CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › DVD General Discussion › Technically challenged
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Technically challenged

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
I love DVD!
What does it all mean?
Anamorphic transfer ... 1.85:1
Dual layer
Region 1 DVD encoding

...and this note in fine print on my copy of TWINE: "Free Denise Richards with every purchase." ?
post #2 of 7
post #3 of 7
Thread Starter 
Thanks, Johnny! Now, how do I get the damned jewel case open, and then how do I get the disc out without cracking it right down the damned middle. And where do I put the disc? Any suggestions on where I should put the disc? Anyone? WHERE SHOULD I PUT THE DISC?
post #4 of 7
I tried to put it in my 8-track player once, but that was unsuccesful, so I would definetly avoid that. Other then that, you're on your own.
post #5 of 7
Blofeld, the answers to those questions can be found all over, but expect simple explanations (in English) on DVD Sewer when it launches soon! But I'll answer these for you now:

"What does it all mean?"

Anamorphic transfer

When a DVD is transfered as "anamorphic", it means that it has been enhanced for 16 x 9 televisions. What happens is that normal (non-anamorphic) DVDs lose resolution on HD TV and 16 x 9 widescreen TVs because the image has to be "zoomed" to fit. So, new technology was created to give the image more resolution (33.45%, actually) so that when it becomes "stretched" to fit 16 x 9... no image clarity is lost and you will not get a pixelated or "digitized" look. Basically, if you have a standard 4:3 television anamorphic is not as big a deal... but it does look better with more definition.

1.85:1

This is an OAR (original aspect ratio). Most films are shot in this ratio. What it means is that for every inch the image is high... it is 1.85 inches wide. This is known as the Academy standard or "flat" format. It will leave letterboxed bars on your TV, but not as big as... 2.35:1, which is in "cinemascope" or "scope". These are images that have, you guessed it, 2.35 inches in width to every 1 inch in height. For a comparison, look at the OAR if "Saving Private Ryan" (1.85:1) to that of something like "Titanic" (2.35:1). You will notice that the latter's image is much wider on your TV. That is, unless... you have a 16 x 9 TV, which is optimized for 1.85:1 images. Then there would be no letterbox, and only small bars for 2.35:1 transfers. Another comparison: The original "Alien" is 2.35:1. "Aliens" was shot 1.85:1. Some films have 1.66:1 transfers, but there difference is very minimal.

Dual layer
RSDL (Reverse Spiral Dual Layer) DVDs contain about 121% more information than standard due to a process that actually layers the information onto the disc in seperate regions atop one another. When watching some DVDs, you may notice a very slight pause around the 2-hour mark. This is when your player is switching layers on the same side of the disc. These discs are easily identifiable because they have a gold shine to them (rather than the standard silver).

Region 1 DVD encoding
Basically, North American studios and copyright owners were concerned with more liberal countries making bootleg DVDs. So, a format was created that makes "regional" DVDs only work in players from that region. Basically, all that means is that DVDs from different regions have seperate algorithm codes that players from that region can read and decipher, allowing access to the disc content. For instance, you cannot watch a Region 2 (UK) DVD unless you have a Region 2 player (or software decodere). This is, of course, a moot point if you have a multi-region (or bootlegged) player.

Hope this helps!



------------------
"I am not afraid."

Carl's C.H.U.D. BIO Page
----------------
Carl's DVD List (Always "in production")

post #6 of 7
Thread Starter 
Thank you!

So, Rosie O'Donnell has an OAR of 5.82:1 ?
And, when I'm thinking about CHUD island, I have an OAR of 9.35:1 and am definitely contemplating dual layering?

Am I understanding this correctly?

(snide comments aside, I do appreciate the info... TECH HEADS!)

[This message has been edited by Blofeld (edited 02-14-2000).]

[This message has been edited by Blofeld (edited 02-14-2000).]
post #7 of 7
Yes, Blofeld... you'll definitely want to dual-layer the fats
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD General Discussion
CHUD.com Community › Forums › DVD, HOME THEATER, & GADGETS › DVD General Discussion › Technically challenged