CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz Legally BONDed.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz Legally BONDed.

post #1 of 27
6/25/11 at 9:30pm
Thread Starter 

According to People, Daniel Craig, 43, married Oscar-winning actress Rachel Weisz, 41, last Wednesday in New York. The bold-faced couple, who reportedly began dating last fall, will play newlyweds onscreen in this fall’s Dream House. While the U.K. newspaper The Daily Mail first reported the nuptials, People got confirmation of the hush-hush event from Weisz’s rep. The couple married in front of four people, including Craig’s daughter Ella, 18, and Weisz’s son Henry, 4.

 

...while elsewhere Darren Aronofsky debated hanging himself with a shower cord...

Reply
post #2 of 27
6/25/11 at 9:55pm

Great PR for the movie. 

Reply
post #3 of 27
6/26/11 at 12:28am

Goddamnit why does Craig have to take her away from me?

Reply
post #4 of 27
6/26/11 at 6:49am

I thought there were rumblings that Craig was gay.

Reply
post #5 of 27
6/26/11 at 9:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarence Boddicker View Post

I thought there were rumblings that Craig was gay.



He's one of the few people I've never heard that about.

Reply
post #6 of 27
6/27/11 at 9:29am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarence Boddicker View Post

I thought there were rumblings that Craig was gay.

Rachel W can be my "beard" any day.
 

 

Reply
post #7 of 27
6/27/11 at 9:36am

I think you're thinking of Daniel Gayg.

Reply
post #8 of 27
6/27/11 at 9:38am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarence Boddicker View Post

I thought there were rumblings that Craig was gay.



Everybody's gay in Hollywood. 

Reply
post #9 of 27
10/21/11 at 4:40pm

What a wonderful couple. Rachel Weisz is one of my favorite actresses of all time (AGORA is my favorite film of 2010), and Daniel Craig is both Daniel Craig and James Bond. I wish them a very happy marriage!

Reply
post #10 of 27
10/21/11 at 5:18pm

Now this is a surprise. I didn't even know they were seeing each other.

Reply
post #11 of 27
10/21/11 at 5:32pm

I'm the only one who really deserves her.

 

Goddamnit when will she realize that?!!

Reply
post #12 of 27
10/21/11 at 5:56pm


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by felix View Post

Now this is a surprise. I didn't even know they were seeing each other

I've actually followed this story with great interest for a while now. Check the ARONOFSKY AND WEISZ SPLIT thread for more info. Weisz and Craig have been keeping things low key though*, so it's understandable you'd have missed this
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurenOrtega View Post

I'm the only one who really deserves her.

 

Goddamnit when will she realize that?!!

I do my best to take vicarious satisfaction from knowing that two of my favorite people are teaming up. Normally I don't at all care about celebrity couples, but Daniel Craig + Rachel Weisz? IMHO they are an ideal pairing

 

* Craig got all angry when it was brought up in an EW interview I read. They asked a question about how private he's been with the whole romance thing, and Craig is just like "and what did you infer from that? That it's private". The editor then inserted in italics "uncomfortable silence"


Edited by Princess Kate - 10/21/11 at 6:12pm
Reply
post #13 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:10pm

I too like the thought of sexy attractive people meeting up and having a sexy ever after and what not. But now I just feel sad and empty, and with an urge to curl up in the fetal position.

 

Granted most of my nights end that way, but still.

Reply
post #14 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:15pm

So is Darren Aronofsky drinking himself into a stupor right now, or resolutely sucking it up and saying "well, if you're gonna lose your girl to anyone, it might as well be James Bond"? Or both?

Reply
post #15 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:23pm


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurenOrtega View Post

I too like the thought of sexy attractive people meeting up and having a sexy ever after and what not. But now I just feel sad and empty, and with an urge to curl up in the fetal position.

 

Granted most of my nights end that way, but still.


 

Yeah there is that, but then again one time I was actually about 10 feet from Craig , and I got to see him on Broadway where by chance he took his shirt off for charity after the performance,  so to some extent I feel like I've already won

 

 

786458bb_260407353c6ec05a28f92ce0eb4857d9.jpg

Taken by a friend in NYC 11/25/09 when we went to see A STEADY RAIN (PS Hugh Jackman waved at me from across the street)

 

Reply
post #16 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:39pm

 

Quote:Whiteboy Jones

So is Darren Aronofsky drinking himself into a stupor right now, or resolutely sucking it up and saying "well, if you're gonna lose your girl to anyone, it might as well be James Bond"? Or both?

