Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sebastian OB 
I feel like the people favoring BLADE 1 in this discussion haven't seen BLADE 1 in a while. Yes, the opening scene is great, but it gets progressively worse with every passing scene. Say what you will about BLADE 2, dodgy CG, Spud, etc, but it keeps things at a fun even keel right through to the end at least.
I'd agree the B2 is more "fun" than the first film; GDT is having a fucking blast directing the film and it shows. However, I think that aside from really dodgy CGI for the bloodgod, BLADE holds up extraordinarily well. I prefer it over the second film, though I love both. Until Nolan came along, BLADE was essentially the Batman film I'd been wanting all along.
I think Norrington gets shitloads of miles out of a combination of great camera work, Snipes menacing presence, and a fantastic score. It's lot more of a tone poem than BLADE II.
I'd rather not pick, because I genuinely think both are good-to-great. But if forced, I'd likely go with the first film.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sebastian OB 
Now HELLBOY 1 however, is vastly superior to the overrated HELLBOY 2.
Preach! I remain convinced that HB2 rides a love of the increased number of practical effects. The first film is tighter and more to my liking (though I love that Nuada is the closest thing I'll likely ever see to having Tad Williams' Norns onscreen).