CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE AVENGERS (2012) Pre-Release.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

THE AVENGERS (2012) Pre-Release. - Page 4

post #151 of 2004

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ska Oreo View Post

I might be the only one, but does anyone feel like there's a chance of this absolutely failing?  That isn't even a slight against Joss Whedon (the man is amazing), it's just I don't really see how something like "The Avengers" could actually work in a film medium.  Part of the appeal of a comic-book is that story arcs can play out through multiple issues, lasting months, even years.  Obviously, a film doesn't have that luxury.  I'm just afraid that this movie will turn out to be like The Expendables: a film hyped on the fact that its a massive team-up film, yet only the A-listers (in this case, RDJ and Chris Evans) get most of the screen time, while everyone else gets what amounts to a guest appearance.


I think it absolutely can fail, but I anticipate it will be on par with the other Marvel films. Good, but not great unless it is absolutely your thing*. I think that with the possible exception of the first Iron Man, that's a fair description of all the films in the franchise. Solid.

 

I don't think the bloat will be a problem. Whedon's done his fair share of ensemble work (read: just about everything he's ever done). I think threat will be the problem. When it comes trailer time, I want to see images of these people that have all been borderline invincible in their films looking terrified and/or beaten up.

 

 

*Full disclosure: these films are absolutely my thing. 

post #152 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

When it comes trailer time, I want to see images of these people that have all been borderline invincible in their films looking terrified and/or beaten up.

 

 

*Full disclosure: these films are absolutely my thing. 

 

Do you know, that literally just gave me goosebumps. That's never happened to me before.
 

 

post #153 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post





That's getting a little too close to the old pizza ice cream logic for me. After all, I like ice cream, I like pizza, so I should like ice cream on a pizza, right?


But this is more like chicken pizza. The characters I listed are all action-adventure characters; they fit together logically. Ice cream pizza would be like combining Lara Croft, Scott Pilgrim, Jane Austen's Emma, Tony Montana, Mater from Cars, and John Cusack's character from Being John Malkovich. AND I WOULD STILL SEE THAT MOVIE.

 

post #154 of 2004

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen 7!

post #155 of 2004

Agreed that Whedon is an amazing choice for The Avengers. He's basically been writing Marvel comics since he came to prominence, he can handle an ensemble like nobody's business, and he's one of the few genre storytellers out there who's actually trying to insert some challenging ideas and thematic depth into his stuff, beyond just delivering an explosion-fest (though he does that too). And unlike a lot of the recent Marvel movies, it sounds like Whedon's planning this one out pretty carefully, to the extent of inserting material into Cap and Thor, as opposed to Iron Man 2 which was apparently shooting without a script. Marvel studios seems to be run by geeks to a larger extent than other studios--which isn't always a good thing (you can see them treating their characters as the stars and the creatives as disposable, just like often happens in the comics) but I guess Whedon's geek clout has earned him more slack.

 

I *am* a Whedon fanboy. I acknowledge that there's stuff he can't do (like, say, write an ALIEN sequel) but this is solidly in his wheelhouse.

 

As for success? I often think these things depend more heavily on the competition than is sometimes acknowledged, and Avengers are the opening gun in a summer that otherwise looks kinda weak--the only other serious contenders are Men in Black 3 and The Dark Knight Rises. Everything else is either a B-list franchise or unproven (I'm putting Spider-man in that category, since it's a reboot, and it sounds like people may be thinking it's too soon). The context seems roughly on par with Iron Man 2. There's also the "positive sequel factor", where you can argue the first movie didn't set the box office on fire, but people liked it enough to make the second one a big hit (Thor, for instance, has made almost as much as Batman Begins did domestically, and MORE internationally) and I think people really liked Thor and Cap. Combine that with a year of hype and, yeah, I think it'll clear $700. People in general are a little burnt out on superhero movies, but I think this feels "special" in a way that the Spider-man reboot doesn't.

post #156 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen 7!


Don't laugh, we're still waiting to see who's in the next one. Except they'll be British, so never mind.

post #157 of 2004

Lots of Cleveland set pictures of NEW CAP floating around today.

This is probably the best one.

 

captain_america.jpg

post #158 of 2004

See, that just looks unnecessarily tricky to put on.

post #159 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

See, that just looks unnecessarily tricky to put on.



"Avengers! Assemble...my trousers!"

post #160 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Decade View Post



"Avengers! Assemble...my trousers!"



Tony Stark designed him an auto-assembly suitcase version.

post #161 of 2004
Thread Starter 
post #162 of 2004

I can't decide if Schmoes Know is an awesome name or a terrible one.

post #163 of 2004

avenger818113.jpg

 

I...I just don't think I can wait any longer.

post #164 of 2004

Ooooh...some shit is coming down. Cap's looking hurt and spooked and even Thor doesn't know what the fuck is happening. Me likey.

post #165 of 2004

Me likey so much I might cry

post #166 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Happenin View Post

Ooooh...some shit is coming down. Cap's looking hurt and spooked and even Thor doesn't know what the fuck is happening. Me likey.

