CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Four Rooms (1995)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Four Rooms (1995)

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 

So strange to think this is Grindhouse before Grindhouse. Marking the first time Rodriguez and Tarantino collaborated as directors together, Four Rooms is not entirely successful but is worth a look for the novelty. Tim Roth as Ted the Bellhop is the only constant in this anthology that chronicles New Years Eve and four separate vignettes dealing with four rooms and situations.

 

The latter two stories, directed by Rodriguez and Tarantino, are the most successful whereas the first two are uninspired. "The Missing Ingredient" could have been something special, as it features a coven of beautiful actresses, including Madonna, as witches attempting to summon their goddess. There's a nice blend of swinging '60s quirk during this segment, but it's mostly awkward and stilted. The second segment, "The Wrong Man" is just bizarre and drawn out. David Proval as Sigfried isn't unhinged enough to be a jealous husband, and aside from a clever use of transitions between scenes and rooms (including a cool shot of Ted stuck in a window) this one's a snooze.

 

"The Misbehavers" is the most successful, but I couldn't tell if the kids were real trouble or Ted was just being a jerk to them. The final shot, when Banderas gets back, is classic. "The Man from Hollywood", meanwhile, has a great concept but is too drawn out. Tarantino has a gift of building tension through dialogue, but unfortunately he's off his game here. The zippo lighter bet should've been introduced much earlier. As is there's about twenty minutes of Tarantino either improvving or delivering his own dialogue badly (his joke in Desperado is much better) and Bruce Willis yelling at the phone before a plot materializes. The other segments are based entirely around hook, drawing you in from the start, but this final segment tricks you into staying around with false promises that don't really deliver. 

 

Roth as Ted is hit-and-miss. I love the actor, but he relies too much on Chaplin-esque shuffling and quirky reactions here. It's hard to tell, as well, if he's intended to have any story arc. All we know through the first two segments is that he smokes, doesn't care much for the guests, and is a bit of a coward. Is it suggested that he's a push over at the beginning and stands up for himself when he cuts off the pinky at the end? Only Rodriguez knows how to direct Roth here, playing up a more ruthless angle on the character. Otherwise he felt like something out of a sitcom.

 

Worth a look for the perfect storm of talent, but mostly an ambitious failure. 

 

 

post #2 of 9

The Misbehavers was the only segment I revisited from the film.  That and the finale of Tarantino's segment. 

 

My friend and I will still mimic the "WHAT THE FUCK!?" Roth delivers while puking his guts out.

 

"IMPOSSIBLE!  You've got the ointment on your eyes!  Ya CAN'T.  SEE.  SHIT!!!!"

post #3 of 9

You are 1000% wrong about the David Proval segment. 1000!!

 

ETA - And also about Tim Roth's performance. It's masterful! Criticizing someone for a Chaplin-esque performance? For shame! 

 

ETAx2 - The only thing wrong with the movie is the sequence with the witches. It's unwatchable and as the opener, it sinks the film. At least if memory serves correct. I should probably revisit.

post #4 of 9
Thread Starter 

I agree that not only should the witch segment have been more well done, but could have been placed later in the narrative. As is, the movie doesn't prepare us for such supernatural circumstances so soon after the relatively down-to-earth cold opening. The second segment would've been a better way to ease us in (although I stand by all my above statements about the quality of Proval's performance).

 

Also, why is the movie set on New Years Eve? It has little to do with the plot, as Banderas could have been going to any party. Also as a former bellman I don't believe Ted would be left there alone to run the place. Also, Kathy Griffin is horrible in the two minutes she's in the movie, trying some '40s startlet accent that doesn't work. 

post #5 of 9

On Netflix instant in HD.

post #6 of 9
Thread Starter 

Yes sir, that's where I watched it. 

 

Also, David Proval is like a not-cross eyed-enough Dan Hedaya. 

post #7 of 9

Four Rooms is good but it ain't "Bronson Pinchot in Blame It On The Bellboy" good.

post #8 of 9

Say what you will about the movie, but the score by Combustible Edison is great stuff. 

post #9 of 9

This is the only thing that Tarantino has done that I don't flatout love.  It's an admirable and interesting failure.....................which is really the best kind of misfire one can have.

 

On a side note, I'd love for Quentin to work with Tim Roth again some day.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › Four Rooms (1995)