 

 

Drinking himself into a stupor hopefully. Hell I'd probably buy him a beer, tell him how great The Fountain was, then we can both have a good cry.

 

Then? Then it's watching the Princess Bride three times before passing out.

Reply
post #17 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:42pm

Didn't Aronofsky quit Wolverine because he didn't want to be away from his wife & kids or something? I wonder how that's working out for him.

Reply
post #18 of 27
10/21/11 at 6:53pm

Better Daniel Craig than Hugh Jackman?

Reply
post #19 of 27
10/22/11 at 11:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Decade View Post

Didn't Aronofsky quit Wolverine because he didn't want to be away from his wife & kids or something? I wonder how that's working out for him.


It was something to do with the custody hearing for the kids, iirc, since they'd already been split.

 

Reply
post #20 of 27
10/23/11 at 7:49am

I just think it's sort of awesome that 43 year old Craig isn't marrying a 20 year old. Huzzah for age appropriate people getting hitched!

Reply
post #21 of 27
10/23/11 at 1:12pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward_Woman View Post

I just think it's sort of awesome that 43 year old Craig isn't marrying a 20 year old. Huzzah for age appropriate people getting hitched!


The mistress will be a 20 year old.

Reply
post #22 of 27
10/23/11 at 1:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiteboy Jones View Post

So is Darren Aronofsky drinking himself into a stupor right now, or resolutely sucking it up and saying "well, if you're gonna lose your girl to anyone, it might as well be James Bond"? Or both?



I'm kind of hoping Aronofsky signs on to direct the next Bond picture and stages dangerously elaborate action sequences demanding that Craig do all his own stunts. Could be the best Bond film of all time!

Reply
post #23 of 27
10/23/11 at 1:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by User_32 View Post

I'm kind of hoping Aronofsky signs on to direct the next Bond picture and stages dangerously elaborate action sequences demanding that Craig do all his own stunts. Could be the best Bond film of all time!


Or the next Twilight Zone: The Movie.

 

Reply
post #24 of 27
10/23/11 at 2:14pm


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward_Woman View Post

I just think it's sort of awesome that 43 year old Craig isn't marrying a 20 year old. Huzzah for age appropriate people getting hitched!



I am not sure why that would matter. I am glad Weisz and Craig have teamed up, but if Craig had married someone in their 20s that would hardly have been age inappropriate

Reply
post #25 of 27
10/23/11 at 2:36pm

Because while it might be 'age appropriate,'  it's a damn common cliche to see some forty something guy dating and in love and 'soulmated' to some chick old enough to be his daughter. We're so used to it, we don't bat an eye at it - but its lame. 

Reply
post #26 of 27
10/23/11 at 2:37pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarleyQuinn22 View Post

The mistress will be a 20 year old.



Why u gotta rain on my parade?

Reply
post #27 of 27
10/23/11 at 3:19pm


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben W View Post




Or the next Twilight Zone: The Movie.

 



In all seriousness, I'd totally support an ARONOFSKY TTZ movie with Craig in the lead



Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward_Woman View Post

Because while it might be 'age appropriate,'  it's a damn common cliche to see some forty something guy dating and in love and 'soulmated' to some chick old enough to be his daughter. We're so used to it, we don't bat an eye at it - but its lame. 

 

I'll just have to respectfully disagree. It's not a cliche, it's just real life. It doesn't surprise me to see such couples because (not to generalize, but..) 99% of guys under 30-35 are, IMHO,  just completely uninteresting. They're not really men, they're overgrown frat boys. It seems unsurprising for someone my age to look at Daniel Craig - a cool, confident mature professional man - and think he'd make a good soulmate

 

Is it also true that older women get a pretty crummy shake in our society, and are virtually ignored by pop culture? Yes, absolutely and it is lame. But it's kind of a separate issue, IMHO

 

EDIT: my dad is 25 years older than my mom, and I've never thought there was anything 'cliche' or 'lame' about that. Again, it's just life

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz Legally BONDed.