CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 

This is one of my top ten movies of all time. I absolutely ADORE every single thing about it. Not only is it the best stop motion animated movie ever made, it's also one of the best musicals and one of the best Christmas AND Halloween movies. If I see this playing in a nearby  theater, I have to go. I know that its reputation has been sullied by Hipster/Emo/Goth scum who wear clothes and accessories adorned with characters from the movie, but even their noxious attention of Nightmare can't do anything to diminish my love for this masterpiece.

 

TNBC and Ed Wood represent Tim Burton at the height of his powers, when he found creative outlets for his Gothic style of eccentric and macabre storytelling that didn't include remakes and rehashes.  Mars Attacks feels like the end of the Tim Burton who made films like Beetlejuice and Pee-Wee's Big Adventure and although I LOVE Sweeney Todd, it felt like a rare return to form from someone who can be a great Director despite what his detractors say.

 

But I feel like we'll never get anything with the sheer exuberant joy that I feel from The Nightmare Before Christmas as Dark Shadows and his feature length stop motion version of Frankenweenie seems to indicate that Burton is once again aiming low as he has been for the last 15 years.

post #2 of 19

I agree, except Tim Burton didn't direct it. He's not responsible for what works in this film at all.

post #3 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCE View Post

I agree, except Tim Burton didn't direct it. He's not responsible for what works in this film at all.



Yeah, I know Selick was technically the "Director" but this was Burton's baby. Furthermore, Selick hasn't done anything at this level since. But then neither has Burton (I HATE Corpse Bride). So let's just say that Nightmare was the meeting of right mined people. But I would give more credit to Burton for A: coming up with the story - B: Hiring Michael McDowell (Beetlejuice) and Caroline Thompson (Edward Scissorhands) to script it - C: Bringing Danny Elfman onto the project - D: Bringing together most of the vocal talent from his previous movies.

 

So, despite your revisionist history, claiming that Burton isn't "responsible for what works in this film at all." is disingenuous at best or outright lying at worst.

post #4 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tax Master View Post

Furthermore, Selick hasn't done anything at this level since.


Okay, you flat-out don't know what you're talking about:

 

Coraline_poster.jpg

 

Coraline is a higher achievement than Nightmare on pretty much every level, and has the added benefit of not having been co-opted by angsty Hot Topic customers.

post #5 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tax Master View Post

Yeah, I know Selick was technically the "Director" but this was Burton's baby. Furthermore, Selick hasn't done anything at this level since. But then neither has Burton (I HATE Corpse Bride). So let's just say that Nightmare was the meeting of right mined people. But I would give more credit to Burton for A: coming up with the story - B: Hiring Michael McDowell (Beetlejuice) and Caroline Thompson (Edward Scissorhands) to script it - C: Bringing Danny Elfman onto the project - D: Bringing together most of the vocal talent from his previous movies.

 

So, despite your revisionist history, claiming that Burton isn't "responsible for what works in this film at all." is disingenuous at best or outright lying at worst.


It was an dream project he had, but always lacked the talent/ability/time to fully realise, so handed it over to Selick. Everything people like about this film is created by somebody else and Burton has since taken the majority credit for it being 'his'. Burton has yet to display the sheer wit and ingenuity in any film before or since. But James and the Giant Peach, Coraline and even Monkeybone all have it.

 

From wiki:

Caroline Thompson still had yet to be hired to write the screenplay. With Thompson's screenplay, Selick stated, "there are very few lines of dialogue that are Caroline's. She became busy on other films and we were constantly rewriting, reconfiguring and developing the film visually."
 
On the direction of the film, Selick reflected, "It's as though he laid the egg, and I sat on it and hatched it. He wasn't involved in a hands-on way, but his hand is in it. It was my job to make it look like "a Tim Burton film", which is not so different from my own films." When asked on Burton's involvement, Selick claimed, "I don't want to take away from Tim, but he was not in San Francisco when we made it. He came up five times over two years, and spent no more than eight or ten days in total."

