CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN post release discussion
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN post release discussion - Page 17

post #801 of 1215

Nothing in this movie even approaches "emo".  Yes, not even tonally.  The reality is so far removed from the accusations it's not even funny.  There's more to argue about with the BB comparisons, but Twilight?  No.  Sorry, but there's no comparison.

 

I think Webb approaches the supposed "angst" from a genuine enough place for the comparisons to be invalid, at least.

post #802 of 1215

No comparison to Twilight? Seriously? Then I feel like I watched another movie or something, because the one that I just watched rested almost entirely on a shallow romance posing as super-love between a broody super-powered teen and a girl who falls for guys who do nothing apart from proving themselves to be dangerous and mysterious.

post #803 of 1215

Stone and Garfield have about a million times more chemistry than Pattinson and Stewart, for one thing.

 

Is any love story going to be dismissed as Twilight now?

post #804 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post

Stone and Garfield have about a million times more chemistry than Pattinson and Stewart, for one thing.

But doesn't that come down to execution?

post #805 of 1215

And I'm not denying that they had better chemistry. It definitely elevates the romance as written.

post #806 of 1215

I don't know, it just feels like everyone had Twilight and Batman Begins and "emo" loaded up before the film ever came out, and is just bound and determined to fire those shots regardless of whether they really apply or not.

post #807 of 1215

Emo does NOT apply.  Emo is an asthetic, like goth for the tween crowd who's not quite serious enough.  It's dark bangs and dark clothes.  It's a My Chemical Romance no one understands me asthetic.  It's why Peter Parker in Spiderman 3 adopts the traditional "emo" bangs, it's his hilarious mish mash of cultural "bad edgy dude cliches" along with the black suit and saturday night fever moves.

 

Emo IS posing, and it's all about a look.  Teenagers being angsty?  That's not fucking emo, that's the universal teenage experience for christs sake.

post #808 of 1215
Yeah, this movie isn't emo. It's just plain regular old bad. Totally lifeless and perfunctory -- there's just no heart in this thing at all. Basically the antithesis of the Raimi movies, no matter how much this film apes them at times.

What my hopes are slightly up for is a sequel where Jason Isaacs gets to play Norman Osborne. If that isn't ideal casting then there is no such thing.
post #809 of 1215

OMG!  You NAILED it!

post #810 of 1215

I haven't seen this yet.  The major obstacle, apart from the retread factor, is simply that it looks like the most anonymous committee made film yet.

For comparison, people were saying Dredd doesn't seem too promising, which is true, but they at least went and got Anthony Dodd Mantle and told him to go nuts with the colours like always. TASm just looks rote.  Like the movie version of a TV series I haven't seen.  I guess I'm superficial like that.  Anyway...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post

 

Ok, let's take how Peter is portrayed in both films. In Raimi's film he is this "Golly gee" almost anachronistic character, very close to what we'd find in the early comics, and as pointed out, the sort of teenager that really doesn't exist any more, and didn't really exist in 2002 either. It is an idealized version of a "nerd". The new Peter is presented to us as the sort of kid we'd actually find in a modern high school, in a world where "nerd" doesn't mean uncool. It goes beyond just modernization, it's putting Peter directly in OUR WORLD, and not the more idealized world of Raimi's. I'm not saying this is a bad thing, but the approach here is clearly more grounded in our reality. And that's just how the main character is presented.

 

This kind of fascinates me.  The movie moan crowd were talking about this too and I find it very odd.  It's as if people are saying there are no outcasts anymore, no awkward people.  That's from a bygone era.  Everyone is cool and well adjusted and handsome now, even the "nerds".  This notion actually started with the first Spiderman, I seem to recall.  The great exemplar I never forgot  was a red carpet stop by Gene frikkin Simmons talking about how he was a geek at school and how geeks are on top now  and buy his books and attend his talks on how you too can bang a supermodel every week, or something. I think that was the gist.

Really when Kiss are laying claim to outsider status it's time to rethink the boundaries a little.  The majors jump on grunge and industrial it doesn't mean the underground is now the mainstream.  There's a new underground somewhere else.

(great now I've derailed it into hipster and cool talk, potentially, but hopefully that makes some sense)

I did go along for a time thinking maybe it might actually be true that nerds were now cool, until I caught a recent low budget doc someone local made about Bronies (yes) at her school. 

Let me tell ya, they're still around.  And they're not cool.  Ohohoh so not cool.

