CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE MAN OF STEEL Pre Release Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

THE MAN OF STEEL Pre Release Thread - Page 8

post #351 of 2590
Originally Posted by LowCalorieCola View Post

The reason they put contrails in the teaser is because they did that in the Iron Man teaser. Understand that there is no art to this movie and that extends to the marketing. They're simply making another one to jump on the reboot/origin story bangwagon. They've hired an unimaginative choice for Director and he's going to give the movie all the mock Americana sentimentalistic drivel expected like the Michael Bay clone that he is.

 

You know, I really HATE Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow but I think they should have given Superman to Kerry Conran because Sky Captain has the type of aesthetic that I want to see from a Superman movie. But with a richer color palette. A Kerry Conran Directed, Max Fleischer styled Superman with Jon Hamm in the role would be fucking perfect! 

 

 

CREEEEEEEPPPYYYYY

post #352 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCE View Post

 

CREEEEEEEPPPYYYYY

 

700

post #353 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCE View Post

 

CREEEEEEEPPPYYYYY

 

700

post #354 of 2590

I... really doubt the contrails are there because of Iron Man. I thought they were a cool touch myself.

post #355 of 2590

The contrails are there because things that go fast through the air make contrails. Movies, people.

post #356 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL View Post

 

Contrails are just water vapor.  High pressure + low pressure = condensation... errr or something like that.


But it requires certain aerodynamic shapes to actually make them form like that. 'Feet' are not one of those shapes. You likely also wouldn't get the convex pressure form when breaking the sound barrier with a man shaped object because, again, that happens due to aerodynamic laws that Superman's flight ignores.

post #357 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiteboy Jones View Post

The contrails are there because things that go fast through the air make contrails. Movies, people.

I just think the two neat little contrails coming out of his feet look odd and unrealistic. I wouldn't mind some sort of lighter more generalized contrail following in his wake, but this makes him look like he has jet engines in his boots.
post #358 of 2590

The name "Malick" is being tossed around to a laughable degree in this thread. If the teaser was Malick, it would be roughly one shot, two max. Just because Snyder has finally learned not to ramp up/ramp down (at least as far as the teaser is concerned) doesn't mean he's even shooting for anything close to Malick, or would know how to ape his style even if he did try. 

 

Wasn't Superman Returns serious enough for you guys? You want Superman to be more serious? Good luck. If this movie is remotely good I'll eat my hat. 

post #359 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker View Post

The name "Malick" is being tossed around to a laughable degree in this thread. If the teaser was Malick, it would be roughly one shot, two max. Just because Snyder has finally learned not to ramp up/ramp down (at least as far as the teaser is concerned) doesn't mean he's even shooting for anything close to Malick, or would know how to ape his style even if he did try. 

 

Wasn't Superman Returns serious enough for you guys? You want Superman to be more serious? Good luck. If this movie is remotely good I'll eat my hat. 


No one is saying the artsy, Malick-esque cinematography is a good thing (or even a bad thing).  It's just an observation.  Even Faraci noted it.  There is no doubt that Tree of Life influenced some of those shots, for better or worse. 

post #360 of 2590

Not seeing it. And Devin isn't infallible. He's not even a fan of Malick outside of Tree of Life. 

post #361 of 2590

Oh seriously?  The non traditional composition, the lingering loving shots of nature set to raspy introspective voice over?  Surely you can at least understand why the comparisons are made even if you don't agree.

post #362 of 2590

Didn't say he was dude. (ahem) Just an observation. 

post #363 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fafhrd View Post


But it requires certain aerodynamic shapes to actually make them form like that. 'Feet' are not one of those shapes. You likely also wouldn't get the convex pressure form when breaking the sound barrier with a man shaped object because, again, that happens due to aerodynamic laws that Superman's flight ignores.

 

 

....and with that I hate the internet.

