CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Books and Magazines › Current reading
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Current reading - Page 49

post #2401 of 4874
Based on a card on the shelf at Powell's saying that Neil Gaiman recommends it, I've started The Book of the New Sun tetralogy by Gene Wolfe. First book: The Shadow of the Torturer.
post #2402 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by RathBandu View Post
Really liked the Chris Farley Show. His AA speech that opens it kills me.

I've read a couple of books in the oral history style (the SNL book, the Farley bios, and the Warren Zevon bio's great, too), and I want to read the one about George Plimpton that came out last year. It doesn't work for everything, but it's an approach that I really enjoy when it's done right and has a good editor to put it all together.
The Hunter Thompson book GONZO is also done in this style. Great insight on the guy.

As for myself I am reading The Last Campaign. Amazing to think all this stuff was going on an almost daily basis. Along with the paraells I notice between what went on with Obama's campaign and then co-opting of the poverty track by Edwards four years ago.

That and RFK had ten kids. TEN KIDS! Poor Ethyl.
post #2403 of 4874
I really liked Last Campaign when I read it this past summer in the heat of the current political campaign. Very informative. That, too, reminds me that I need to read Evan Thomas's biography of RFK that I bought shortly after.
post #2404 of 4874
Confederacy of Dunces. Again. Just love it. Especially worth in a read in this climate, in which society continues to show-off its untold stupidity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
The Hunter Thompson book GONZO is also done in this style. Great insight on the guy. ...
Have you read any of Thompson's Generation of Swine?
Quite fucking brilliant, and excellent counter-reading to anything by Bret Easton Ellis.
post #2405 of 4874
Next time I'm going to pick 2666 from the library again and finish it. It's an amazing novel chewers.

I just finished McCarthy's All the pretty horses. It's beautiful. I could write more but, verbatim:

Quote:
"He thought about Alejandra and he remembered her the first time he ever saw her passing along the cienga road in the evening with the horse still wet from her riding it in the lake and he remembered the birds and the cattle standing in the grass and horses on the mesa. The sky was dark and a cold wind ran through the bajada and in the dying light a cold blue cast had turned the doe's eyes to but one thing more of things she lay among in the darkening landscape. Grass and blood. Blood and stone. Stone and the dark medallions that the first flat drops of rain caused upon them. He remembered Alejandra and the sadness he'd first seen in the slope of her shoulders which he'd presumed to understand and of which he knew nothing and he felt a loneliness he'd not known since he was a child and he felt wholly alien to the world although he loved it still. He thought that in the beauty of the world were hid a secret. He thought the world's heart beat at some terrible cost and that the world's pain and its beauty moved in a relationship of diverging equity and that in this headlong deficit the blood of multitudes might ultimately be exacted for the vision of a single flower."
post #2406 of 4874
That made me dig up the Favorite Passages thread. Good stuff.
post #2407 of 4874
Right now I'm reading The Domino Men by Jonathan Barnes. It's the semi-sequel to Barnes' debut novel The Somnambulist. To anyone that enjoys mystery novels with weird and creepy twists, I'd highly recommend both of these books.

Basically, The Somnambulist could be described as Sherlock Holmes combined with a good Neil Gaiman novel and David Lynch. It's clever as hell, and surprised me on more than one occasion. The narrative of the novel is also done in a fairly original way.

Also, it introduces a set of characters, named Hawker and Boon, which are more focused upon in The Domino Men - as they are the Domino Men. Basically the Domino Men are insane and murderous versions of Tweedledee and Tweedledum that are immortal and can travel through time.

While The Somnambulist took place in Victorian London, The Domino Men takes place in modern London, and deals with conspiracies and a secret civil war taking place in England. The common link of the novels are the Domino men.

I really can't recommend these two novels enough. While it appears Jonathan Barnes hasn't caught on too much with the general public, I would bet that he's a name that's highly regarded in fiction in a few years.
post #2408 of 4874
I just realized I've been reading Crime and Punishment over the last four months. Great novel, yes, I just need to strap it to myself or something...
post #2409 of 4874
Just picked up Terry Pratchett - Going Postal, Michael Chabon - Yiddish Policemen's Union, and Hunter S. Thompson -Hell's Angels. Not sure what I'm going to read first.
post #2410 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody Wanker View Post

Also, it introduces a set of characters, named Hawker and Boon, which are more focused upon in The Domino Men - as they are the Domino Men. Basically the Domino Men are insane and murderous versions of Tweedledee and Tweedledum that are immortal and can travel through time.

