Recently, around the internet people have been slamming the new "wave" of zombie movies. I've read that zombies should not run, they are better when they stumble and shamble around.
I was wondering what everyone thought.
Some very good movies have 'running' zombies.
28 Days Later (I know, I know, they're really not zombies) used the fact that a fast brutal attack can happen anywhere.
Return of the Living Dead and it's sequels had animate, running crafty zombies.
these movies work, despite not fitting into the "slow zombie" mold.
on the other hand, Fulci's and Romero's zombies relied on their strength in numbers to get you, but they handled themselves on their own when they had to. So these are movies where slower zombies also worked.
I guess it boils down to opinion: What do you prefer your zombies to do?
I personally don't care, i love zombies.
And fast moving zombies can add some real scares if done right. (I hear that the Dawn of the Dead Remake will have very fast, ferocious zombies).
Thanks.
I was wondering what everyone thought.
Some very good movies have 'running' zombies.
28 Days Later (I know, I know, they're really not zombies) used the fact that a fast brutal attack can happen anywhere.
Return of the Living Dead and it's sequels had animate, running crafty zombies.
these movies work, despite not fitting into the "slow zombie" mold.
on the other hand, Fulci's and Romero's zombies relied on their strength in numbers to get you, but they handled themselves on their own when they had to. So these are movies where slower zombies also worked.
I guess it boils down to opinion: What do you prefer your zombies to do?
I personally don't care, i love zombies.
And fast moving zombies can add some real scares if done right. (I hear that the Dawn of the Dead Remake will have very fast, ferocious zombies).
Thanks.








