CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Galaxy Quest, the accidental classic
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Galaxy Quest, the accidental classic

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 

So we all know this is a great film, but after rewatching it this weekend, I'm still not sure how. I thought I'd examine it a bit. It's not a particularly novel concept; it's Three Amigos meets Star Trek, exactly. The cast is excellent, sure, but it stars Tim Allen. The director is Dean Parisot, whose other two films (Home Fries and Fun With Dick and Jane) are pretty much junk. It's a very pretty Blu Ray, but not a very pretty movie, aping the original Star Trek series as it does. And yet somehow, it belongs in a tier with Ghostbusters.

 

David Mamet has called this a film with perfect structure, and he is of course right. Every single plot thread is paid off, every single character has a successful character arc, and every scene works towards one or both of those things. Whoever cast this deserved a big bonus too. There's almost a dozen characters here, and they're all perfectly played. In some cases, I think the entire reason some of them work so well are the actors involved. Sam Rockwell absolutely kills it, when on paper, there's almost no character to speak of at all, by design. And yet he becomes one of the most identifiable people on the screen. Similarly, Enrico Colantoni, who plays the Thermian leader Mathusar, basically makes a role that is mostly exposition into the emotional lynchpin of the film. And they're both ridiculously funny. And there's Tim Allen, an actor whom I've never liked at all, starting with Home Improvement and going on to forever (save Buzz Lightyear, fine). He's perfect here, nailing the Kirkness of the role without ever once being tempted to Shatner it up at all. He's also playing an annoying boob without ever actually being annoying. Apparently, Mamet was such a fan that he gave him the role in Redbelt because of this movie. Even Justin Long is completely endearing here. And there's no need to even mention Alan Rickman, Sigourney Weaver, or Tony Shalhoub. They're all just kicking so much ass.

 

The direction never really distinguishes itself in any specific or showy way, and yet, it's perfect. Exactly what's called for. Parisot nails the exact tone for each scene, finds the exact right degree of seriousness in every exchange, and yet also, the movie is consistently hilarious, even though it doesn't even have that many jokes in it. I take this as either an example of pure kismet, where everything on the set just went totally right, or maybe more likely, a strong example of how talented even a nameless journeyman director can be, in the right circumstances. The rumor is that Harold Ramis was originally scheduled to direct, but clashed vehemently over the casting of Tim Allen (Ramis wanted Steve Martin). What's strange about this is that sight unseen, this trade off would seem like a crippling mistake on the studio's part, but I can't imagine this alternate version, with personal favorites Ramis and Martin, ever living up to what we got instead. 

 

But really, despite the perfect structure and creative players, I wonder if it comes down to the loving genre details. I'm not a huge Trekkie, but like any good nerd, I've certainly got some affection for the property and the cast members. And I think this is where the Colantoni character comes in. Galaxy Quest is ultimately about vindication. It's a movie that's largely about how much the silly little scifi show ultimately meant to someone, well beyond the scope ever imagined by it's creators. It's writ large here (the fate of an alien civilization, no less), but it's cathartic, I think, to see the actors assume the mantle the fan community has invested in them. And they get to see their fake example inspiring real life motivation. Even the Galaxy Quest theme song, which starts as a parody of tinny heroic TV themes, becomes downright stirring by the end, because then it's real, and has meaning. 

 

Well, I think it's great anyway.

post #2 of 19

This is going to be me just reiterating your first post, Arjen.

 

Kismet seems to be the huge factor here.  This perfectly structured script could've easily been turned into something fine but unmemorable. 

 

This isn't to take away anything from everyone involved in the film.  But there does seem to be a magic here.  We have hindsight to back it up, but how excited would we be to hear about Tim Allen attached to star in this high concept premise?  Not so much.

 

The irreverent (but not mocking) tone is another factor.  It doesn't feel like it's pulling its punches all the while it's displaying so much love for what it's based on.  And that love feels genuine.

post #3 of 19

Basically agree with everything you say, but you didn't mention the script much at all, and I reckon that's the real key. Other than the performances I'm fairly sure the bulk of what makes this great was right there on the page.

post #4 of 19

Yeah, I remember back then having to sell people on it despite Tim Allen. "Yeah he stars in it but it's fucking good and he's actually good in it."

 

Rockwell and Shalhoub walk away with it, though, for me. Shalhoub in particular is so fucking hilariously "eh, whatever," the anti-Scotty.

post #5 of 19

Arjen, great post. I don't have a lot of specifics to add, but I fully agree. This is a film that really grows on repeat viewings, and its quiet genius - yeah, I'll use that word - becomes more apparent as you know the film better. In a lot of ways, GQ is a cinematic cousin or step-sibling to Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels; both are parodies of a genre, but while having fun with tropes and convention, they're never mean, and actually show a lot love for basic forms and elements. GALAXY QUEST is both a spot-on satire of the original Star Trek's legacy and fandom while also being a love letter to the series. The satire's smart and funny and never falls into SCARY MOVIE territory, and the homage/love letter part shows in that the characters are all treated with respect and love. It's a film I don't own yet watch whenever I catch it on TV, and I always love it.