 

post #6 of 19

I enjoy the music, and all in all it's a perfectly charming tale. Props to Mr Selick for what works, after CORALINE I am confident he was the driving force behind what I like most in this film

 

FACT: I was forbidden to view this film upon it's release in 1993, even though many of my friends were allowed to go see it

 

 

 

post #7 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post


Okay, you flat-out don't know what you're talking about:

 

Coraline_poster.jpg

 

Coraline is a higher achievement than Nightmare on pretty much every level, and has the added benefit of not having been co-opted by angsty Hot Topic customers.


We're really gonna hold the Hot Topic thing against Nightmare? Really? It's still a terrific film in my eyes.

 

Coraline is indeed excellent, though I'd rank it about equal with Nightmare (they're both great, but in different ways).

 

post #8 of 19

CORALINE's use of 3D is truly ingenious. Watch the special features on the DVD. I wrote about it on my blog before (sadly lost), but the did fascinating things with the miniature set construction to play tricks on your sense of space

post #9 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Spider View Post

We're really gonna hold the Hot Topic thing against Nightmare? Really?



I was just taking the piss there.  But I do get a little tired of the goth girls who moon over Jack.

post #10 of 19

Considering most were still shitting their diapers when the film was released. The movie, while I did enjoy it when I was younger has been marketed to DEATH.

post #11 of 19

I think it's a fantastic little musical (for which it owes a huge debt to Danny Elfman), but the story really shits the bed near the end.  Jack just sort of shrugs off this whole journey he's been on -- he literally sings, "And what the heck, I really did my best" -- and goes back to Halloween Town with the biggest lesson seeming to be, "You are who you are, don't try anything new."

 

Meanwhile, Coraline was based on a story by Neil Gaiman.  Nightmare is never going to win that battle.

post #12 of 19

I know everyone loves to hate Burton now but let's not pretend he was *never* good. Not to diminish Selick's contribution but it was Burton's story and his sensibilities are all over the thing. If you've ever seen his drawings this movie is like watching them come to life. I doubt Elfman would've been involved if not for Burton, and he really peaked on this thing.

post #13 of 19

As Selick stated above, it was all about making it 'look like a Tim Burton movie'. Sure, it looks like his drawings, but he didn't do much beyond assembling the key creative crew. 

 

Ed Wood, Pee Wee, Beetlejuice, Mars Attacks and Edward Scissorhands are his best films. Beetlejuice has the kind of bouncy vitality that Nightmare has, but mostly because of Michael Keaton, who I imagine doesn't need an awful lot of direction to do what he does. 

post #14 of 19

He storyboarded bits of it and provided the character designs, which were rendered incredibly faithfully. And wrote the story and got his usual collaborators to write and score. If someone else had directed it it most likely would turned out similar in a lot of ways.

post #15 of 19

I'll disagree with this, and leave it at that. I don't see how he contributed to anything beyond the bones of a story and some sketches. I just think its very insulting to the people who did work on this and who are often completely overlooked because of 'Burton'.

post #16 of 19

I don't think anyone is saying Burton deserves no credit it all.  It's just that too many people want to give him ALL the credit, and that's just not fair to the considerable amount of talent Selick brought to the table.

post #17 of 19

He doesn't deserve all the credit by any means, but 'just contributing the bones of a story and some sketches' is going absurdly far in the other direction. His aesthetic and sensibilities are absolutely key to the film, it would and could not have existed in any form without his contribution as creator, designer and producer.

post #18 of 19

See, I think if the characters looked different then it would still be good, because of all the work of other people. Looking at Selicks other work, it could have been designed slightly more like that and work just as well.

post #19 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C View Post

He doesn't deserve all the credit by any means, but 'just contributing the bones of a story and some sketches' is going absurdly far in the other direction. His aesthetic and sensibilities are absolutely key to the film, it would and could not have existed in any form without his contribution as creator, designer and producer.


 

Agreed. This is Tim Burton's baby through and through. Obviously Henry Selick did a great job directing but I think this film would've worked no matter who was at the helm. I will say, I think Danny Elfman deserves at least as much credit as Selick for it is his songs that move the story forward and where the film is the most alive.

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › Films in Release or On Video › The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)