or Connect
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › SKYFALL Post-Release
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

SKYFALL Post-Release - Page 20

post #951 of 1166
Thread Starter 
I agree that many would take second unit for granted and that was why I was fearful Armstrong was going to become a regular for EON. Thankfully that wasn't the case and I was happy Witt and Baird returned after the mess in QOS. Complain about the fruit carts, but I'm glad the hi tech stuff has been done away with and made the sequences more grounded and it especially helps that they have better scripts giving more context to those sequences than stupid stuff like:

*Bond punches a smoker*
"Filthy habit!"
*Machine guns everyone, and a bunch of shit blows up*
post #952 of 1166
Yeah, that exchange was wince-inducing - not least because Brosnan (like Bond!) is a fellow smoker : ) Reminds me of "The things we do for frequent flyer mileage!"

Also, I kind of see Lauren's point about the need to do something differently (although the sexual politics of the Fleming era, whilst the polar opposite of PC, do introduce a certain historical perspective into kink that's kind of interesting). But I thought "Casino Royale" was that something different - a compromised, emasculated Bond reborn as something more complicated by the end of that film. I think that film's reading of Bond is richer and more complicated than "Skyfall"s.
post #953 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Stockslivevan View Post

I agree that many would take second unit for granted and that was why I was fearful Armstrong was going to become a regular for EON. Thankfully that wasn't the case and I was happy Witt and Baird returned after the mess in QOS. Complain about the fruit carts, but I'm glad the hi tech stuff has been done away with and made the sequences more grounded and it especially helps that they have better scripts giving more context to those sequences than stupid stuff like:
*Bond punches a smoker*
"Filthy habit!"
*Machine guns everyone, and a bunch of shit blows up*

I actually think the opening of TND is one of the best in the series. "White Rook to White Knight, get the hell out of there!"

"What the hell is he doing?" "His JOB!"

In the context of the ticking clock and potential nuclear devastation, Bond's full throttle assault is heroic and bad ass.

I do wish we had Bond as a smoker though. I suggested a way to have him smoke in a future film in the Best of Bond thread.
post #954 of 1166
Thread Starter 
I do like the visual motif of Bond being observed by HQ, reflecting on the theme of mass media exploding in the 90s. I just find the action stuff a real bore.
post #955 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Harford View Post
I do wish we had Bond as a smoker though. I suggested a way to have him smoke in a future film in the Best of Bond thread.

 

With the amount of running Craig does?  Ridiculous.  You can't have both these days and have an audience take you seriously.  Physical intensity in action scenes is a Craig Bond staple now.  And I'll take the running over the smoking for an action hero.  Luckily for Bond fans, he still drinks and fucks to a level that would make Mr Hyde jealous.

post #956 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricBlair View Post

Lauren - I'm a Batman guy too!
Stocks - On Vic Armstrong, I missed that basic proficiency with shooting action with Mendes' film (A fruit cart?! Really?!). Even "Die Another Day" has competently filmed action like the opening hovercraft chase - in my opinion, "Skyfall" does not. Directing action is a skill that a lot of the mainstream guys take for granted and assume is easy. It ain't.
Not knocking anyone's opinion here, but I wanted to introduce some alternate viewpoints to what has been a remarkably (IMO) positive thread. I've been a Bond fan for thirty years, and I'm glad you guys all loved it - but for me, it was as big a disappointment as "Prometheus."

Sir, if Eva Green propositioned me, took me to her hotel suite, undressed, and turned out to have a penis, it would not be as disappointing as Prometheus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Phibes View Post

With the amount of running Craig does?  Ridiculous.  You can't have both these days and have an audience take you seriously.  Physical intensity in action scenes is a Craig Bond staple now.  And I'll take the running over the smoking for an action hero.  Luckily for Bond fans, he still drinks and fucks to a level that would make Mr Hyde jealous.

So... action heroing in a business suit and dress shoes is fine, but smoking is the deal-breaker? Okay...
post #957 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by avian View Post


Sir, if Eva Green propositioned me, took me to her hotel suite, undressed, and turned out to have a penis, it would not be as disappointing as Prometheus.

So... action heroing in a business suit and dress shoes is fine, but smoking is the deal-breaker? Okay...

 

Tailoring, sir.