.
Great. I liked Somnambulist, but those guys were my least favorite characters. They reminded me of something Garth Ennis would come up with for cheap laughs.
post #2411 of 4874
Finally listening to Dune on audiobook. It's about a day and a half long but so far I can see what the fuss is about.
post #2412 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark View Post
Great. I liked Somnambulist, but those guys were my least favorite characters. They reminded me of something Garth Ennis would come up with for cheap laughs.
If you liked The Somnambulist, I wouldn't let their characters stop you from reading The Domino Men. Even though their nickname is the title of the book, they're not the main characters. This time around the main character is a filing clerk that used to be a child TV star, who's pretty much a pathetic character and is the complete opposite of Edward Moon in The Somnambulist.

Also, there's some really funny and inventive narrative twists once again. I'd still recommend it.
post #2413 of 4874
Got Zombe Haiku and it's a good bit of fun so far. Going to knock this out before moving onto my next book.
post #2414 of 4874
Finally going to start reading Little Brother by Cory Doctorow, which was given to me during the CHUD gift exchange this past Christmas. Very much looking forward to it.
post #2415 of 4874
Good stuff. You'll like it, Chris.

After reading a few short books, I'm changing it up with Of Human Bondage, which is relatively huge but really really smooth and readable.
post #2416 of 4874
Everyman's Library just came out with a new hardcover release of Michael Herr's Dispatches, so I was all over that. If you liked Apocalypse Now or Full Metal Jacket, I'd recommend this book in a heartbeat.
post #2417 of 4874
I'm reading The Shock Doctrine, and 30 pages in, I already feel the need to punch babies. This book will not make me a happy man.
post #2418 of 4874
By the time you get to Iraq and New Orleans, you'll want to punch the world.
post #2419 of 4874
They sorta talk a bit about it, but I saw I'm going also in 1990's Russia too. Glad to see I will not feel better later on.
post #2420 of 4874
I read Darkly Dreaming Dexter last night. I'm not sure if I was spoiled by the quality of the first season of the Showtime adaptation, or if the producers just had the same thought I did--this is an intriguing setup that goes completely off the rails in the last 30 pages.
post #2421 of 4874
I finished and adored Kavalier and Clay. I actually went into it very unhyped, so I didn't have inflated expectations, but I loved it. I wish it were non-fiction, it's a great story. Read Nick Mason's autobiography of his Pink Floyd days "Inside Out" after that, and now I'm re-reading Watchmen. This will be soon followed by a trip to the library.
post #2422 of 4874
I'm working on Kavalier and Clay now also because of this thread. I'm finding that I have to treat this much like I treat McCarthy, where I'm usually a person who sits down and reads 200 pages at a time there are certain authors who overload my brain if I try to do that. So I'm sitting down and reading a chapter or two at a time and then putting it down. Good so far but I'm really early in.
post #2423 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy n View Post
Just cracked the covers of DROOD by Dan Simmons.
What?!? I didn't think it was coming out for a while yet!
post #2424 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Pathetic View Post
I'm working on Kavalier and Clay now also because of this thread. I'm finding that I have to treat this much like I treat McCarthy, where I'm usually a person who sits down and reads 200 pages at a time there are certain authors who overload my brain if I try to do that. So I'm sitting down and reading a chapter or two at a time and then putting it down. Good so far but I'm really early in.
Considering all the shitty TV you watch, it's no wonder quality literature can deliver such a shock to your system.
post #2425 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Savage View Post
I'm reading The Shock Doctrine, and 30 pages in, I already feel the need to punch babies. This book will not make me a happy man.
I'm reading this too. Sometimes I think I purposely fuel my misanthropy as a masochistic quest for misery.

edit: It's amazing how cartoonishly evil the CIA is.
post #2426 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy n View Post
Oh it is out baby!!
It is big, fat, and looks awesome. But I'm not buying hardcover this year, I decided. I never get to them fast enough, and I prefer a paperback for the subway anyhow.
post #2427 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark View Post
Considering all the shitty TV you watch, it's no wonder quality literature can deliver such a shock to your system.
Actually I think it's all the shitty books I read. But considering you're basing that statement on nothing more than The Office, I'll take that for what it's worth. Not much.
post #2428 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack_rabbit View Post


Have you read any of Thompson's Generation of Swine?
Quite fucking brilliant, and excellent counter-reading to anything by Bret Easton Ellis.
I haven't and if it is counter-reading to Ellis, this means the book is actually readable.
post #2429 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdHocken View Post
I haven't and if it is counter-reading to Ellis, this means the book is actually readable.
Ouch.
post #2430 of 4874
Well, in the interest of full disclosure the only Ellis book I tried reading was Glamorama. So that may have skewed me.
post #2431 of 4874
I've ripped through quite a few books since the New Year.