 

So while I haven't seen it yet, my feeling is that suggesting this take on Peter Parker is some how up to date and connected with da yoof is way overdoing it.  It's actually the same old same old, as it has been since "teenage" movies and shows in the fifties and ever after.  Youth oriented protagonists, even if they were sympathetic outsiders afflicted with "real problems", have always been thinly disguised handsome charismatic go-getters.   You cast a wider net that way and get more viewers.  Aspirational and relatable at the same time, so the theory goes (and embittered outsider kids ( o/ ) will remain unconvinced by the charade).

We shouldn't kid ourselves that its current and realistic in any spectacularly (sorry) original way. If they wanted to make Parker a real outsider they could, but it not a Todd Solondz movie.

But I haven't been near a school in a long time, nor seen the movie so...

post #811 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeman View Post

Emo does NOT apply.  Emo is an asthetic, like goth for the tween crowd who's not quite serious enough.  It's dark bangs and dark clothes.  It's a My Chemical Romance no one understands me asthetic.  It's why Peter Parker in Spiderman 3 adopts the traditional "emo" bangs, it's his hilarious mish mash of cultural "bad edgy dude cliches" along with the black suit and saturday night fever moves.

 

Emo IS posing, and it's all about a look.  Teenagers being angsty?  That's not fucking emo, that's the universal teenage experience for christs sake.

 

Emo as a term branched out in the mid-80's from punk by bands that took the angst of punk and started to focus it inwards. The association you're talking about - the emo aesthetic - is actually a more recent thing. Anyway, like punk or hipster, "emo" can be used to signify music, culture, an aesthetic and an attitude, which is what I'm talking about. Man, semantic arguments are tiring.

post #812 of 1215

I haven't seen this movie, and to be honest I'm not in a hurry to, but I saw this comment on twitter a while back which made me chuckle.

 

 

Quote:
For some odd reason, seeing made me want to buy a Sony TV. & Sony phone & Sony PC & Sony camera.
post #813 of 1215

Really? Didn't seem that obvious to me.

post #814 of 1215

Yeah the only product placement that stood out to me was Peter doing internet searches with Bing, which is the most unbelievable thing in the film. 

post #815 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by grubstreeter View Post

Yeah the only product placement that stood out to me was Peter doing internet searches with Bing, which is the most unbelievable thing in the film. 


What no extreme close up of a Dr Pepper can godthismovuiesucks!

post #816 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by grubstreeter View Post

Yeah the only product placement that stood out to me was Peter doing internet searches with Bing, which is the most unbelievable thing in the film. 


It just made me think of Comedy Bang Bang: "Please, if you're going to Bing something, use Google."

post #817 of 1215
This was a much better movie than Sam Raimi made. It is more serious and more like the comic. I hope they do the clone story since it could be a whole trilogy and have the Jackal and Gwen clone. Maybe Miles Warren was the shadowy figure and he is helping Norman work out the clone degeneration serum?
post #818 of 1215

Everybody out of the thread. THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU.
 

post #819 of 1215
It was a valid point.
post #820 of 1215
It was a valid point.
post #821 of 1215

No call for the Clone saga will ever be a "valid point", although I'm sure they could put some interesting homoerotic subtext in there for you to work yourself into a lather about.

 

Oh man I can't wait for newer posters to rally round and chide me for mocking this guy right out of the gate. Hint for the Dracos and ccccs of the thread: this has nothing to do with me not liking THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN.
 

post #822 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post

No call for the Clone saga will ever be a "valid point", although I'm sure they could put some interesting homoerotic subtext in there for you to work yourself into a lather about.

 

Oh man I can't wait for newer posters to rally round and chide me for mocking this guy right out of the gate. Hint for the Dracos and ccccs of the thread: this has nothing to do with me not liking THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN.
 

 

There is nothing homosexual about the clone story, which was read by everyone and one of the most famous Spiderman stories. And the Jackal is like the Joker so everyone would love him. Why are you being so obtuse?
post #823 of 1215

That's true, I do remember back in the 90s when you couldn't get on a subway train without being surrounded by thirty or forty copies of Amazing Spider-Man #399. It's like the modern-day Bible, that Clone Saga.
 

Jackal was totally gay for Peter Parker, by the way. Why do you think he was trying to grow so many copies of him? CLONE ORGY.

post #824 of 1215
That wasn't about being gay, it was about ruining Pater Parker's life.
post #825 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

That wasn't about being gay, it was about ruining Pater Parker's life.

 

By putting his winky in him.

post #826 of 1215
You sir are a troll of the highest order.
post #827 of 1215

You just don't get subtext, man. You're going to have to work on that before SYNCHRONIZED goes into production.
 

post #828 of 1215
My scripts for THE EXORCIST: SYNCHRONIZED and LORD OF THE RINGS 4: RETURN OF THE SHADOW are fantastic, but I think I may need to make them original characters since Warner Brothers is very uptight about letting other people make movies of their stuff. I understand subtext better than you think since SYNCHRONIZED is full of it.
post #829 of 1215

Never change, David Morgan. Keep reaching for that rainbow-coloured crucific dildo.
 

post #830 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post

Everybody out of the thread. THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU.
 