 

Again.

post #364 of 2590

Apologies if anyone has already posted this but there's a much better look at the Comic Con trailer here, for those who are interested.

post #365 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post

 

 

....and with that I hate the internet.

 

Again.

 

Just admit it would have been better if they'd used the red Mighty Mouse contrail.  Admit it!

post #366 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey View Post

 

Just admit it would have been better if they'd used the red Mighty Mouse contrail.  Admit it!

 

Seriously. Apparently we can jump through the massive mental hoops it takes to believe a humanoid alien can crash land on this planet and be gifted the powers of a god thanks to the fact we have a yellow sun (?) - but feet can't make contrails.

 

700

post #367 of 2590

Lets get the Mythbusters on this shit and make this horrible dumb tangent FUN!

 

Also, free ice cream!

post #368 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeman View Post

Oh seriously?  The non traditional composition, the lingering loving shots of nature set to raspy introspective voice over?  Surely you can at least understand why the comparisons are made even if you don't agree.

 

Are you talking about Malick or the Lord of the Rings trilogy?

post #369 of 2590

It's not ALL malick, but it is much more Malick than LOTR. The intensely narrow depth-of-field, loving quiet shots of nature and everyday life, unconventional composition and focal points, shit blowing in the wind... But Malick doesn't have ownership of the style. I also see some Andrew Dominik and Michael Mann there.

post #370 of 2590

post #371 of 2590

If they had that many shots completed and ready to be shown for an audience of hundreds at comic con, it's a real head scratcher how they could have such a weak introduction trailer for the tens of millions seeing TDKR.

post #372 of 2590

Yeah, that's a better trailer than what we actually got.

post #373 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evi View Post

It's not ALL malick, but it is much more Malick than LOTR. The intensely narrow depth-of-field, loving quiet shots of nature and everyday life, unconventional composition and focal points, shit blowing in the wind... But Malick doesn't have ownership of the style. I also see some Andrew Dominik and Michael Mann there.

Would you agree, though,  that Malick's style is identifiable? If you watch a Malick movie, you know its his without seeing credits. Does anyone else on earth make movies like he does? You can make comparisons, but one of the reasons why he's one of the greatest living filmmakers is that his style is so unique and uniquely his own. 

Also, comparing Malick and Mann? Jesus..never thought I'd see that. Andrew Dominik, maybe, but there's something very specific about how Malick's movies look, sound and feel. That's why the comparison is so insane. No, he doesn't "own" the style, but his style is HIS style and for someone to ape it accurately, they need more than just quiet shots of nature and everyday life (which, I should point out, the Man of Steel teaser barely even has). 

post #374 of 2590

I mostly got Abrams from that teaser, to be honest. The grainy home video-style shots and bombastic voice over put me in mind of his 80s Amblin-aping SUPER 8 approach.
 

post #375 of 2590

I like how Snyder is aping Malick because he's finally filming some scenes that take place outside.

 

Looked pretty intriguing, but I'm skeptical of Snyder making anything that I'd want to see twice.

post #376 of 2590

It's mostly the farm stuff that reminds me of Malick, but it is peppered throughout the ad. Also I don't think anyone is saying that Snyder has completely and successfully assimilated Malick's style, just that the teaser brought Malick to mind exactly because his style is so identifiable and it's so anti everything we've seen coming from Snyder thus far.

post #377 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post

I mostly got Abrams from that teaser, to be honest. The grainy home video-style shots and bombastic voice over put me in mind of his 80s Amblin-aping SUPER 8 approach.
 

 

That didn't occur to me (no lens flares!), but I can very much see it. I think the teaser is far more Baysian and/or Abramsesque than Malickian.

post #378 of 2590
Thread Starter 

Regarding Malick- Parker, I don't think that anyone's saying that anything in this trailer is anything near as good as Malick, just that they can spot an influence. And that influence is there, but noting and appreciating it isn't the same as a comparative value judgment. And there is a Malickian vibe in this trailer, but it's not just like Malick, it's influenced by what he's contributed to the cinematic lexicon to evoke a certain dramatic energy and feel. Saying, "Oh, cool, that's kind of like Malick," is coming up because it's the most obvious touchstone. If anyone is putting Snyder on the same level as Malick, just in terms of basic aesthetics, that person is insane.