 

 

It'll be interesting to see how/if they explain the ins and outs of what can injure Cap, because if a fucking kamikaze manuveur can leave him pretty much unscathed...

post #167 of 2004

I dunno, it looks like he might be saying something like, "Thor, stop SMASHING stuff!"

post #168 of 2004

Did CHUD have someone at D23 today?

post #169 of 2004

I hope there will be a write up soon. The footage sounded incredible. Give me 'splosions yes, but I'm far more interested in how these characters interact and banter together.

 

Fuck me, next summer can't come soon enough

post #170 of 2004

 

Found this on a blog!

 

During the Arena presentation of Building Worlds: Inside the Walt Disney Studios with Rich Ross there were many previews and

announcements of upcoming film projects, but none was bigger than The Avengers!

The footage they showed was spectacular….SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

The footage was about maybe 5 minutes long which showcase how the Avengers are getting together.   The best part of the preview was

the end which had Loki talking to Tony Stark.  They are drinking at a bar and Stark says” You my friend have managed to piss a lot of people off” 

Then it pans to Loki and he says to Stark, ” We have a massive army!”  And Stark replies,”We have the Hulk!”  Then it cuts and it shows

The Hulk screaming and roaring!!!! 

 

If you want to know what the Hulk will look like, look at the poster from Comic Con that they gave out.  It looks just like that on film.

After the trailer, Kevin Fiege introduced some of the cast that was present.  In came Tom Hiddlestone aka Loki, Jeremy Renner aka Hawkeye,

Scarlet Johansson aka Black Widow, Cobie Smulders aka Agent Hill, Chris Hemsworth aka Thor and of course Robert Downey Jr as Iron Man.

The arena was in a huge uproar when the cast started coming out on stage.  I have to say, it was pretty damn exciting!

 

 

We have a massive army!  .... we? NEVERMIND  the actual line goes:  I've got an army..

 

 

i'm so ready for this. *patiently waits for 2012*

 


Edited by Firestarter - 8/21/11 at 2:15pm
post #171 of 2004
Thread Starter 

@Firestarter, There are better descriptions on the event out there...


Edited by Andres - 8/21/11 at 7:48pm
post #172 of 2004

Yeah, I'm not lacking for descriptions, I'm just looking for the CHUD take.

post #173 of 2004

I hope they get the scale right on this. That's going to be hard to nail down. You want it to feel appropriately epic, probably bigger than all the previous Marvel films. But not leaden and ungainly, like the recent Pirates and Transformers films. Which for all their faults, none of the previous Marvel films have been.

 

I think Marvel has kind of struggled with scale thus far too. 

post #174 of 2004

I'm just hoping there's NOT gonna be a Hawkeye and Black Widow movie... I'll never make it to Avengers... Until them... I'm watching the animated series on Netflix Streaming...

post #175 of 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjen Rudd View Post

I hope they get the scale right on this. That's going to be hard to nail down. You want it to feel appropriately epic, probably bigger than all the previous Marvel films. But not leaden and ungainly, like the recent Pirates and Transformers films. Which for all their faults, none of the previous Marvel films have been.

 

I think Marvel has kind of struggled with scale thus far too. 


From the set videos Whedon and co certainly seem to blowing a hell of a lot of shit up. I hope that equates to scale.

 

Thor (which I loved), more so than the others, suffered from being too small. This can't afford to do the same.

 

post #176 of 2004

I'm just hoping they take some creative license with the Skrulls. I want freaky/plausible alien shapeshifters, not necessarily little green men with big ears and chin testes.

post #177 of 2004

I'm kind of surprised that no one has debunked the

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Thanos

rumors yet.

post #178 of 2004

There are

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Thanos

rumors? You will find no bigger Marvel cheerleader than me (save possibly Fleed... or Mike's Pants) but I can't imagine that working well.

post #179 of 2004

There's been no debunking because there have been no details coming out at all. 

 

With that, I haven't heard about any

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Thanos

 

rumors, until just now when you posted that.

 

I'm gonna start me a

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Blastaar

 

rumor and periodically remind people that it hasn't been debunked.

post #180 of 2004

The

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Thanos

rumor gained traction a couple of months ago, Google can give you many results. I found it curious that almost every site that reported on this were specifying that it was a SPOILER, even though the addition of another major character doesn't seem like spoiler territory. But maybe it's nothing.

 

Since I am a fiend for Avengers spoilers (and mojitos!), I will say that the Avengers IMDb casting page reveals a confirmation of what we suspected all along...

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

SKRULLS.

 

That's the sort of thing I've been reluctant to believe without full proof, but it seems more and more likely.

post #181 of 2004

A

 

Warning: Spoiler! (this is fun by the way) (Click to show)

Thanos

rumor seems like bona fide geek fan wankery as not a soul outside of Marvel geeks know who he is. It would not be shocking or surprising to 90% of the audience find out that the big bad was a

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

giant, raisin faced dude because they would have no ideas who he is.

