For example, I remember seeing a few film that were terrible, but the Director of Photography brought in the eye candy to such a degree that the film was still watchable. I almost feel like this is a bigger achievement than being recognized for doing good, but not great work in a critically acclaimed movie.
So post the films you think have some great work done on them that went unrecognized because the film itself wasn't good.
For the record and to quell any arguments a film is considered "bad" if it is rated less than 50 on Metacritic or listed as rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. One or the other, it doesn't have to be both.
1. The bad film: Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010)
What's great about it: The 3D Cinematography
I was practically dragged to see this film by friend because it was her birthday and I was only in town for a short time. While I found the film fitted my expectations (I didn't expect anything from it and It didn't give me anything in return) I have to say I was flabbergasted by the 3D Cinematography and would honsetly say that if given a choice to pay to see it again in the theaters in 3D I would do it just to witness the opening credits again. So few films have done 3D as well as Afterlife did in it's opening credit sequence of night time Tokyo in the rain. The movement of umbrellas just grabs you like a Busby Berkeley musical number, then draws your eyes and forces you to notice the one figure standing motionless without an umbrella.
I have yet to see 3D do anything as arresting as this and even Hugo didn't reach the heights of Afterlife's opening sequence.










