Tattoos on women (yay or nay)

Tattoos are so 5 years ago. I used to dig them, especially those small of the back ones, but now, everyone has them and it's boring, so I like au naturale now. I hate when girl's ruin their stomachs with tattoos. That's always been a no-no.

Yay for me. I like tattoos and I dig em on chicks. Any size they like as long as it's quality work.

Nay for me. My one and only run in with a chick sporting her colors... I was nearing her nether-regions, pulled off her squirrel-covers, and curse Fred Berry there was a thorny rose with gothic lettering saying "Every Rose has a Thorn". I was repulsed, sickened, thwarted...for 5 seconds and then continued about my business.

I love em. You may have noticed that when I posted some pics of some Suicide Girls in that other thread. They are heavily tattooed and pierced. I love tattoos on girls ONLY if the are really colorful. If its just lettering or black - yuck.

Depends. My last girl had this tribal black dragon on her right shoulder. It was big, but way sexy. It was kinda hypnotic, in a weird sexy kinda way, like the way I used to always trace it. Very cool.

YAY!

I had a girl with one on the small of her back once, and it was THE sexiest thing I've ever seen in my life. The work was not the best quality, and it was a pretty generic tribal design, but something about it...

The Creeture only has one on her ankle, which is sexy in it's own way, but soon we will BOTH have more. Soon being when I can afford it, of course.

My girlfriend has a small one on her backside but the huge monster ones...no.

Peace.

yay for novelty, nay for longevity.

Both the women I've slept with had tattoos. My old girlfriend back in the '80's was a punk.

She had lots of "jailhouse" tattoos on her arms and legs, and a tattoo of an electric chair on her back. My wife has a smiley face on her left ankle.

I like the artistry involved in tattoos, and marvel at my ex-girlfriend for sitting through all that ink.

I'm too much of a pussy to ever get one, though. I have sensitive skin.

Nay. Especially the overblown gothic type. The cutesy ones on ankles are fine because they're easily ignored, but they're no less ugly once you do spot them.

What's so sexy about a barbed-wire rose, Chinese dragon, or teeny weeny happy face anyway?

Not a damn thing. I like me-wimmins un-scarred.

I know a chick who has flames around her nipples and it is pretty damn sexy.

My ex had an original design, small, at the small of her back. It worked for her because A) she designed it & B)it actually fit the curve rather well, but I wouldn't call it sexy.

I'm not a fan of them, but sometimes they look damn good. For instance, that style Clooney 'had' in From Dusk Til Dawn...does that have a name?

Friend of mine in college had her signature on her ankle, which somehow worked rather well.

Pretty hot.

Nay. It's just sick. I'm not a fan of strange piercings, either.

Colour me stupid, but I heard somewhere that those were George Clooney's real tatoos.

Anyway, small tatoos are really sexy, given the right placement and whatnot. These three hot chicks at work (who have a semi-lesbian thing going on I am constantly witness to ) got matching tatoos below their waists and they look tops.

Exception to the rule being Asia Argento, but her's dives below the stomach into naughty land.

I normally don't like tattoos or piercings, but I once met this dutch-chinese girl who had tiny black and bloodred dragon on the small of her back which I had dreams about for years.

And the dreams of Kristin Kreuck(sp?) continue.

My own version of HEART! has them and wants more.
While not thrilled about the idea, it's not a turnoff, either. At least she's got taste, hunts down good artists, and prefers original pieces to "number 43 off the the left wall, but in blue."

This is when tattoos ruin a perfectly good bitch. I love Rachel Perry, have for years now, but what the fuck did she do to herself? The one on the back especially. Huge.

<img src="http://www.stuffmagazine.com/girls/rachel_perry/rachel_perry_l3.jpg" alt="" />

<img src="http://www.stuffmagazine.com/girls/rachel_perry/rachel_perry_l2.jpg" alt="" />

Like uninteresting people, there are a lot of people who have uninteresting tattoos. I mean how dumb is it if you have same tattoo as Barb Wire.

I heard a John Waters interview recently where he was saying how in a couple of years tattoo removers are going to make fortunes. I agree.

Me? I regret nothing. Certain exceptions aside, you boys wouldn't know good pussy if it clawed at you. A chick with a tattoo will always swallow.

A tat should be a permanent, personal statement - a reflection of what you have inside. I don't care what a tattoo is, or how big or what color as long is it means something to the person sporting it. If a woman is a huge Roy Orbison fan and get a tattoo of Roy Orbison on her ass, then that's fucking awesome. Hell, even if she were a huge Adam Sandler fan and got a Roy Orbison tattoo on her ass as a cheeky nod to The Waterboy, then that'd be fine, too, because it's an important part of how she feels and her tattoo is a physical expression of that.