 

This one's for all the Tweeting kids who fancy themselves film historians:



1000

post #958 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Phibes View Post

 

With the amount of running Craig does?  Ridiculous.  You can't have both these days and have an audience take you seriously.  Physical intensity in action scenes is a Craig Bond staple now.  And I'll take the running over the smoking for an action hero.  Luckily for Bond fans, he still drinks and fucks to a level that would make Mr Hyde jealous.

In the later Fleming novels, it's mentioned that Bond has cut back to one pack a day, down from his usual 70-90 cigarettes a day. In the Benson continuation novels, Bond is said to be down to 3-5 cigarettes a day which he smokes purely for pleasure.

 

Craig himself smokes on occasion, and Craig is the one doing all that running, so I don't think it's a stretch that his Bond could light up too.

 

I don't myself smoke at all regularly, but sometimes I will have the occasional cigarette just for the satisfaction of it, like how the night the DNC ended this summer after my long week of work, I bummed a smoke off someone and thoroughly enjoyed myself. Supposedly just living in LA is the equivalent of smoking two cigarettes a day with their smog, so smoking a handful of cigarettes a year isn't going to lead to a marked degradation of physical fitness. As far as Bond, ideally I'd like to see Craig light up in the afterglow of his latest conquest, but I think that's unlikely due to the MPAA's obsession with tobacco. Honestly I was just thrilled to see Severine smoke in Skyfall, but I won't hold my breath for Craig to do the same. However, if he were to, this was my suggestion for how it could work in the context of a future Bond film:

 

Quote:
Craig smokes “when he feels like it”, and so should Bond. How to make this fit the new Bond and a PG13 universe: Bond is undercover and we see him smoking briefly, while he observes a target. This way the producers have plausible deniability. Is Bond smoking because Bond smokes? Or because he was in disguise and trying to blend in?
post #959 of 1166

Well, without smoking, you do give up a major stand-by of the spy trade-- offering or asking someone for a light. Especially in countries where a lot of people still smoke like chimneys.

post #960 of 1166

Daniel craig is by far the best bond, I love the frantic, stoic, high wire act bond that he portrays.  As for the film, I am surpirised at how weak t is and the praise it is receiving.

 

The cold open is kind of dull until bond gets his own vehicle. I figure its meant to reinforce just how she shouldnt be a field agent but its distracting. M nannying over the whole thing makes it worse. In retrospect It would make more sense for Bond to tell M to shut it, dump Moneypenny in the back seat and finish the fight himself. the best gag in the opener was spoiled in the commercials... its too bad. that minute or two setting it up is wasted as I knew it was coming. The shooting was handled well except that she could have taken another 2 shots at least. At this point you have to question M for putting her in the field at all.

 

Adele's song is good, and the credits are fine.

 

The recovery and return are fine, I think more could have been done with his time away but thats nitpicking. I loved the testing, carving out the shrapnel, etc.

 

Whats supposed to be going on with him in the glass building? He fumbles around looking awkward and unsure just long enough to let his prey shoot a random person and nearly turn the tables on Bond.  What is up with bond at this point? Is he frustrated? Angry? Tired? Sad... The struggle hes having in fights (when in every other circumstance he would have just put them down in 2 strikes) should be making for more intense fights and some recognition of that in his face.

 

The chinese casino scene was awful. This film needed a real physical threat. Javier is a ghost and everyone else is a punching bag or fodder for komodo dragons. Moneypenny is useless, Severine deserves someone who cares and Bond doesnt feel threatened in any way.

 

The way the boat scene plays out Im starting to wonder if the writers decided dialog is too much a chore and they cant figure out how to develop their character's motivations so they just play it out in silence. Bond in one action puts severine in more danger and takes away his power to do anything about it ... for no reason. Then .25 seconds after she is dead he kills them all anyway. Bardem's speech on the island is good but he has to be the most distracted single minded villains ever... Is there a reason bond doesnt put a bullet in him when he has the chance? He should be pissed enough to do it.

 

