CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › The Beatles' Let It Be... Naked
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Beatles' Let It Be... Naked

post #1 of 14
Thread Starter 
Dunno if this is common knowledge or not...

From The Beatles' official site:

Quote:
AT LAST AS NATURE INTENDED

THE BEATLES' LET IT BE...NAKED

At last revealed - The Beatles album that has taken more than 30 years to finish, Let It Be...Naked, just the bare sound of the band inside The Beatles.

Let It Be...Naked is the no frills, back-to-basics album that The Beatles first set out to make back in 1969 - but which was never released as they intended, the band back to the bone.

Now, through the smart digital technology of Abbey Road studios, the never-heard band's take of the original sessions will be finally released worldwide by EMI Records in November.

Naked is Let It Be brought right up to now for the '1 Generation', de-mixed and re-mixed, un-dubbed of orchestration, choirs and effects and stripped-back to the raw to reveal The Beatles simply as what they were very best at being - just a great band.

"If we'd have had today's technology back then, it would sound like this because this is the noise we made in the studio", said Paul McCartney "It's all exactly as it was in the room. You're right there now".

"When I first heard it, it was really uplifting. It took you back again to the times when we were this band, the Beatle band", said Ringo Starr.

When The Beatles first set out to make the album in 1969, they intended to record an album that would be a return to live performance of just the bare necessities of the band, no studio effects or overdubbing of voices or instruments would be allowed. However, caught in the turmoil of the break-up of the band, the album was re-produced by Phil Spector and never released as The Beatles had originally meant it to sound. Until now.

Let It Be...Naked's track listing differs from the 1970 release; background dialogue, 'Dig It' and 'Maggie Mae' have been taken off the album and 'Don't Let Me Down' has been added to the running order, which now is as follows: Get Back, Dig A Pony, For You Blue, The Long
And Winding Road, Two Of Us, I've Got A Feeling, One After 909, Don't Let Me Down, I Me Mine, Across The Universe, Let It Be.

Let It Be...Naked will be issued together with a bonus fly-on-the-wall disc that features extracts from tapes of The Beatles at the time of first making the Let It Be album and movie in the Sixties.

The 20-minute bonus disc is a unique insight into The Beatles at work in rehearsal and in the studios in January 1969.

Let It Be...Naked will also come with a booklet that features historic photography of the recording sessions and extracts of band dialogue from the original booklet that first accompanied early copies of the 1970 album.

Released worldwide from November 17th, Let It Be...Naked is the sound of The Beatles as nature intended; raw and rocking.

"The music always surpassed any bullshit we were going through; once the count-in happened we turned back into those brothers and musicians."
RINGO STARR

"It's just us playing, in our best voices, it's very honest".
GEORGE HARRISON

"For all our success The Beatles were always a great little band. When we sat down to play, we played good".
PAUL McCARTNEY

"In spite of all things, The Beatles could really play music together"
JOHN LENNON
What do Beatles fans think of this? As someone who has recently embraced The Beatles in a big way, I'm excited. I've never liked the washy string section on "The Long And Winding Road", and have always thought it would have been sublime if it was more bare, like "Let It Be".

Just as long as there aren't any Junkie XL-type remixes...
post #2 of 14
*is filled with anticipation
I can't wait. I really love those last songs they recorded, and to hear them all together and completly bare bones would be great.
post #3 of 14
The stripped down 'Long & Winding Road' is out on the Anthology 3 Cd, and it is far superior.
post #4 of 14
"I've got a feeling" this is going to be the swass. And I should know, I'm Billy Preston. Seriously.
post #5 of 14
Quote:
Nick Luskmonster:
"I've got a feeling" this is going to be the swass. And I should know, I'm Billy Preston. Seriously.
I don't believe you...

Sounds great, I'll probably just listen to both versions back to back whenever I have a chronological Beatles marathon. I'm looking forward to hearing yet another version of "Let It Be." I'd also really enjoy hearing "Across the Universe" in particular, without the string accompaniment. It's a good thing that they completely changed the listing, this way the two ommissions won't seem so jarring to me.

I will admit that I'm going to be the only person to miss: "That was can you dig it by Georgie Wood and now we'd like to do 'Hark the Angels Come'" Which reminds me: Will this one have all the little bits of dialogue before the songs? "The picker!"-"The picks are your fingers..."
post #6 of 14
I'd better grab the origonal version, because once this new one hits I won't be able to find it.

**edited for clarity**

post #7 of 14
Paul's solo work now is worse than Avril Lavigne's, however.
post #8 of 14
Quote:
Originally posted by Kevin Matchstick
Paul's solo work now is worse than Avril Lavigne's, however.
This post should disqualify you from posting about music ever again. Nothing is worse than Avril Lavigne. Even Ringo Starr's entire solo musical output is genius in comparison to the idiot's whose high water mark was a song called "Sk8r Boi".
post #9 of 14
Have you heard the song "Freedom" by McCartney? Give me "Sk8r Boi" over that piece of shite any day of the week.
post #10 of 14
'Freedom' is ass.

But the 'Driving Rain' album is surprisingly pretty good. I just don't think McCartney will ever get his dues as a solo artist. 'Band On The Run' is as good an album as anything John recorded. Just because the man made the awful 'Imagine' it doesn't mean he was a god. He had far better songs he deserves to be remembered for, not that manipulative piece of schmaltz.

As for this version of 'Let It Be'. Oh it is far better than the original. The only problem is that because it was so overproduced this version sounds like a bunch of demo's. But once you get over that it's fantastic.

My minor quibble. Get Back ends too soon.
post #11 of 14
"Freedom" is downright embarrassing.
post #12 of 14
Indeed it is. Well intentioned but still embarrasing none-the-less.

Did you guys ever get 'The Frog Chorus' by McCartney? Now that's truely something to behold.

Oh and George is the only one who made a true masterpiece of an album out of their solo works.
post #13 of 14
Freedom is indeed an embarrassing piece of shit, but it still can't touch "Sk8r Boi" for sheer idiocy and lack of talent.

Lennon's "Plastic Ono Band" is every bit the masterpiece that George's ATMP is.

McCartney has approached masterpiece status with a couple of his albums, but he always has some insipidly annoying element that holds him back from actually crossing that line. It's a shame, because really, he was the most musically talented of all four fabs. And I say that as a fan who loves all four of them and their contributions. If only he weren't so...cheesy...
post #14 of 14
Quote:
Originally posted by Wintermute
Lennon's "Plastic Ono Band" is every bit the masterpiece that George's ATMP is.
Agreed. Maybe too screamy for some tastes, but it's the rawest, most rock'n'roll album made by any of the Beatles, INCLUDING anything made by the Beatles (of course, most of the time, they weren't going for "raw").

Quote:
McCartney has approached masterpiece status with a couple of his albums, but he always has some insipidly annoying element that holds him back from actually crossing that line. It's a shame, because really, he was the most musically talented of all four fabs. And I say that as a fan who loves all four of them and their contributions. If only he weren't so...cheesy...
It's true. Lennon's got the soul, anger, and guitar chops (see Plastic Ono Band), and Harrison managed to surprise in a big way every once in a while, but McCartney's melodies just kill. A lot of the great Beatles ballads come from him.

Listen to the late 80s collaborations he did with Elvis Costello. There you've got the benefit of a great lyricist (something Paul is often not, at least not without the competition of John and George to push him) to help out with those pretty chord changes.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
CHUD.com Community › Forums › MUSIC › Music › The Beatles' Let It Be... Naked