 

Some thoughts from someone who's way too into Superman:

 

1) I don't mind the seriousness. Serious doesn't necessarily equal dour, which is what Returns was in its worst moments. This doesn't feel dour so far. Besides, there have always been notes of melancholy to the character. It's one of the reasons why he resonates. One of the things that the Superman story is about is living with grief in a world that doesn't quite understand it anymore, but being able to live a good and happy life despite that.

 

2) I like the idea of duelin' teasers more than the actual execution, but I like what it seems to hint at with regards to their tack with the origin. In the Donner film, the "Superman identity" is something basically foisted upon Kal-El/Clark Kent by Jor-El, so he never really "owns it" in that film, which never sat quite right with me. They seem to be setting up a conflict between the desires of Jor-El and Pa Kent, with the resulting invention of Superman being Clark/Kal's distillation of both of their lessons. Which is something that I like about the current (sometimes spotty) Action Comics run: Superman is his own invention and his own man, which I think rings truer to the character. Here's hoping this movie follows a similar route.

 

I don't know that I'm completely sold, but I'm at least cautiously optimistic at this point. We'll see what happens.

post #379 of 2590
Nolan and Snyder had my curiosity. Now they have my attention.
post #380 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.S. Randlett View Post

Regarding Malick- Parker, I don't think that anyone's saying that anything in this trailer is anything near as good as Malick, just that they can spot an influence. And that influence is there, but noting and appreciating it isn't the same as a comparative value judgment. And there is a Malickian vibe in this trailer, but it's not just like Malick, it's influenced by what he's contributed to the cinematic lexicon to evoke a certain dramatic energy and feel. Saying, "Oh, cool, that's kind of like Malick," is coming up because it's the most obvious touchstone. If anyone is putting Snyder on the same level as Malick, just in terms of basic aesthetics, that person is insane.

 

You got a thumbs up from me for this, but I felt like it deserved a full comment as well. I have to agree. The "this looks Malickish" argument isn't being made-- at least not by me, or by the people in this thread (because I assume people on CHUD just know better)-- to equate Snyder with Malick in terms of artistry. It's being made to illustrate some Malick influence in the meager amount of footage displayed in this trailer, and I think it's hard to ignore that influence. Honestly, I find the tone to be incredibly refreshing; it's not something that I expect from the man who burned us all out on speed ramping. So, really, that Malickish influence is a very good thing, at least for me, and certainly not a knock against Snyder at all.

post #381 of 2590

I know nobody is saying Snyder = Malick. My point remains that just a few shots of nature, laundry flapping in the breeze and a somber looking bearded guy working the docks isn't enough to be evocative of Malick. The footage looks grainy and color corrected, slightly. It looks more natural than Snyder's usual stuff, but Malick's movies look lucid, his camerawork ghostly and otherworldly, floating over his characters like an unseen observer, his editing hard to pin down (often he lets shots linger, or favors jump cuts). 

post #382 of 2590

See, I do get that ethereal, untethered quality from the released footage. I'm willing to admit that it's rather minor, but it feels like Malick filtered through a much more organic version of Snyder's cinema. So it's influenced footage, but that's not to say it's identical to what Malick does in, say, Days of Heaven or Tree of Life. (Though it's honestly the latter film that connects Malick's aesthetic to the Superman footage. It's probably the imagery more than anything else.)

post #383 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmNerdJamie View Post

400

 

Wait, does something fly off of him midway through that?  Like he just lost a shoe?

post #384 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBananaGrabber View Post

 

Wait, does something fly off of him midway through that?  Like he just lost a shoe?

 

The red trunks.