By the way, Bardem wanting to be caught is obvious. He wanted to confront M obviously. I was annoyed the entire time he was captured because it was so obvious. The Worm/Virus hacking was poorly conceived and executed, and very very lazy. The whole idea of moving to that place and ignoring network security would be gross incompetence. The only reason were on her side in the hearing is she is M and we want to root for her and we want to see where this goes. Objectively she failed to even keep the place running right. Then again she is up against Bardem's supernatural ability to predict the future, know everything, and remote mind control secret agents.  So lets summarize the evil plan. Bardem wants to terrorize and kill M. To do this he steals the operatives list so Bond will find the thief (after being shot and nearly dying) and goes to the casino, beats his wife so she will lead Bond to him (who he kills not to punish her, but to piss off Bond). Then he need Bond to kill 5 armed guards (but not him)  despite being unarmed, and hope they take him to the new secret prison. All to confront M.  Then he breaks out by predicting all the electronic security and disabling it for the second time in the film. He is able to predict where Bond will be standing and when (to throw a subway train at him) and the moment he will exit the manhole (to be picked up by a henchman). Best of all, even though the hearings werent announced when the plan started, his plan is designed to gain freedom in time for and access to that hearing with the intent of assassinating M. (The Joker in TDK is impressed, Danny Ocean is jealous) Suddenly though, he is fallible and doesnt bring enough men or firepower to the table. At the same time Bond, who couldnt his the broad side of a barn minutes before is now pegging head shots and centering on fire extinguishers at 50 ft.

 

Suddenly Q has his number, Bond is wise to the game and M understands the threat, so off we go to Bonds house where we will hold off a siege MI6 and Parliament couldnt. Ok, and I love the idea. But Alfred's sudden appearance I think ruins what should just be Bond, M and the horde.  And everything that made Bardem a (supernatural) threat in the first two acts, is gone by the Third act header.  The idea of hime being a passable 00 is absurd as he poses no physical threat to anyone in the film except his battered wife. By the way I love that Bond ditches the official M car because its trackable, only to have Q make the same trail. to the same place.

 

Bardem, Craig and Dench as actors are all this film really had going for it. Thats a lot really. Fine movies have been made with less. But the plot, and dialog were bad. The action was passable but not superior, and the overall directing was weak.

 

Where was Jeffrey Wright?

post #961 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by kartaron View Post

 

Where was Jeffrey Wright?

Leiter is not Bond's sidekick. He doesn't have to turn up in every film. He's an ally who Bond from time to time relies upon.

post #962 of 1166
Quote:

Originally Posted by kartaron View Post

 

By the way I love that Bond ditches the official M car because its trackable, only to have Q make the same trail. to the same place.

 

It's logical to have Q make a trail that lags to buy Bond and M time. 

post #963 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnotaur3 View Post

It's logical to have Q make a trail that lags to buy Bond and M time. 

 

Yeah, its also a great excuse to pull out the old bond gadget car. The payoff is worth the thumb twiddling.

post #964 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Harford View Post

Leiter is not Bond's sidekick. He doesn't have to turn up in every film. He's an ally who Bond from time to time relies upon.

 

I like the character and actor.. and I missed him being there.

post #965 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by kartaron View Post

 

I like the character and actor.. and I missed him being there.


I like him too, but I like that he doesn't have to be there for every movie even more.

post #966 of 1166

We need..... FELIX LEITER: THE MOVIE!

 

You could have a cameo by Craig's Bond who turns up and tell him "Move your arse, Leiter!"

post #967 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSaxon View Post

We need..... FELIX LEITER: THE MOVIE!

You could have a cameo by Craig's Bond who turns up and tell him "Move your arse, Leiter!"

Only if the villain is a vindictive Gregg Beam.

post #968 of 1166

Pretty sure this hasn't been posted here yet-- Empire's long-form interview with Purvis and Wade on SKYFALL:

 

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=35726

 

Some interesting writers'-intent (not that that counts for much) tidbits about literary influences-- from both Fleming and others, the death and replacement of M, whether Kincaid was written with Connery in mind, and what's up with the Goldfinger DB5, among other things.

 

They also take pains to (diplomatically) disavow QOS and certain elements of DAD, which amused me some.

 

One thing that surprised me: Wade came up with "Skyfall" as the name of the Bond family homestead first, and the movie title came out of that. I'd been assuming it was the reverse.

post #969 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim View Post

Pretty sure this hasn't been posted here yet-- Empire's long-form interview with Purvis and Wade on SKYFALL:

 

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=35726

 

They also take pains to (diplomatically) disavow QOS and certain elements of DAD, which amused me some.

 

 

That part of the interview interested me a great deal.  They say they handed in a finished and ready script for QoS, the studio turned it over to Haggis, he tossed out much of their script, but never got to finish the draft constructed from P&W bits.  

 

I would love to get my hands on the Purvis & Wade draft.  Any chance in Hell of that happening?

post #970 of 1166
Thread Starter 
It will hit the internet someday, maybe in a couple of years. I have the original draft of GoldenEye by Michael France written when Dalton was still on board and in a lot of ways I prefer that one over the final version. Really fascinating what was kept and what changed.

