CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › The Jungle Book (1994) is fucked up
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Jungle Book (1994) is fucked up

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 

I had some very specific memories of Disney's live action adaptation of The Jungle Book from the 90s so I recently re-watched it and, damn. For those not familiar with this movie, it's really got nothing to do with Kipling or the animated version at all - the first two thirds of it play as a kind of mildly charming Tarzan derivative consisting of the heroine trying to civilize Mowgli (with the help of Sam Neil and John Cleese) by teaching him the alphabet, taking him to dinner parties, etc. while rejecting the advances of a scenery-chewing Cary Elwes.

 

Out of nowhere the movie transforms into an Indiana Jones installment with a take no prisoners mentality that makes Crystal Skull come off as a Blues Clues episode (if it really needed help in the regard). What happens is the bad guys, who are mostly depicted as just a bunch of bumbling oafs in way over their heads, kidnap Mowgli and the heroine and force the former to lead them to a lost city of treasure deep in the jungle. Along the way the bad guys meet horrible deaths one-by-one: they drown in quicksand, fall off precipices onto rocks, get mauled by tigers, swallowed underwater by snakes, etc. These scenes are handled with a kind unsettling gratuitousness that's more befitting of the Saw franchise, even though I've never seen a Saw movie.

 

There's this one scene that takes the cake though. So one of the supporting villains, who'd suffered a bullet to the leg earlier in the flick, is chasing Mowgli through a temple and winds up in some sort of cramped mausoleum. There he inadvertently sets off a booby trap that makes the chamber fill with salt and depress a stone ceiling, sealing him inside. We - the seven year old audience - are treated to his desperate and vain attempts to escape, plus some salt getting into his wound, before his screams are silenced. You can't make this stuff up.

post #2 of 19

I have fond memories of Lena Headey being quite fetching in this.  Apart from that, this always felt like something of a trial run for the superior Mummy remake.

post #3 of 19

This bored the hell out of me as a kid. All I can really remember is someone getting killed by a wild animal or something, and Jason Scott Lee hooting like a monkey while it happened. And him stabbing or cutting someone with a knife, and declaring that he had very sharp teeth.

 

There is a good chance that neither of these things were in this movie.

post #4 of 19

 

Quote:ScottieFerguson
I have fond memories of Lena Headey being quite fetching in this.

 

Oh yeah Headey done up all Victorian and proper is kind of delightful for me.

 

It's funny though because I haven't watched this movie in a few years, but I remember seeing it at a young age on a double bill with the Santa Claus, at Christmas. And for some reason it's imprinted in my head a lot better than a lot of more high-quality films. I can still remember every death(Which I'm pretty sure I panicked over) and Elwes getting himself fucked-up old school by the snake is something that I can still recall perfectly.

post #5 of 19

Yes, I remember thinking this at the time. The death scenes in this movie are fucking horrific.

 

The dude getting buried alive is terrifying, and it goes on forever, like at least three minutes of screen time is him wordlessly trying to escape his tomb in slow motion. What's more, he's not a featured villain or anything, he's just a dude they hired. He's got no lines, and seems to be a glorified porter.

post #6 of 19

I was old and broken by the time this came out. Other than boring me it had no other effect.

post #7 of 19

Loved this when I was a kid. I remember thinking it odd that the animals were not talking, but now I consider it a strong creative decision. Otherwise, this could've been a Scooby Doo...

 

The deaths were satisfying and classic, as childrens' stories didn't used to shy away from harsh realities. Mowgli warned them not to abuse nature.

post #8 of 19

Dug this back in the day. Will probably whip this one out for the daughter (she's 7) and see she how she responds to the various onscreen life-ending mishaps. ;)

post #9 of 19

I saw this with my best friend when I was in the eighth grade.  I haven't seen it since and all I remember about it is the death by salt.  That and the stomach bug I caught from my friend's sister when we went to her house after the movie.  New Year's Day 1995 was not a good day for me.  

post #10 of 19

Is this the one where Mowgli (as a toddler) accidentally sits down on a big piece of bark, or something, and slides down a long hill and then floats across a lake? I remember thinking, even when I was a kid, "bullshit." Talking animals was more believable to me. 

post #11 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartleby_Scriven View Post

The deaths were satisfying and classic, as childrens' stories didn't used to shy away from harsh realities. Mowgli warned them not to abuse nature.