 

post #385 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBananaGrabber View Post

 

Wait, does something fly off of him midway through that?  Like he just lost a shoe?

 

882b6b38_30m6eli.gif
2e8212ed_Turbine_Explosion.gif

Clears that up.

post #386 of 2590

Superman was also pissed about that finale...

post #387 of 2590

700

post #388 of 2590

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by HypnoToad View Post

 

882b6b38_30m6eli.gif
2e8212ed_Turbine_Explosion.gif

Clears that up.

 

Wow, thanks for the nostalgia-bomb.

post #389 of 2590

I love this teaser, even if it features a lot more fishing imagery than I expected from a Superman movie. 

post #390 of 2590

If I knew last night that I was going to be reminded of Sky Captain's existence I would've taken a week's worth of valium and slept.

post #391 of 2590
I KNEW that Jor-El voiceover sounded familiar. Like the sources they're pulling dialogue from, if this is any indication of the film itself then count me in.

Hmm image posting not cooperating, but here's a link:

[=http://urbaneturtle.tumblr.com/post/27845048808/bossbattle-you-have-shown-them-the-face-of-the][/]

It's from the final pages of All-Star Superman, so mild spoilers I guess.

James
post #392 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Virtanen View Post

I love this teaser, even if it features a lot more fishing imagery than I expected from a Superman movie. 


No kidding. When I saw the trailer my first thought was 'Holy shit, they're making an Aquaman movie?'

post #393 of 2590

Did the comic-con footage ever turn up again?

post #394 of 2590

I haven't seen it anywhere else yet.  I was really hoping after a couple weeks, they'd release it for everyone to see.

post #395 of 2590

I watched the Superman Motion Picture last night for the first time in a few years and I did a complete 180 on Superman.  Maybe it's because I appreciate it as the first big origin story on film I can think of, or maybe seeing Captain America done right and liking the gee whiz of that has me feeling nostalgic, but I suddenly love Superman again after thinking he's lame and over powered for years.

post #396 of 2590

I'm excited by the prospects of a DC Nation coming together with a different vibe than the Marvel Nation. I thought The Dark Knight Rises had enough of a comic book vibe that a film like it could be part of a bigger pantheon.
 

post #397 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeman View Post

I watched the Superman Motion Picture last night for the first time in a few years and I did a complete 180 on Superman.  Maybe it's because I appreciate it as the first big origin story on film I can think of, or maybe seeing Captain America done right and liking the gee whiz of that has me feeling nostalgic, but I suddenly love Superman again after thinking he's lame and over powered for years.

 

Netflixed it a few months ago, I was surprised how much I enjoyed it.  That score!  That 80's everything!

post #398 of 2590
Thread Starter 

One thing about Superman The Movie that people give a lot of shit to is Hackman's Luthor, but I think he makes it work. Especially the change from goofy to threatening when he launches the nukes, and it's sold almost entirely by Hackman's performance. I think that that performance really informed Tom Hiddleston's wonderful turn as Loki in Avengers, who walks a similar line between ridiculous and genuine menace.

 

Considering a lot of what went on behind the scenes on that one, it's a miracle that it's as good as it is.

post #399 of 2590

To be clear, I think it's good, but these people who think that movie is the best superhero movie ever made are out of their fucking minds.
 

post #400 of 2590
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.S. Randlett View Post

One thing about Superman The Movie that people give a lot of shit to is Hackman's Luthor, but I think he makes it work. Especially the change from goofy to threatening when he launches the nukes, and it's sold almost entirely by Hackman's performance. I think that that performance really informed Tom Hiddleston's wonderful turn as Loki in Avengers, who walks a similar line between ridiculous and genuine menace.

 

Considering a lot of what went on behind the scenes on that one, it's a miracle that it's as good as it is.

 

Is there a good site/book/documentary on the behind the scenes stuff?  I've only heard bits and pieces.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Focused Film Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE MAN OF STEEL Pre Release Thread