Definitely would like to see the original draft for Bond 22. I'm especially interested in what Die Another Day was supposed to be like before Tamahori stepped in and started asking for crazy shit like invisible cars and giant laser beams. Purvis & Wade were great when it came to constructing ideas for films and it's too bad they often get a bad rap for decisions others made, and that everyone praises Haggis assuming all the good stuff was his (I know the pop psychology dialogue is definitely his "You're not going to let me in there, you've got your armor back on" "I have no armor left").
post #971 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Phibes View Post 

 

I would love to get my hands on the Purvis & Wade draft.  Any chance in Hell of that happening?

 

Not much of one, would be my guess. I'd love to see it myself.

 

This is something that boggles me about the film trade, though-- on the one hand, we're told (by Daniel Craig, not least of all) that QOS was a mess partly due to the writers' strike-- and on the other that there may have been a completed script that they possibly could have shot, before it ever reached Paul Haggis for rewrites.

 

Were they obligated to use Haggis's writing contributions, once he was contracted? And how much of the final result was the input of the director, Forster? We'll likely never know.

 

Another thing I found interesting in that interview was that the studio had an archivist collect all the drafts for CASINO ROYALE-- and that there were over a hundred of them. It seems incredible, but I don't doubt it for a second.

post #972 of 1166
Thread Starter 
It was ultimately Forster that rejected the Purvis & Wade draft and wanted to have the studio get Haggis.
post #973 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricBlair View Post

Glad that it worked for most people, but I'm in the minority here - I thought this was a shocking betrayal of the Bond character. Most everything has been covered elsewhere, but:
The digger on the train at the beginning. Knew trouble was brewing when there was obvious webbing/padding on the digger arm to aid the stunt man's progress. Uh, so he'll be climbing along the arm yeah?
 

 

 

I was a little disappointed by it. Seemed like a Daniel Craig version of a film in the Brosnan run....if that makes any sense. The first 2 Craig films were doing different things, and QOS kind of botched it, and then we have this one that is like a reboot within a reboot.

post #974 of 1166

I finally saw a movie you guys! In a theater and everything!

 

Skyfall was gorgeous. Definitely the best looking bond. Probably my favorite of the Craig bond movies.

 

However two things bugged, One, the callous and mercurial regard for life has been covered.

 

Second, and this is probably just me, I HATED Judy Dench's M in this one, and was waiting the entire movie for her to get killed. Happened too late for me. The character was wrong at every turn, was directly responsible for dozens (hundreds?) of deaths, a and was a sanctimonious git the whole movie. Its like she was playing Dick Cheney, with less range.  On that point, maybe Dench's health prevented her from emoting?  Her range was pretty poor:one expression, no waiting.

 

None of this would have been a problem if she hadn't been the fulcrum of the movie.

 

Otherwise, really liked it.

 

Oh and did the caretaker's line about Bond going into the tunnel a boy, and coming out a man, mean he discovered how to masturbate? I think that's the only way to interpret that line.

post #975 of 1166

I'm going to keep this brief. It's not a bad movie at all, but it's liberal use of certain themes and hell, even plot points from The Dark Knight were really distracting to me. Also, the entire time I was watching the film, and appreciating the beauty of it, the character work, and so on, there's a side of me that kept wondering: Do I really need to see Bond analyzed? His position in the world questioned?

 

I had this thought long before seeing Skyfall, just about long surviving pop culture characters like Bond, Batman, and so on, and why they keep carrying on. There's this school of thought that a lot of the characters created in times of strife are the ones that really capture the public imagination and are adaptable enough that they can move through changing fashions and so on. They survive. Bond is post-war Britain / Cold War, Batman is post-depression / WW2, etc. I thought of Bond, as people started claiming that Bourne was this new threat and that Bond was antiquated, that as long as the world is what it is, as long as there are governments, and threats, and secrets, 007 will fucking always have a job. So I suppose Skyfall is, to a certain degree, an answer to the "is Bond antiquated?" question, and what I've still not settled on is my own question: did I really need to sit through a whole movie about that?   

post #976 of 1166
I don't know, you just made a whole post about it, seems like a sort of interesting topic. I'm not saying every Bond film needs to be about stuff like this, but when the franchise is 50 years and nearly two dozen films old it's probably good if from time to time one of those films is about more than guns, girls, cars, and explosions.