Three that come to mind:

The Worst Journey in the World - by Apsley Cherry-Garrard: Haunting story of Robert Falcon Scott's 1910-1913 Terra Nova expedition to reach the South Pole, which was voted "The Greatest Adventure Story Ever Told" by National Geographic. Whilst the author gives the doomed Scott plenty of coverage, the real heart of the book is the harrowing mid-winter journey made by Wilson, Bowers (who both died with Scott 12 miles from safety) and A C-G to Cape Crozier for the eggs of the Emperor penguin. The conditions those men endured (down to -76 degrees with winds up to and including hurricane force) in friendship and bravery are simply beyond my imagination.

Quote:
"And there seemed not one chance in a million that we should ever see our tent again [it had been blown away by a hurricane]. We were 900 feet up on the mountain side, and the wind blew about as hard as a wind can blow straight out to sea. First there was a steep slope, so hard that a pick made little impression upon it, so slippery that if you started down in finnesko you never could stop: this ended in a great ice-cliff some hundreds of feet high, and then came miles of pressure ridges, crevassed and tumbled, in which you might as well look for a daisy as a tent: and after that the open sea. The chances, however, were that the tent had just been taken up into the air and dropped somewhere in this sea well on the way to New Zealand. Obviously the tent was gone.

Face to face with real death one does not think of the things that torment the bad people in the tracts, and fill the good people with bliss. I might have speculated on my chances of going to Heaven; but candidly I did not care. I could not have wept if I had tried. I had no wish to review the evils of my past. But the past did seem to have been a bit wasted. The road to Hell may be paved with good intentions: the road to Heaven is paved with lost opportunities.

I wanted those years over again. What fun I would have with them: what glorious fun! It was a pity. Well has the Persian said that when we come to die we, remembering that God is merciful, will gnaw our elbows with remorse for thinking of the things we have not done for fear of the Day of Judgment.

And I wanted peaches and syrup—badly. We had them at the hut, sweeter and more luscious than you can imagine. And we had been without sugar for a month. Yes—especially the syrup.

Thus impiously I set out to die, making up my mind that I was not going to try and keep warm, that it might not take too long, and thinking I would try and get some morphia from the medical case if it got very bad. Not a bit heroic, and entirely true! Yes! comfortable, warm reader. Men do not fear death, they fear the pain of dying."
The author's prose is at times both beautiful and evocative. I could almost reach out and touch the terrifying and desolate Antarctic landscape. Sadly for him he never fully recovered from the environment's brutalities and the loss of his friends. It was only through writing this account that he managed in some way to exorcise his demons and the guilt he endured over whether he could have done more to save his friends.

For anyone interested, The Worst Journey in the World is available for free download (the rights have now expired) at Project Gutenberg.



The Terror by Dan Simmons: Door-stopping fictionalised account of the Franklin Expedition (which perished with the loss of over 200 men in search of the "Northwest Passage" through the North Canadian wastelands) with a supernatural twist. I've read a couple of books on the Franklin Expedition (including John Geiger & Owen Beattie's steadfastly forensic "Frozen in Time", which asserts that the men were poisoned by the lead in their food tins) and I was very surprised at the amount of research Simmons had done for this. Names, dates, places all tally up perfectly and the personalities of the main characters (Franklin, Crozier and Fitzjames) are pretty much in accordance with accepted history.

Simmons paints Crozier as a heroic, complex, resourceful and fiercely resolute man passed over for promotion by the class establishment because of his Irish roots. Pitched against a supernatural foe of unrelenting savageness he battles to save lives and stop his men descending into inhumanity. I enjoyed the parts devoted to Crozier. He's brilliantly written.

Some of the other characters I was less enthused by - especially the "rat faced" Cornelius Hickey (the human villain) whose evil can be explained by expediency and little else. I'm also a bit uneasy about Simmons' decision to draw him as the only homosexual (apart from the briefly mentioned Harry Peglar, who doesn't 'practice' at sea and is coincidentally(?) honorable and good). There are a number of authors out there who appear to think that it's ok to paint villains as gay purely because it will evoke a feeling of cheap revulsion in readers who find it uncomfortable. I really do hope Simmons isn't one of them.