post #6 of 19

Can't remember who or where but I remember someone making an interesting point about this movie, saying that one little thing that sums up its appeal is during the sequence where they have to get to the engine core or whatever. There's a short bit where they have the characters, and by extension the audience, stop for a sec and unironically gaze in wonder at whatever fancy thing powers the ship. It was just an example of how, even though it's all poking fun, at its heart the movie isn't cynical about the genre in the slightest.

post #7 of 19

Arjen Rudd, Galaxy Quest is the Best...Star Trek Film, that Paramount didn't produce!  The cast, the uniforms, David Newman's...Awesome Score, and the concept the filmmakers were huge fans of...Star Trek!  Tim Allen...IS William Shatner's James Tiberius Kirk!  Other things that I...Love, about Galaxy Quest was the humor, the sense of adventure and...The Rock Monster are all spot on.  The only negative I find with Galaxy Quest is there never was a...Sequel!

post #8 of 19

WRATH OF KHAN excepted, GALAXY QUEST is, IMNSHO, better than every other TREK movie, including '09 (and I unapologetically really dig that one).

post #9 of 19

Again, I'm not the first to point this out, but Galaxy Quest and Star Trek 09 are tonally quite similar in a lot of ways.

post #10 of 19
Thread Starter 

I seem to recall JJ Abrams saying that Galaxy Quest was his favorite Star Trek movie, but I could be misremembering that. 

 

It is a damn good script, but it's also the kind of high concept premise that almost never results in a great movie. There aren;t really any ingenious ideas or characters here (well, Rockwell's pretty close), it's just the execution is perfect across the board. In a sense, the existence of movies like Galaxy Quest suggest there's no reason something like, say, Aliens in the Attic can't be a great movie. It's just really unusual.

post #11 of 19

I found this on the film's IMDB trivia page:

Quote:
In the Audio Commentary for "Star Trek (2009)", during the sequence where Kirk and Sulu are falling toward Vulcan without a parachute, Director J.J. Abrams says, "By the way, I think we've all gone on record as saying one of our favorite 'Trek' films is 'Galaxy Quest'. And this sequence is clearly an homage to Tony Shalhoub's great save in that film."

 

Arjen's post prompted me to throw in the DVD.  Another thing that should be pointed out: the mix of CG and practical FX have aged VERY well. 

post #12 of 19

The Galaxy Quest E! Documentary

 

post #13 of 19

I dreaded seeing this with my sisters on Christmas Day.  We always see a film together, and they were dying to see this.  I was dying to see anything BUT this.  Tim Allen in a Star Trek satire?!?  Terrible.  I love seeing some Alan Rickman, but he must need a check.  And I wasn't even a movie snob back then.

 

And the movie was everything mentioned above.  It was a great adventure, a great comedy, a great satire.  It was sweet and moving, while having moments of awe and danger, intersprinkled amongst some very hysterical bits.

 

Easily sits among the great comedies I grew up with in the 80s.  I've been pimping this movie since it came out, and have met precious few people who didn't love it.

 

Most of the Trek cast had great praise for the movie, although I think it's better than even that.  It is absolutely a classic.  The best comedies are the ones that effectively retain their humor rewatch after rewatch.  The timeless ones have you laughing in anticipation of an upcoming line or gag.

 

"You have a last name, Guy."

 

"Do I ?!?!  DO I ?!?!?"  His screech during this delivery is still one of the funniest things I have ever heard.

post #14 of 19
Thank God they had the actors play it straight. I thought it was going to be a farce when I saw the ads for it.
post #15 of 19

Not mentioned enough: the scene where they trick the villain and pull his ship into the asteroid field. Beyond just the visceral, triumphant perfection of that scene, and the fact that it pays off an earlier set-up, is the reaction that the villain has.

 

When else do you get to see a giant lizard monster show fear?

 

This movie is great.

post #16 of 19

I agree with Paul C. The movie is a very funny comedy, but the moment they gaze at the Omega 13 is the finishing touch in legitimizing it as a sci-fi movie, too. The world and the events are never the joke, just the characters and what makes them do the things they do in each of the scenes.

 

I remember being surprised that two of my friends didn't find it funny way back when, like eight years ago or something. I wonder if their opinion would change now that they seem to have watched all of the various "Star Trek" series and the new movie's come and gone. Of course, I haven't seen "Star Trek," so...

post #17 of 19

I love Galaxy Quest so much, especially Alan Rickman ("I was an actor once...") and Sigourney Weaver ("Look, I have one job on this lousy ship.  It's stupid, but I'm gonna do it, ok?") but everybody else is so good.  I think its greatness is that it embraces everything about the Star Trek phenomenon, warts and all, in an affectionately funny way without looking down on it.  It's sincere.  Dreamworks totally screwed up the release of this movie, and I didn't even end up seeing it in a theater.  Every time it comes on cable I watch it.  Funny, brilliant movie.  Great post, Arjen Rudd. 

post #18 of 19

I just managed to DVR this and am watching it now.  It's perfect. 

post #19 of 19

It's also a big love letter to Trek fandom, and fandom in general -- their devotion, their appreciation, and their ability to keep something alive through both.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Galaxy Quest, the accidental classic