CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › Smoking ban in films: Is it uncalled for?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Smoking ban in films: Is it uncalled for?

post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 

The latest notification issued by the government on smoking scenes in films and television programmes have left filmmakers fuming over the 'absurd' guidelines. CT takes a look at the debate, its genesis and what it means for showbusiness

For a few years now, the government has been trying to introduce guidelines to ban smoking cigarettes in films. Finally, in October, the government issued a notification, ordering all films, as well as TV programmes, to have health warnings at the beginning and in the middle of the film/show.


Edited by Fred Muller - 3/12/12 at 3:32am
post #2 of 13

And shooting people in film/TV continues to be a-ok.

Priorities are out of whack.

post #3 of 13

I don't recall seeing a health warning last night during Raising Hope.  I do recall seeing Andrew Dice Clay smoking through most every scene he was in and thinking "Thank god these people aren't pussies regarding showing someone smoking a (if I am not mistaken, still legal) cigarette. 

 

I totally agree with Nexus-7. Priorities way out of whack.

post #4 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexus-7 View Post

And shooting people in film/TV continues to be a-ok.

Priorities are out of whack.



That's the dichotomy the leaps out at me.

 

These are supposed to be stories, not visual guides to living healthy, virtuous lives.

post #5 of 13

All these points are bang on the money. However, sex, murder etc. are fun to watch while smoking is one of the very few things left in daily life that people are allowed to hate and keep the moral high ground. Never mind the fact that smoking is portrayed as a part of daily life, which is part of the mandate of art; now by indicating that people out in the world smoke, you're advertising A GREAT EVIL THAT MUST BE STOPPED. Even better, if you try and defend this people are now trained to jump to the conclusion that you're also endorsing the habit.  That's why I think the PC Brigade are eventually going to win this one, as much as I hate to admit it. Everyone wants to watch murder and no-one wants fucking swept under the carpet, but smoking? Well, that's the only indefensible thing left.

 

I propose that, when the inevitable worldwide blanket ban happens, every time filmmakers want to show someone lighting up they just have the character pick their nose and eat it. Then when people complain, say "Well, it could've been worse. They could've smoked."

 

Damn, I'm in a cynical mood tonight.

post #6 of 13

Health warnings at the beginning(and only the beginning) I can take, though I do think it's absolutely absurd - complete banning I can't or, as idiot anti smoking groups are trying to do here, make any film that shows a ciggie to automatically get an 18 rating... so for example if Alice in Wonderland(animation) was released in cinemas now say, it would be an 18 if they got their way. See how bloody ridiculous that is...

 

Thankfully the moronic idea will probably never happen.

 

And frankly, if someone wants to smoke, what on earth has it got to do with anyone else... not our fault they are easily influenced by someone smoking on screen...

 

Oh, and I'm not a smoker.

 

post #7 of 13

In L.A., if you want to watch a movie that portrays smoking, you have to do it outside and at least 20 feet from a building entrance.

post #8 of 13
As someone who has smoked in the past, watching other people smoke does tingle my nerves slightly. That said, it comes down to WILL POWER! Not big brother doing shit for you.
post #9 of 13

I've long said that of all the deeply unhealthy aspects of the American lifestyle, the fanatical focus on smoking as the great evil of our society is all part of a con desgined to allow people to think they're on top of their health when in fact it's everything else in their diet, air and water that's killing them

 

Smoking is just a lifestyle choice, and a pretty darn nifty one to boot. It's undeniably cool, looks fantastic, and feels great. It's also damn cinematic. The awful, manipulative and often grotesque unskippable anti smoking ads in films bother me to no end, but these new guidelines cross the line to an absurd degree

 

My feelings on smoking have been made clear

 

But smoking on screen should be here to stay

 

PS IMHO smoking is going to make a HUGE comeback in the next few decades. Why? 1) As cancer fighting/preventing technologies improve, the risk will be seen as a less serious consideration 2) As our environment spirals into decline, and the world falls into chaos, people will want to indulge in simple comforts, and the "death wish" aspect of living dangerously with cigs will seem cool and counter cultural

post #10 of 13

I think smoking in movies can't increase the number of smoking people. So it's no need to ban it ;) Cigs4girls.com

post #11 of 13

Yeah, that's fucking ridiculous, but that's never stopped the government before, why should it now?

 

By the way, what's the link for this article?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

post #12 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post

 

These are supposed to be stories, not visual guides to living healthy, virtuous lives.



For me it all comes down to this simple point. I absolutely detest smoking on every level, but it's part of everyday life and thus seems silly to remove it from art.

post #13 of 13

If true, I think it's stupid. Cigarettes have been getting a lot of crap in the media lately, but alcohol goes untouched. Tit for tat I say.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movie Miscellany
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › Smoking ban in films: Is it uncalled for?