But my main criticism of the book is the supernatural premise: it simply isn't necessary. The story of the Franklin Expedition - which includes poisoning, scurvy, starvation and ultimately cannibalism - is horrific enough without the added baggage of a mystical super-predator hunting the men out on the ice. It exploits their suffering and depreciates their bravery in the face of inconceivable madness.



Rollback by Robert J. Sawyer: Award-winning SF tale of two aging scientists (married) who are given the opportunity of rejuvenation treatment so that they can decipher the response to a message broadcast by them sixty years earlier to an alien civilization. Unfortunately, the treatment only works for the male character and they are forced to come to terms with the massive age-gap that exists between them.

For me it's a fascinating premise tragically ruined by the limitations of the author. Sawyer can't write for shit. His prose reaches levels of clumsiness beyond even that held by Larry Niven (which is saying something). The central duo demonstrate little realism or subtlety and would probably find it difficult to remain upright before a gnat's fart.
post #2432 of 4874
Just finished Al-Qaeda by Jason Burke of The Observer (UK). A forensic analysis of the beginnings of the group, the motivations of the main Salafist players, the role of Bin Laden in Afghanistan, the relationship between al-Qaeda and the people of Afghanistan, the transformation of AQ during “The War on Terror” as well as the hopeless myths ascribed to it by Western governments:Burke is one of the new breed of Robert Fisk-inspired journalists who has no problems roughing it with the indigenous population for as long as it takes to get a story. He speaks fluent Arabic and is remarkably well informed for such a young guy.

Some of the main points:

1.In order to gain international recognition the Taliban (“a local movement with limited knowledge of the outside world, Islamic or otherwise, and profoundly parochial ambitions”) agreed to outlaw all opium production in Afghanistan (verified). Following the legislation supply dropped to a record low and the price of opium shot through the roof. The West thought it was a gimmick and ignored their request.
2.After the arrival of Bin Laden in Afghanistan the Taliban became extremely uneasy. They felt he was brining too much heat down on them from the international community. Mullah Omar had little time for OBL's internationalist Jihad movement and instructed him to stay out of Afghanistan's affairs.
3.The relationship between the Taliban and bin Laden dissolved to the point where they agreed to hand him, Ayman-al-Zawahiri, Mohammed Atef and the rest of Al-Qaeda over to America via Saudi Arabia (verified).
4.The deal fell apart when Clinton decided to distract attention away from his extra-marital affairs by launching cruise missiles into Afghanistan & Pakistan. Following these strikes the Taliban walked away from the table. They refused to hand AQ over because they would have lost face with their Pakistani paymasters.
5.Bin Laden was probably responsible for the car-bombing of former ally and the West's preferred moderate choice as president – Abdul Azzam.
6.Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi the Jordanian-born militant and (according to the West) Al-Qaeda operative responsible for a wave of brutal murders in Iraq before being killed in a US airstrike positioned himself as a rival to OBL rather than a follower.
7.The al-Qaeda hardcore (perhaps no larger than 200 individuals) has been massively degraded by the activities of Western armed forces in Afghanistan and Pakistani operations in the north of their country.