 

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Skrulls

on the other hand, makes sense as a "surprise villain" as

 

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

shapeshifting aliens need no back story.

 

post #182 of 2004

MikeI, That would be...Awesome!

post #183 of 2004

The

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Skrulls are in Ultimates (and no, they're not green chin-testes dudes), which seems to be providing the basic model for the movie. I'm sort of mixed on that; I fucking loathe the Ultimates, but stirpped to its bare bones it IS a pretty good structure for an Avengers movie.

 

As for

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Thanos

, if he actually is in there and it's not a mistaken rumour, I assume he's something they're setting up for the next Avengers movie, not a major character. Maybe a post-credits cameo.

post #184 of 2004

I imagine I won't be commenting too much on The Avengers or the Marvel movie universe in general, but I have to say, I kinda hate Captain America's new costume. There are several shots, some posted in this very thread, that are more flattering to the very toyetic design and I'm sure proper lighting will do it a world of good, but still...

 

http://www.usmagazine.com/hotpics/photos/sexy-avengers-201159

 

Fuck, man, he looks like "Gilbert Schenk", pedophile repeat offender, doing reconnaissance as Captain America. Black Widow's wig is better, but her costume still looks like shit. 

post #185 of 2004

The biggest problem with NEW CAP is from the neck-up.

Hopefully they can shoot around it and use angles to make it cool. The WW2 costume looked pretty cool from all angles, though.

post #186 of 2004

I really don't like the thing at all. I suppose some geeks are happy that it's trying to get back to a brighter, more comic booky feel and all that, which is fine, but in pretty much all of the photos I've seen, it looks so goddamn cheap and 80's action figure-like. I will again throw in the caveat that a good DP (whoever has the honors on this production) can make it work, but as a snap judgment, it looks like some shit John Wesley Shipp would have rocked in an alternate universe.

post #187 of 2004

Finally, a straight on pic of Hawkeye.

avengers-production-03-480x754.jpg

 

avengers-production-10-480x715.jpg

Yikes, even the 1990 costume looked better than this.

 

 


Edited by Art Decade - 9/5/11 at 2:17pm
post #188 of 2004

Goddamn. Come on, man, some people have to be on my side for this one. And people actually complain about a pantyless Superman.

post #189 of 2004

JacknifeJohnny, Sorry, I think Cap and Hawkeye look...Awesome!  The problem with Superman is a bit different.  Without the underwear, he just might be too...SUPERSIZED, under his buckle, whenever Amy Adams' Lois Lane, walks into the room!

post #190 of 2004

Yeah, the new Cap suit is crap. The way the helmet attaches to the collar is really goofy, and the whole suit makes him look slight. Which is... not at all how you want Captain America to look.

 

And something about the new mask makes Evans look like Macaulay Culkin. It's weird.

post #191 of 2004

I'd even take Cap's USO costume over whatever's goin' on here:

avengers-production-lb.jpgscarlett-on-set-avengers-07-480x626.jpg

 

 

He looks like a car dealership mascot...

avengers-production-04-480x341.jpg

                                                          ...and he knows it.

post #192 of 2004

Hm not too impressive, but then again the Dark Knight Rises costumes look a bit lame/goofy too. I suspect when we see the final product the lighting and maybe cgi enhancements might make these outfits look more impressive. I hope.

post #193 of 2004

The new Cap suit looks very 80s action figure - I agree with Jacknife. Very puzzling, since the WWII version looked great, even in stills.

 

Hawkeye's duds work OK, though.

post #194 of 2004

Evans buffs up for the role and they manage to create a dorky suit that makes him look like pre-Super Soldier serum Rogers!

post #195 of 2004

Cylon Baby, I would say they are all supposed to be...Action Figures!  If there isn't enough...Action I...Figure, there will not be a...2nd Assembling of...The Avengers!

post #196 of 2004

Too clean, too tight, too much rubber on the helmet.

But it looks better than the MUSSHHHHED NOSE muscle suit in the 1990 movie, so let's not get ridiculous.

 

Again, the WW2 costume was much better, but I wouldn't get crazy about this until official stills and footage from the film come out.

post #197 of 2004

I hold out hope that his goofy costume is part of some plotline.

post #198 of 2004

Cap's neck looks all wrong - what works on the comic page rarely works in real life. The separate helmet approach works much better. Oh well.

post #199 of 2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Art Decade View Post
avengers-production-10-480x715.jpg

adult-buzz-lighyear-costume.jpg 5020-captain-america-costume.jpg

 

Looks very Halloween-costumey. But I also remember a ton of plasticky Thor costume complaints BEFORE the release.
 

 

post #200 of 2004

Ten bucks says Tony Stark is CONSTANTLY mocking Cap's outfit.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Focused Film Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE AVENGERS (2012) Pre-Release.