reputation: 1116
- Select All Posts By This User

If they were going to do a sequel, how about making it really fucked up, I mean, it’s set in Thailand!?! Have Bradley Cooper wake up and realize that he’s had a sex change operation. His cock and balls are missing and he has a pair of big fake tits in his chest with collagen bloated fish lips and tattooed eyebrows. Zach Galifianakis has no eyes and his tongue has been cut out while Ed Helms has his cock glued in the ass of that monkey while the only clue they have is a snuff film they shot where they raped and mutilated a 12 year old Thai whore.
So, Very Bad Things 2: Holy Shit, Even Worse Things.
I honestly kinda thought they would sorta-kinda (loosely) have the vibe you described, but this seems pretty safe and friendly. Perhaps the really upsetting stuff couldn't be sold in the trailer? You make a quarter of a billion in America on an R-rated comedy, maybe this time around you try to out-bleak Jody Hill in the comedy wars.
- JacknifeJohnny
- Trader Feedback: 0
- & The Fierce Pussy Posse
- offline
- 8,374 Posts. Joined 9/2003
- Location: W/ The All-Girl Amazon Attack Battalion
- Reputation: 1120
- Select All Posts By This User
I'm watching The Hangover on HBO right now, and watching that trailer just now makes it very, very clear to me that if this wasn't a bad idea monetarily, it was certainly a bad one creatively. The teaser excited me, but this full trailer counters that tenfold.
- The Rain Dog
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Mewling quims...
- online
- 14,371 Posts. Joined 4/2004
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Reputation: 3664
- Select All Posts By This User
Hollywood pumps out an unimaginative comedy sequel to capitalise on a surprise hit - news at eleven.
- Nicholas
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 921 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
I was honestly a little surprised at how quickly the small amount of interest I had from the teaser diminished after I watched the trailer.
And maybe I'm being an old man here but since when was it allowable to say "whores", "bitches" and have boner jokes in a green-band trailer?
- Grimoald
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 207 Posts. Joined 12/2005
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
The Hangover isn't very good, but there are a couple of excellent performances and some funny stuff. It obviously didn't deserve the cultural saturation it got, but at the same time it isn't awful and the backlash is needless.
Quote:

I am NEVER onboard a Todd Phillips film until I actually see it, and it ends up actually being funny. Seriously, every movie he does seems to have that slight stench of "you've seen this before" in the marketing and pre-release buzz, and then the movie ends up being way funnier than you could have guessed, usually because of the pacing and performances. So yeah, this was a dumb, unoriginal trailer to a movie that will probably be pretty funny, even though the temptation is to say Todd Phillips makes the same movie every time out.
I'm completely the opposite. His films generally have great casts and strong not-too high concept premises and I generally want to see them in the hope that they'll be good. The problem is they are bland and predictable and never, ever come close to being the sum of their parts.
He's no different to Jay Roach or Shaun Levy, just his films are more 'risque' and 'adult' - read boobs and swearing.
- stelios
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- online
- 12,460 Posts. Joined 1/2005
- Location: Greece
- Reputation: 2079
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't get the backlash against the first one or the pre-emptive hate against this. It's not that I'm expecting to be anywhere near as fun as the first one but I went into that too with the lowest of expectations. I'm open and welcoming to positive surprises. Worst case scenario, I'll pretend I'm gay and ogle Cooper. Throw a couple of wolf whistles too. Make people uncomfortable.
I laughed at the monkey fake-blowing the old guy on the bus though. It's true what Zach said. It's funny in every language.
- Nabster
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,968 Posts. Joined 11/2004
- Reputation: 22
- Select All Posts By This User
I think the backlash is due to the fact the first one is hailed as one of the greatest comedies of this generation, or a defining comedy of the generation. I'm pretty sure I read that here, in fact. Its also the most succesful r-rated comedy.
And in reality its a fairly terrible film. Theres no story really, other than a half baked idea. Its just a bunch of cliched toilet humor and random wackiness.
- Bucho
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Women sense my power
- offline
- 3,185 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: Somewhere between 2 to 22 hours into the future, aka New Zealand
- Reputation: 443
- Select All Posts By This User