 

 

....except in this case, Ronnie writes classy Exorcist Rule 34.

post #831 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

My scripts for THE EXORCIST: SYNCHRONIZED and LORD OF THE RINGS 4: RETURN OF THE SHADOW are fantastic, but I think I may need to make them original characters since Warner Brothers is very uptight about letting other people make movies of their stuff. 

 

Well, it worked for Dennis McKiernan...

post #832 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

This was a much better movie than Sam Raimi made. It is more serious and more like the comic. I hope they do the clone story since it could be a whole trilogy and have the Jackal and Gwen clone. Maybe Miles Warren was the shadowy figure and he is helping Norman work out the clone degeneration serum?

Ohhh cool your back, WELCOME.

post #833 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post

 

Well, it worked for Dennis McKiernan...

 

I agree. He built a very successful writing career out of modifying his sequels since he couldn't get rights. This way, I can rewrite all the EXORCIST movies and then do my sequel my way, and maybe even do it better than I planned. Same with LORD OF THE RINGS 4.
post #834 of 1215

Your greatest creation, David Morgan, is your elaborate, phony internet persona. The craziest thing about you is that you think perpetuating this identity is a worthwhile expenditure of your creativity. You just don't get those kinds of hits, dude.

post #835 of 1215
I would rather be as I am than a callous internet bully. Enjoy your life alone with only the haunting glow of a computer monitor to light your cul de sac of a road.
post #836 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

 

I agree. He built a very successful writing career out of modifying his sequels since he couldn't get rights. 

 

And he's pretty much despised as a hack by anyone who likes Tolkien.  So hey, follow that trail.

post #837 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson View Post

 

And he's pretty much despised as a hack by anyone who likes Tolkien.  So hey, follow that trail.

 

Only iron Tower is despised, not the rest of the books.
post #838 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

I would rather be as I am than a callous internet bully. Enjoy your life alone with only the haunting glow of a computer monitor to light your cul de sac of a road.

 

This reads like the worst Toby Keith song ever.

post #839 of 1215

Back in the early days of the Internets, I got into an email debate/argument with McKiernan, who insisted his ripoffs were homages to Tolkien, not weak copies bordering on plagiarism. He was wholly unconvincing, and sort of an asshole, to boot.

post #840 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

 

Only iron Tower is despised, not the rest of the books.

 

Because most people with any sense stopped reading after that.  He's taking someone else's playground, slapping a shoddy coat of paint on the monkey bars, and saying, "Look what I built!"

post #841 of 1215

His Silver Call duology is even worse, in all respects, than the Iron Tower trilogy. That's where I stopped reading (more than 20 years ago).

post #842 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

I would rather be as I am than a callous internet bully. Enjoy your life alone with only the haunting glow of a computer monitor to light your cul de sac of a road.

 

This is rich irony coming from a person who spends his time cowering behind a false identity employed for the sole purpose of attracting negative attention on the internet.

 

But I do love your EXORCIST: SYNCHRONIZED synopsis. If only you could use that inspiration for something beyond trolling.

post #843 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post

 

This is rich irony coming from a person who spends his time cowering behind a false identity employed for the sole purpose of attracting negative attention on the internet.

 

But I do love your EXORCIST: SYNCHRONIZED synopsis. If only you could use that inspiration for something beyond trolling.

 

I am thrilled to know that you love my creation. The fact that it affected you speaks volumes.
post #844 of 1215

I'm sure Sebastien is jamming a crucifix into his anus as we speak.
 

post #845 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Merriweather View Post

I'm sure Sebastien is jamming a crucifix into his anus as we speak.
 

 

I wrote that scene to horrify, not inspire sexual stimulation.
post #846 of 1215
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morgan View Post

 

I wrote that scene to horrify, not inspire sexual stimulation.

 

You HAVE to have been on the internet long enough to know better than that by now.

post #847 of 1215

You guys are mean.

David Morgan is AWESOME.

Please post more EXORCIST SYNCHRONIZED. That shit JANGLED MY BALLS.

post #848 of 1215

In all honesty, one of the greatest crimes ever perpetrated was the mods deleting the SYNCHRONIZED thread. Some of the best comedy this forum has ever produced was created in there.

post #849 of 1215

Seriously. I MOURNED that thread being gone.

post #850 of 1215

I wish he got to shoot that scene from exorcist, guess that fell through.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Focused Film Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN post release discussion