Quote:
“At the beginning of this book I outlined the various meanings of al-Qaeda. It could mean a vanguard, a base or a maxim, precept, rule or methodology. In the fifteen years since the end of the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan modern Islamic militancy has run through three phases, each of which corresponds to one of those meanings. In the first phase, from around 1989 to 1996, hundreds of activists who had been involved in the war against the Soviets or were fighting local struggles against regimes in the Middle East worked, often independently, at radicalising and mobilising those who had hitherto shunned extremism. These activists saw themselves as 'the vanguard' – 'al-Qaeda al'sulbah' – and saw their role as enlightening and then leading the masses into war and a just society. Their preferred propaganda weapon was spectacular violence. From 1996-2001 much of this 'vanguard' came together in Afghanistan, where an unprecedented terrorist infrastructure was available. Though many remained independent, a large number became associated with bin Laden, who by the autumn of 1998 had the highest profile of all the alumni of the war against the Soviets. Using that profile, and helped by historical circumstances that pushed the Taliban closer to the foreign Jihadis, bin Laden was able to create something that approximated 'a base', the second understanding of al-Qaeda that I mentioned in my first chapter. Then came 11 September and the subsequent campaign which destroyed that 'base'. The second phase came to an end. We are now in the third phase, where al-Qaeda, neither a vanguard or a base, is instead accurately characterised by the third translation I outlined: the methodology, the maxim, the precept, the rule, the way of seeing the world. You are a member of 'al-Qaeda' if you say you are”.
Burke's point is that al-Qaeda has moved from being a centralised operation training and funding terrorist activities abroad to an amorphous and thus extremely difficult (and far more dangerous) target to gather intelligence on. The new breed of al-Qaeda terrorists are often born in the country they choose to attack and may have little or no connection with the group whose ideals they wear on their chest. Which is precisely what bin Laden planned to achieve in the first place.
post #2433 of 4874
Just finished THE GRAVEYARD BOOK by Neil Gaiman. How wonderful.
post #2434 of 4874
Starting a reread of The Name of the Rose. Should be nice to take it a bit slower, now that the central mystery plot won't be driving me to race through it like I did when I read it for the first time years ago.

I'm also halfway through Susan Faludi's The Terror Dream. She's laying out her argument in a very workmanlike fashion, but I'm hoping it comes together into something greater than the sum of its parts.
post #2435 of 4874
Haruki Murakami's After Dark. Guess who's a fucking idiot for not reading this guy sooner.
post #2436 of 4874
Yep, Murakami is really good. Proceed directly to Kafka on the Shore.
post #2437 of 4874
I have Wind-Up Bird Chronicle next.
post #2438 of 4874
Hard Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World is a great read as well. How is the translation of After Dark?
post #2439 of 4874
I don't know how to tell whether a translation's good or not, but the prose is simple and elegant and the dialogue's pretty great.
post #2440 of 4874
I love Murakami, especially the short stories. The novel just feels too big for what Murakami has to say. I've only read Kafka on the Shore, but it wandered in ways that I knew were extraneous. The extraneous material does add a couple of layers to the world (art conversations, cooking, bathing nude in the sunshine) but the plot is so tight that I feel there were two priorities fighting with one another. I like plot-heavy books. I like world-heavy books. Somehow in Kafka the paranthetical sections just stood out too much.

That being said, I love Murakami, especially the short stories.
post #2441 of 4874
Hard-Boiled Wonderland/End of the World may be more up your alley. It's a lot tighter.
post #2442 of 4874
Battle for Justice which is about the Robert Bork confirmation hearings. Who knew John Bolton was such a shill even then?
post #2443 of 4874
Halfway through William Nicholson's The Society of Others, so far, so good.

After that i'll be dipping into my second Joseph Wambaugh book The Blue Knight.
post #2444 of 4874
Picked up this week:

Dune(tired of the audiobook)
Blood Meridian
Jonathan Strange and Mr Norell
World War Z
The Forever War
Neuromancer
It's Superman

Reading Dune currently but It's Superman seems interesting.
post #2445 of 4874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Logan View Post
Halfway through William Nicholson's The Society of Others, so far, so good.

After that i'll be dipping into my second Joseph Wambaugh book The Blue Knight.
What was your first? My favorite is The Choirboys
post #2446 of 4874
Yeah, that was the one i read. It was like Pelecanos meets the 87th Precinct, I really liked it.

I'm tempted by his Fire Lover. It'd make a nice change reading about a firemen instead of the usual coppers and thieves.
post #2447 of 4874
Fire Lover is a fantastic true crime book and it's pretty much Wambaugh's last true crime book. And if you liked Blue Knight check out his first book The New Centurions.
post #2448 of 4874
Just finished Gravity's Rainbow. The only thing I can say is that it was worth the effort. Now I'm on to The Worst Hard Time by Timothy Eagan, which is about the people who remained on the high plains during the Dust Bowl in the 1930s. It almost reads like a novel.
post #2449 of 4874
I'm about a third of the way through 'Money Shot' by Christa Faust. I bought this one based upon a recommendation from RathBandu in the Crime Fiction thread, and it's GREAT so far. Many thanks, Rath!
post #2450 of 4874
The Jennifer Morgue by Charles Stross. Written by a nerd, about a nerd protagonist, and for nerds, but man is it entertaining. Lovecraft meets James Bond with a dash of Chuck (the TV show, not the meat).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Books and Magazines
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Books and Magazines › Current reading