Quote:
chucky's girl:
I've seen it yesterday (in an uncut version!), and I just wanted to say how sick and brilliant it was!!!
.... Man, that movie is gross! |
Geeez girl,
you didn't see CABIN FEVER then, I guess. Oh well, the director's cute ... what a statement!

I've seen the film in a London market screening way back in October ... and I can understand David pulling back his name from it (yeah right, he wanted to leave all the fame to Eli R. ..

...). Never seen such an utter pile of dog shit in a long time. And most of the other people I was with were bored to tears.
First of all: Let's see if you can name more than ... well, let's say three Gore FX ... and no, I am not talking about shooting at some guy's head and, three seconds later, panning to the result of the shot. And no, I am not talking about the blonde girl's (forgot her name) skinless face in the shed ... that was more than ridiculous. Again, for everybody: NO, THIS MOVIE IS NOT GORY AS HELL. What did you smoke to compare this thing to Ho1KC which has some flaws obviously, but delivers a helluva lot more on the sickness scale. But well, just name me some scenes ...

Story? What story? Ouch ... Being a totally predictable rip-off of THE CRAZIES meets I DRINK YOUR BLOOD set in the woods does NOT mean story. Having characters jumping in during a scene (I am talking about the campfire sequence), let them wander off into the woods again a few secs later and have them turning up dead in the end does NOT mean story. The "gun for niggers" joke getting twisted in the very end does NOT mean story. Havin the movie end about SIX FRIGGIN' TIMES because they forgot to tie up all the loose ends does NOT mean story. Ripping off the finale of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (the remaining guy in the hut) and countless other unhappy endings does NOT mean story.
Hey, and characters: Gee, we've got four teens (well, they look way older, as usual). They're on vacation in the woods - what a blast! The first couple just drops off their stuff on arriving in the hut, and they go: Hey, let's have sex! Not sure if this was s'posed to be an hommage, but it surely misfired. The prank guy (yeah, also as usual) is such an ass it's not even funny - gee, shooting around in the woods can be fun, huh? And the only likeable one of the bunch (the blonde girl) gets the disease first and slowly falls apart over the rest of the film - what the hell is wrong with you, Eli Roth? Yes, the movie is THAT original.
What really scares me the most: I've been talking to some typical American moviegoers about the film later that year on the film markets, and some of the girls were like: Uuuh, this movie's sooo scary ... NO, GIRLS, IT'S NOT. This is the first film ever that made me feel like screaming a warning to EVERYONE who's going to see this: DON'T! It makes me desperate to probably see the film succeed at the box office while others are just dumped. But I guess that's exactly what's gonna happen ...

Sorry if my English sounds a bit stilted, or if I mixed up the grammar and stuff, or if I misspelled anything. I am German, you know, and we are allowed to be wrong sometimes ... even in language ... wink
Best regards,
the Gorelord (professional in disguise)