CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Jane Eyre (2011)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Jane Eyre (2011)

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 

Having read this book earlier this year, I decided to check out the latest adaptation. 

 

It's a thoroughly atmospheric piece that hits the high notes of the book while losing a bit of the meat. The camera work is beautiful, managing to evoke dread, isolation and beauty all at the same time. Really, truly wonderful images of nature on display here! The houses, as well, are shrouded in shadows and enhanced the already present air of the supernatural that the book only hints at.

 

For the most part, and somewhat surprisingly, this is played as a horror movie. There are several haunted house tropes, including (unfortunately) a few jump scares, but it manages to pull back from cliche. I worried that this was all an attempt to Hollywood-ize the book, but it never delves into spectacle. 

 

The actors are roundaboutly solid. Mia Wasikowska has a quiet urgency to her here that is far superior to anything in Alice in Wonderland. She has Jane's intelligence, but was maybe a bit too fragile at times. The constant crying in the second half is not how I pictured Jane, but rather she should have been cold and distant. Michael Fassbender is commanding and engaging, but not nearly as ugly as the Rochester I envisioned from the book. The truth is that he's an asshole, a truly horrible person, and there is a tendency in the film to soften his cruel actions. 

 

The two actors have a degree of chemistry together, but it's slightly rushed and comes across as more of a crush on his part and relief on her's. Finally she'll be free of her "tale of woe"! Still, that could be an interpretation of the book. I was a bit disappointed at how abruptly the movie ends. The irony is that Jane is finally bequeathed a position of power when she decides to stay with the blinded Rochester. It's perhaps a bit of reverse Florence Nightengale syndrome, but the tables are turned and there's a man completely reliant on her. The movie plays it up like two star-crossed lovers united. 

 

Hmmm.

 

Definitely worth a look if you're into period pieces. The costumes alone are worth the $1 Redbox. 

post #2 of 2
I found the acting engaging and consider my decision to watch JANE EYRE worthwhile on that level. I thought Fassbender and Wasakowska did good work with characters that I would have found too grim to engage with under normal circumstances. The film was well photographed, but the general atmosphere was so unrelentingly grey and humorless that in end I walked away feeling as though I'd endured the film rather than enjoyed it. The movie seemed to keep it's characters at a distance, and so I found it difficult to relate emotionally with Jane's "tale of woe"

I am glad I saw this film, but I ultimately I didn't find it to be a particularly memorable entry in the genre

PS Jamie Bell was also solid, and I was impressed with how he managed to restrain himself from imbruing his character with any sense that perhaps there might be redeeming qualities of some sort beneath the surface. He was completely loathsome and unpleasant (IMHO), not something every actor is willing to embrace
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Jane Eyre (2011)