Quote:
Originally Posted by
Farsight 
The process was followed correctly. There were three "tamper-proof" seals that were never broken. The sample was stored in a cool place. Their policy is to not leave samples at a FedEx office for 2 days when you can instead keep it in the custody of the paid health professional.
Apparently, Braun's lawyers convinced the arbitrator that because a FedEx was open, the tester failed in not taking the sample there immediately. But FedEx doesn't ship on Saturday afternoon. Or Sunday. So Braun's team convinced the arbitrator that leaving the sample in FedEx's back room for 2 days was preferable to keeping it with the professional you trusted to take the sample in the first place. That's goofy.
It'd be interesting to see what the arbitrator based the decision on, because there's been nothing presented by either side that puts the process in doubt.
There are so few "facts" that are actually known that I don't see how we can definitively say what actually happened, other than there was a delay in shipping. A "cool place" can mean a refrigerator, a cooler in the garage, or a tupperware container in a basement. I'd argue that you'd potentially get a different result from the same sample depending on which "cool place" was actually used.
If for no other reason, this is a good example of why locking down handling procedures is important. The "what to do with a sample collected on a weekend" problem is certainly something that could have and should have been foreseen. You always want to get a sample to a lab as soon as possible.
The arbitrator will never release his decision publicly. This isn't a court of law or a public record. There is no public record of what the case actually was. We're all relying on hearsay. And, let's face it, sports journalism is notoriously unreliable as far as this goes.