CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › REVIEW: THE HELP
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

REVIEW: THE HELP

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
by Joshua Miller: link

The Help could've used some more help.
post #2 of 8

I had one of the weirdest issues with this movie - I honestly thought Jessica Chastain's character was actually Bryce Dallas Howard's character, and we were seeing her in flashbacks or something. They looked EXACTLY alike, and with twenty minutes left in this impossibly long movie, I finally realized that they were not the same person. Such an embarassing, stupid mistake. When it turns out they dislike each other, I kept waiting for a revelation of them being sisters or something. Seriously, how can you cast, and dress, two women almost exactly alike like that? Or am I just dense? I dunno, all white people look alike.

 

I thought Spencer and Davis were FANTASTIC. Part of my problem with this movie stems from 25% of the film's run-time dealing with the plot device of an actual pie made of human excrement. It's a pie made of shit. I get it. This is supposed to be the "adult" alternative to all the superhero movies and such currently playing?

post #3 of 8

At the moment, Chastain looks like a sleeker model of Howard.  I can see why you got the two mixed up.

post #4 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post

At the moment, Chastain looks like a sleeker model of Howard.  I can see why you got the two mixed up.


No kidding. I just watched Fiennes' new Shakespearan adaptation trailer and was confused that Howard's name didn't pop up at end.

 

post #5 of 8

I should do a CHUD column called "Date Night", because I end up seeing films with the girlfriend I feel like most chewers would never bother with to see.

 

So this was a film with problems but overall its strong moments outweigh the whole. 

 

The cast is, as in the review, uniform in quality but Viola Davis is the standout. Most of her "big" scenes feel like Oscar bait, they're a bit too easy with the tearjerking, but she pulls off a broken woman that finds new strength admirably. Emma Stone is a relatable and compelling lead, but is too much the anachronism. There is little to convince me that, with her background, she turned out so different than her fellow Jacksonian women. Like, why is she friends with Hilly if Skeeter was always a tomboy and never had a boyfriend? They must have been friends pre-High School, but the movie never develops that. Bryce Dallas-Howard, meanwhile, is suitably chilly and deliciously evil, but aside from a few scenes when she shows affection to her children she's never humanized. She is one-dimensional hateful, towards black and white women, but why? Because she lost Johnny to Celia? We barely get to meet Johnny, and we never see him with Hilly, so it's hard to relate...

 

My girlfriend had read the book, so I was lucky to have her to fill in a lot of the details. For the most part the movie works as a cinematic adaptation, but there were aspects that felt missing. For instance, we're given a relatively consistent timeline at first (Skeeter arrives back in Jackson; Medgar Evers dies so its June, 1963; the March on Washington is mentioned coming up so it must be August, 1963; then JFK is assassinated halfway through the film so it must be November, 1963; but then Aibileen's boss gets pregnant and suddenly the baby is born and looks to be a few months old), but around the time the other maids are brought in and the book gets published a lot of time apparently passes without many signposts. With that in mind, certain character's only characterization comes from the fact that they've been in Skeeter's life for almost a year, although we don't feel feel the weight of that time. Stuart the boyfriend starts off as fascinating enough as he's a jerk and then redeems himself, but after that he's window dressing and his sudden anger at Skeeter's book feels unmotivated. Nelsan Ellis, Lafayette from True Blood, also shows up as a Godfearing waiter, but only for three scenes and has little impact on the plot. 

 

Octavia Spencer as Minny is the standout. She's hilarious at times, insightful and her hetero-lifemate relationship with Aibileen is sweet. Unfortunate one of the blaring moments in the film, the fact that her unseen husband Leroy beats her, is never given any closure. She's a strong women with her friends and isn't afraid to stand up to white women and social norms, but she lets her husband beat her? Her arc feels incomplete, and I'm sure the book covers it. Speaking of Leroy, him being an unseen threat is probably why Stuart and Henry the Waiter (Ellis) are even in the film. There are barely any male characters, which is fine because this is a movie dealing with how woman interact with each other, but that made Stuart and Henry feel forced into the plot. 

 

Nice period details, like everyone in the movie smoked (although almost immediately the newspaper editor says something like "some day they'll prove those things will kill you." See the "Authentic Decadence" thread). Very relatable because my parents grew up in Alabama. Recommended to watch with a girlfriend or mom, but this isn't a treatise that will end racism or anything.

post #6 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe T View Post

I thought Spencer and Davis were FANTASTIC. Part of my problem with this movie stems from 25% of the film's run-time dealing with the plot device of an actual pie made of human excrement. It's a pie made of shit. I get it. This is supposed to be the "adult" alternative to all the superhero movies and such currently playing?

 

And they use the shit pie as the same punchline to the same joke FIVE TIMES. Is this not the poopiest movie since Water Power?

 

I haven't actively loathed a movie this much since Crash.
 

 

post #7 of 8

Best shit eating since American Wedding.

 

This is full of caricatures but Howard plays a fabulous racist bitch. Seriously, she's nearly as punchable as the overly religious lady in The Mist. You are just waiting for someone to slap some sense into her. Chastain surprised me. Early on such a superficial character, but they do build her. Sadly Skeeter doesn't do much, but Stone does a fine job with the few scenes she's got. Spencer is great, so is the actress of Aibilene.

As a movie, it's fine, but it could have been so much better. As you said, it should have risked more. Make Howard actually a threat. When they sat at the table and thought about what might happen if it ever comes out, they should have worked with that.

 

A scary thought that these ridiculous times weren't that long ago. Separate toilets for two kinds of people. And I bet some die hard Palin fans wish those times back, wish to have such a 'help'.

 

 

 

post #8 of 8

Viola Davis was so moving in this movie--the way she walked, the cast of her face, like she was always bracing herself for the next blow.  Chick flicks generally make my skin crawl, but I thought The Help was marvelous.  And the shit pie was funny, the "terrible awful."  Sissy Spacek was great too, the whole cast was. 

 

Chris, it is pretty staggering that this wasn't so long ago.  A lot of those people are still alive, and it will take another generation or so to stamp out those disgusting, racist precepts. 

 

Bartleby, domestic abuse in those days--especially if you were a black woman working as a domestic--was just something you had to live with.  It would be a different movie if it dealt with that issue, it would have to be a movie in itself because of how near impossible it was to get away from, think Dolores Claiborne.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Focused Film Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › REVIEW: THE HELP