But SKYFALL also has all those things.
post #977 of 1166

That's the very thing: It wasn't that interesting to me. Do I think Bond needs more than guns, girls, cars, and explosions? (don't insult me, by the way) Yes. I do. Do I feel Skyfall's delivery of the other is entirely satisfactory? No. I don't. As I mentioned, I don't even think it's a bad film, and I really enjoyed a good bit of it, but my strongest memory of the film is the British Bulldog thing. I guess I was kind of glad that I paid enough attention in history class to understand the Churchill connection, and I often times wished that the rest of the film was as playfully subtle.

post #978 of 1166

Well, last Summer there were riots all over the UK, and then this year they had a successful Olympics, so I think some soul searching about the UK's place in the world, and the character of the Brits who made/make it great, are well in order, and great themes for a Bond film. And this film had a lot of action. Not as much as Moonraker, I grant you. But you can watch the DVD of Moonraker (and I love that film by the way).

post #979 of 1166

I just saw this tonight- a friend of mine who is a huge Bond fan was in the hospital recently and I was waiting for her to get out so we could go see it together. She liked it, but I found it quite the slog. To me there was never a sense of building tension. Like, for example, the fact that Silva has a disk with the identities of a kajillion NATO agents- after he releases a few names on youtube, it's never touched on again. Does MI6 ever retrieve the information? Do they get it back when they get Silva? I'm honestly asking because it seems to me that the movie jumps tracks from that plotline to making it all about M.

 

(And plus, 'the bad guy has a list of all our agents and their code names'? They used that same MacGuffin in the first Mission Impossible movie and a dozen other spy flicks. Who keeps compiling these damn lists and why do they keep falling into the bad guys hands?)

 

Sorry if this has already been brought up and run into the ground back on page 13, I just don't have strong enough feelings about this movie to read through a 20 page thread on it.

post #980 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumeragi View Post

I just saw this tonight- a friend of mine who is a huge Bond fan was in the hospital recently and I was waiting for her to get out so we could go see it together. She liked it, but I found it quite the slog. To me there was never a sense of building tension. Like, for example, the fact that Silva has a disk with the identities of a kajillion NATO agents- after he releases a few names on youtube, it's never touched on again. Does MI6 ever retrieve the information? Do they get it back when they get Silva? I'm honestly asking because it seems to me that the movie jumps tracks from that plotline to making it all about M.

 

(And plus, 'the bad guy has a list of all our agents and their code names'? They used that same MacGuffin in the first Mission Impossible movie and a dozen other spy flicks. Who keeps compiling these damn lists and why do they keep falling into the bad guys hands?)

 

Sorry if this has already been brought up and run into the ground back on page 13, I just don't have strong enough feelings about this movie to read through a 20 page thread on it.

 

 

And most importantly, why don't they just yank all their agents out of the field once they know they've been compromised? It (barely) works in Skyfall because M is too stubborn to do it: she'd rather gamble on Bond being able to retrieve the info and eliminate the Bad Guy. And the Bad Guy knows M enough to make that character flaw part of his plan.

post #981 of 1166
Thread Starter 
Skyfall has never been about retrieving the disk drive, that was only a part of the film and was pretty much finished by the time Bond captured Silva.
post #982 of 1166

I like how the finale of Sherlock dealt with a similar plot point SPOILER

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)

Moriarty brags that he has a software program that can hack into any system anywhere. When Sherlock demands it at their final confrontation Moriarty laughs his ass off and says he made it up; he faked previous "demonstrations" and there never was such a software program, plus Sherlock and MI6 are morons for falling for such a pile of Bullshit

 

SPOILER.

post #983 of 1166
Finally saw this. Liked it. And what a well lit movie. The Shanghai bit was stunning.

And yay for Glencoe and Glen Etive. Some seriously beautiful scenery up that way, and great to see it so beautifully shot.
post #984 of 1166

Everything but Shanghai and Macau is fading from memory really fast.  I do remember how much I enjoyed non shakeycam action.

post #985 of 1166

I can't imagine how any of this movie could fade from memory.  Each section is so distinct and pretty.

post #986 of 1166

Thanks to CHUD Super=Poster LaurenOrtega for turning me on this Blogger, who has some choice words about SkyFall:

 

http://requireshate.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/skyfall-in-which-british-jingoism-makes-laughingstock-of-itself/#more-4267

post #987 of 1166

Hhahahaha I love how angry as fuck she is.

