Thanks, Smirk! Welcome Ripley! I really enjoyed these new additions. Yay!
HMT, thank you for this post! I really appreciate your feedback. I would like to bow out of this thread a bit until I see more of DWC. After all, this is his thread, so...
I think that happened for me with A Father, My Dad. The whole poem is great, very moving, but the last two stanzas really took me out of the poem, and it got confusing. I still got it mostly, but the tone of the poem changes so suddenly at the last two stanzas, so it was a bit awkward for me.
Completely understandable. I don't write for the masses. My poems are highly personal. I, too, usually have a line in mind and build from that, unless it is directed at a specific source..then I will address it directly. If you knew my dad's history, the poem would have made perfect sense. You never knew the man so there is no possible way to relate to those stanzas, and I'm fine with that. If you enjoyed part of it, that's nice. If you didn't, that's fine, too. I write for myself. It is my blog, if you will. I haven't written poetry in years, which is why I provide dates. What mattered most to me at the time that I wrote it was for my dad to relate. He did. He cried as he read it and that spoke volumes to me.
I feel a repsonsibility to the truth in writing, in whatever subject it may appear. I think you do too, which is why the poem seemed to jump a bit for me, because the truth is sometimes arresting.
Heh. I can totally relate to what you're saying. I'm nodding my head here. Not all of my poetry (The Err Is Human, for example) is so deeply personal that others can't relate, but most is. I'm not looking to ever have them published, though I did enter some in a contest eons ago. There are two published writer's in my family and hopefully, soon, a third. I am not one of them, nor do I long to be. I'm just sharing for fun so critiquing is most welcome.
I think that's why it's hard for me to get real vocal when I respond to the different CHUDSTORIES. I love reading them all. I love commenting on them all, but I have a hard time critiquing because to each writer, they ARE highly personal and so a bit of each writer appears in their work. I'm looking deeper, into the mindset of the person showcasing their piece. Every story is a touch of that writer and so they are ALL good to me. So, yeah, I sound the same in every response, because I DO love them all.
In other words: Critique me, so I can learn how to critique!
However, Hall and Kenyon work that way. They build these fantastically minute details into a whole picture and then they stop showing and just tell you exactly what's happening.
Thanks for sharing that. I'll have to check them out!