I think the backlash is due to the fact the first one is hailed as one of the greatest comedies of this generation, or a defining comedy of the generation. I'm pretty sure I read that here, in fact. Its also the most succesful r-rated comedy.
And in reality its a fairly terrible film. Theres no story really, other than a half baked idea. Its just a bunch of cliched toilet humor and random wackiness.
It's the good old amnesiac quest trope grafted onto the good old men being boys trope but everyone loves Zach so, soooooo much (including me) and he had some nice comedic chemistry with Helms and Cooper. I think it's just that they made these dudes so damn likable and threw in a curve or two like Tyson and ... ok, just the one curve, but a lot of people loved taking the ride of that film. There's not much new in there but they pulled it off in a (relatively) fresh way (ie, not the Apatow way).
- BurnInHell
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Your tears give me sustenance.
- offline
- 169 Posts. Joined 3/2011
- Reputation: 12
- Select All Posts By This User
"The comedy classic of this generation". If that's how The Hangover is viewed then it's a fucking sad indication of how low our society has fallen. Growing up, some of my favorite comedies were Animal House, Vacation, Caddyshack, Meatballs etc...can anyone here say that The Hangover compares to those? I don't think so. Christ, it's not even the funniest comedy of it's type, that would be Bachelor Party and there was NOTHING in Hangover that topped that for outright hilarity.
Maybe I'm just getting old (32 fyi) but I re-watched Hangover just to be sure that I wasn't being a miserable old fucker but, no, the movie is nothing more then mildly amusing. Crank 2 was funnier then The Hangover and that was an action movie.
- JLassiter
- Trader Feedback: 0
- I wonder if there's beer on the sun
- offline
- 315 Posts. Joined 5/2010
- Location: North Carolina
- Reputation: 91
- Select All Posts By This User
I don't know if I'd call The Hangover "terrible". I actually quite enjoyed it when I went to see it in the theaters, but it's not a comedy that you can watch over and over again. So much on the film's humor relies on shock value and the audience being just as surprised as the characters as they start discovering what they did the night before. A nude Ken Jeong launching out of a car trunk while brandishing a tire iron is never going to be as funny if you know it's coming.
That being said, I can completely understand why the movie just never worked for some people, but I feel like some of the backlash against it has more to do with certain segments of the audience, mostly the dumb teenagers/frat boys, who overpraised and over-quoted the movie until you can't think about the movie without also thinking about that bro who thinks he's the first person to wear a "One Man Wolfpack" t-shirt out to the bars.
- 3nnui
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Where is my mind?
- offline
- 318 Posts. Joined 3/2011
- Reputation: 108
- Select All Posts By This User
It's fashionable to hate on Hangover, I am not saying it was great, it was mildly amusing with some good laughs. But when you mix in the fact that most comedy is dreadful, predictable and has this over-riding PC sensibility that you feel you are watching an afterschool special, the hangover seems hi-fooking-larious in comparison. Just the a couple of the bits, masterbaiting baby, 'I am not allowed near schools' and the blowjob in the elevator were such a breath of fresh air, that the movie earned good will from the public at large.
Is Galafinakus the second coming of Bill Murray? no of course not, but the beats the hell out of Steve Carrell and Russel Brand.
- Grimoald
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 207 Posts. Joined 12/2005
- Reputation: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
That's harsh on Carrell. Before he starting taking every big paycheck offered he was excellent in a lot of things and is obviously very talented (unfortunately I think getting his break when he was already in his mid-40s and married with kids made him favour commercial certainties over art).
I love Zach, but he's been a lot of crap himself.
- The Rain Dog
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Mewling quims...
- online
- 14,371 Posts. Joined 4/2004
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Reputation: 3664
- Select All Posts By This User
I will not hear a fucking word against Carrell. The mans talent is a deep well. Galifinakis is a one trick pony next to him.
- The K Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Rabid Anti-Dentite
- offline
- 291 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: Boston
- Reputation: 68
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah, Carrell's a really great comedic talent, and now that he's done some big pay check stuff and his Office schedule is clear, I can't wait to see some of the projects he takes on.
Galifinakis seems to be a funny guy who just really isn't afraid to go anywhere. Not necessarily in terms of content (he's no Louis CK) but he's cultivated a persona based on being able to stretch a concept to an uncomfortably funny point, and I have to respect him for that.
- THE HANGOVER: PART II GETS A REALLY SWEATY TRAILER
Recent Discussions
- › RIDLEY SCOTT WANTS TO FIT HARRISON FORD INTO BLADE RUNNER 2 22 seconds ago
- › In Sanford, Florida, murder is not a crime as long as the victim... 8 minutes ago
- › THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Pre-Release Thread 12 minutes ago
- › The Walking Dead Season 2 (AMC) 19 minutes ago
- › Crime Fiction Thread 2.0. 22 minutes ago
- › The B Action Movie Thread 24 minutes ago
- › Behold the spider-cricket 25 minutes ago
- › Greatest Animated Films Of All-Time 26 minutes ago
- › Game Of Thrones Season 2: Throne Harder SPOILER FREE 35 minutes ago
- › A Simple Plan (1998) 41 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Transformers: Dark of the Moon(2011) by trubrat
- › Slugs (Midnight Madness) by branbran77
- › ThanksKilling(2009) by branbran77
- › American Reunion by Mom2C
- › Motivation by tameka
- › Love Again by tameka
- › Your Highness(2011) by Leviathan Joe
- › Akira(1988) by andrewhawkins
- › Trainspotting(1996) by andrewhawkins
- › Night of the Creeps [Blu-ray] by andrewhawkins
New Articles
- › Live! Manchester City vs Bayern Munich -... by ahooo
- › Chu Ishikawa by andrewhawkins
- › Followers And Following by chudlurker
- › Daily Prize Wiki by Renn Brown
- › Guy Dot Com by Glory 2my Naval
- › Glitter by Anderson
- › How To Properly Report A Bug by BruceL
- › Preventing Flame Wars by Rourkefan
- › My Fan Made Movie Posters by Litmus Configuration
- › Bruce Wayne by Hammerhead
About CHUD.com Community | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 CHUD.com Community is powered by Huddler | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map