I think what sets this apart from something like Return to Oz is that even if they had been handled in a totally chicken shit way, the Indiana Jones elements were sort of a glaringly out-of-place conceit to integrate into a Kipling adaptation (even an extremely loose one) in the first place, so what's the motivation to turn the knob up to eleven?   I mean there's some full-on EC Comics ironic/macabre comeuppance shit going on here.  It's kind of remarkable.  There's a cruel tone to it that the actual Indiana Jones movies never had even at their most guy-getting-pulled-through-a-rock-crusher violent. And while Youtube seems to be allergic to Crystal Skull footage, I submit that comparing the quicksand scenes from these two movies is kind of hysterical.

 

There's probably something to the notion that this was sort of Sommers' proof of concept for The Mummy.

 

post #12 of 19

Thanks for reminding me that this existed.  I remembered literally nothing at all from it, but your description brought it all bubbling back to the surface.  I seems to have had it confused with another live-action "Jungle Book" that came out around the same time, was a heck of a lot more kid-oriented, and had Ertha Kitt voicing Bagheera among other odd choices.

 

Incidentally, while I hear the Russian adaptation is very good, Chuck Jones' "Mowgli's Brothers"/"Rikki-Tikki-Tavi"/"The White Seal" is, taken as a trilogy,  the best Jungle Book adaptation.

post #13 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by TragicTheDragon View Post

Thanks for reminding me that this existed.  I remembered literally nothing at all from it, but your description brought it all bubbling back to the surface.  I seems to have had it confused with another live-action "Jungle Book" that came out around the same time, was a heck of a lot more kid-oriented, and had Ertha Kitt voicing Bagheera among other odd choices.

 

Incidentally, while I hear the Russian adaptation is very good, Chuck Jones' "Mowgli's Brothers"/"Rikki-Tikki-Tavi"/"The White Seal" is, taken as a trilogy,  the best Jungle Book adaptation.


I'm curious to hear what you think of the animated Disney Jungle Book, Tragic. I absolutely love it, but as a Kipling adaptation.... well, Walt *did* tell the creative team not to read it. Otherwise, it's still an incredibly entertaining flick.

 

post #14 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Spider View Post




I'm curious to hear what you think of the animated Disney Jungle Book, Tragic. I absolutely love it, but as a Kipling adaptation.... well, Walt *did* tell the creative team not to read it. Otherwise, it's still an incredibly entertaining flick.

 


Yeah, I like it as a fun little Disney musical from the 60's.  That said, I liked it a damn sight better before I read Kipling.

 

post #15 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by TragicTheDragon View Post




Yeah, I like it as a fun little Disney musical from the 60's.  That said, I liked it a damn sight better before I read Kipling.

 


Heh. I'm honestly not a huge Kipling fan myself (while he may not have necessarily been a racist, the whole White Man's Burden thing can be kind of, uh, awkward), though he is a good writer, so it doesn't really matter to me one way or the other.

 

Incidentally, do you mind if I PM you about animation discussions in the future? I'm thrilled to find another informed, passionate fan on here (your blog is quite well-done, if I may say so).

 

post #16 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Spider View Post

Heh. I'm honestly not a huge Kipling fan myself (while he may not have necessarily been a racist, the whole White Man's Burden thing can be kind of, uh, awkward), though he is a good writer, so it doesn't really matter to me one way or the other.

 

Incidentally, do you mind if I PM you about animation discussions in the future? I'm thrilled to find another informed, passionate fan on here (your blog is quite well-done, if I may say so).

 



Point the first: It's a little unnerving that I was so caught up in "Holy sh*t, animal characters who actually act like animals!" and completely missed the other subtexts...

 

Point the second: Aww, thanks!  I was actually thinking of starting a catch-all animation discussion thread if it's okay.  Not sure about the PMs cause the more the merrier.

post #17 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by TragicTheDragon View Post





Point the first: It's a little unnerving that I was so caught up in "Holy sh*t, animal characters who actually act like animals!" and completely missed the other subtexts...

 

Point the second: Aww, thanks!  I was actually thinking of starting a catch-all animation discussion thread if it's okay.  Not sure about the PMs cause the more the merrier.

 

Good point, I suppose. But yeah, go ahead and start an animation thread, I'd be happy to join.

post #18 of 19

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TragicTheDragon View Post
Point the second: Aww, thanks!  I was actually thinking of starting a catch-all animation discussion thread if it's okay.

Or you could always just post in the "All Things Animated" thread.

post #19 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARKMITE8 View Post

 


Or you could always just post in the "All Things Animated" thread.



Ah yes, of course.  (Wah, give me a break I'm new wah.)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movie Miscellany
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › The Jungle Book (1994) is fucked up