 

Love her.

post #988 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post

Thanks to CHUD Super=Poster LaurenOrtega for turning me on this Blogger, who has some choice words about SkyFall:

 

http://requireshate.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/skyfall-in-which-british-jingoism-makes-laughingstock-of-itself/#more-4267

 

*Chuckles* I initially thought this was a serious review and then realised the reviewer must be making mistakes on purpose and that it was a schtick. Still, I love the fact that she accuses the movie of being racist whilst having a black Moneypenny. *Chuckles again*

post #989 of 1166

She's overdoing the venom for giggles but she hates the movie. She's also a Thai/Chinese lesbian so chances are she's really going to see the movies(and Bond) in general as some backwards symbol of first-world colonialism.

 

 

Which is why I LOVE her!

post #990 of 1166

I want the next Bond villain to be a Thai/Chinese lesbian!

post #991 of 1166

I want the next Batman to be a Thai/Chinese lesbian.  

 

It would be nice if my motivations were even 1% genuinely progressive in nature, but, well...

post #992 of 1166

Perhaps, in 2013, Thai/Chinese lesbians will be the 2005 Jude Law. They'll be in every movie everywhere.

post #993 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSaxon View Post

 

*Chuckles* I initially thought this was a serious review and then realised the reviewer must be making mistakes on purpose and that it was a schtick. Still, I love the fact that she accuses the movie of being racist whilst having a black Moneypenny. *Chuckles again*

 

 

Haha well to be fair, she argues that MoneyPenny is incompetent in the filed and is in effect relegated to  being Bond's servant, because she's Black!

 

I actually think she's right about the racism and anti-woman stance of the film, esp how incompetent M is.

post #994 of 1166
Moneypenny works for M. Bond has his own secretary. It gets me mad when people go off about Bond tropes without knowing the first thing about the series.
post #995 of 1166

Take it easy, Harford.

 

And the point remains: Moneypenny is a servant to the White Man after proving to be incompetent in the field.

 

Haha if you liked that SkyFall review you'll loooove her reviews of Avatar and Snow White and the Huntsman:

 

A sample:

 

By rage, I mean “I’ll hunt James Cameron down and burn his house and choke his pet dogs/cats/goldfish to death and then burn them too.” That kind of rage. And you can bitch about me having ~*liberal hang-upgs*~ and agendas or “reading too much into this, it’s just FANTASY and ESCAPIST ENTERTAINMENT” if you like, but keep in mind that I’ll call you names and you will deserve every single one.

 

https://requireshate.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/avatar-oh-james-cameron-no/

 

Isn’t it remarkable by the way that every dress in this movie bares and emphasizes a woman’s cleavage? Little wonder that the only kiss initiated by Bella Swan in this film–her one moment of sexual desire–is directed at another woman. All the other kisses are initiated by men who decide it’s awesome to molest her while she’s either comatose or dead, and therefore can’t consent.

 

http://requireshate.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/snow-white-and-the-internalized-misogyny-or-how-ravennas-the-one-you-should-be-rooting-for/

post #996 of 1166

God she's so great.

 

 

The funny thing is that I don't really agree with her(which usually is the case) on Skyfall for the most part* but I actually love her basically just saying "Fuck it this movie! I'm not interested in first world white men and here are the reasons why."

 

Basically she's me when I get really pissed off and go hardcore feminist on people.

 

 

 

*Aside from Severine. I know the logic for her fate in the story, but after sitting on this I'm just willing to admit that I fucking hate sacrificial Bond girls and any writer who does it in the future should be hit with a rolled up newspaper by me.

post #997 of 1166
Thread Starter 
Man, I hope for her own sake she doesn't read a Fleming novel. Her head would literally nuke.
post #998 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cylon Baby View Post

Take it easy, Harford.

 

And the point remains: Moneypenny is a servant to the White Man after proving to be incompetent in the field.

 

Long before Bond had black women perform poorly in the field it filled those roles with White Men, and she's hardly a "servant", she's in a position of remarkable importance and power.

 

I just get really worked up about this stuff, sorry!

post #999 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Harford View Post

Long before Bond had black women perform poorly in the field it filled those roles with White Men, and she's hardly a "servant", she's in a position of remarkable importance and power.

 

I just get really worked up about this stuff, sorry!

 

 

But we're talking about a James Bond movie, not real history. Stay on point!

post #1000 of 1166
There's also the fact that Moneypenny didn't perform poorly in the field at all in Skyfall.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Focused Film Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Focused Film Discussion › SKYFALL Post-Release