Now, if she (or anyone) had an Oakland Raiders logo tattoo but was actually a Browns fan, but liked how the Raiders logo looked, then IMO, that's stupid. A tattoo is a wonderful nonverbal signal - a billboard, if you will - a means to attract likeminded individuals. Therefore a tattoo should honestly communicate something about you. In Cap Katanga's example, the "Every Rose has a thorn" tattoo (to me) would signal: "I like late '80's power ballads, spandex pants and dirty men who smell like ashtrays." An obvious mismatch, and one that, like the Captain, as issue that could be dealt with ...later. But to someone else, that same tat could read "I enjoy the power and fury of a packed arena, the forlorn rhapsody in Axel's voice, and the raw, visceral impact of a solo performed by a guitar virtuouso like Slash." To someone, this woman could be soulmate material.

Even Coyote's example of #43 in Blue could be okay (I say that only for purposes of this post), if the image that is #43 in blue happens to hold some deep, personal significance to the person on which it will be inked. But like I think Coyote was going with that, a person who picks #43 in blue just because all her other dingbat friends are getting tattoos, that is just reprehensible.

To me, the bottom line is I'm all about personal expression, and a tattoo is one of the more powerful forms of it. Don't falsely advertise who you are.

It's cool if it's on the small of her back or something small on her ankle, but gargantuan tattoos aren't that cool. Also, while a tattoo above a woman's breast isn't necessarily ugly, I've noticed that all porn stars have one. Apparently, it's a requirement.

well it's pretty stupid for anyone to get a tongue stud. those will FUCK YOUR TEETH UP.

Where's that thread on the the tongue vibrator....

Yay!

I am a HellSpawn of many words.

That's odd... I had the exact opposite reaction to those pictures. I used to think she was just a little too cute. And now, I think she's just the right amount of cute.

So, I guess, put me down for a 'yay'.[/QB][/QUOTE]

I have to agree with Dennis here. Those tats made her look so much sexier.

I love a woman in tatoos. Of course this may be a "grass is greener" idea considering my fiance would never even think about getting one. She does love mine, though.

I have three, I like them, I think they're sexy on other people.

*curtsy*

Not sexy at all. Total white trash move. Its the 90's version of the mullet. Watch Jerry Springer, every hillbilly on there has some big stinkin tatoo and or piercings.

Worst trend since fake breasts!

I'm tired of tattoos. It seems that every girl has one nowadays, either at the base of their neck, on their ankle, or over a shoulder blade.

Blah. Don't need.

Kirb, your obvious respect and caring for the fairer sex is just... stunning.

According to the Church, evil spirits are alive and well in Metal.

My favourite bit of jewelry is the chain running from the nose to ear.
It makes a convientant handle.

What kind of church did you get this from? The Church of Crazy Bastards?

So goblin, tattoos and piercing are only exciting if someone follows your principals toward them? I understand what you are trying to say, many people get tatoos that mean nothing to them & point their fingers toward something on a page. However, there are those of us who CANNOT draw for shite. If I drew my own tattoo it would look something like Billy Madison's blue duck. Much like books can affect the reader, a drawing, or a symbol or a design can affect or speak to someone other than the one who drew it.

The Church of the Psychotic Bastard.
No, wait, that' Church of England. They're too laid back to worry about evil in the music industry.

I've always prefered Victoria.

In related news, neither UGB nor Coyote will be around next year, as UGB will be in jail for a few months for killing Coyote.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kirby Drummond:
[QB]This is when tattoos ruin a perfectly good bitch. I love Rachel Perry, have for years now, but what the fuck did she do to herself? The one on the back especially. Huge.

Shes still hot as hell. I actually like her tatoos. Im not a tatoo person and they look pretty good.

This is a very interesting and funny thread. I enjoyed reading all the comments. I agree that tats are a very personal choice and they should "reflect" a statement about yourself when choosing one.

I have virgin skin in regards to tats, but I debated one a few years back. I just keep thinking about how it will look into the future when it's on wrinkled skin and the colors have faded. Some are sexy as hell to me, while others look like someone needed to feel at home in a circus. But again, it's personal choice, so I can't say or yay or nay. It's up to the individual that dons 'em.

I work with a 40 year old grandmother that has a HUGE tazmanian devil on her wrist, of all places, and I dunno...how would she look in an evening gown?

Sidenote: Rachel Perry is a beautiful woman, but those tats need to be about 3 inches smaller, each. I'd rather my mate stared at my ass rather than a huge flower every time. LOL

I figured after the 473rd smartass reply to one of your posts, you'd be about ready to kill me, now wink

There is a difference. Hillbillys on Jerry Springer don't have the money for or access to quality work.

Man I re-read my post and didn't mean to sound like such and ass. I guess I was just mad at the world on that particular day. What I should have said was no I don't find them sexy but if other people do thats fine with me. Just don't ruin your breasts by getting them tatooed please.

I love tattoos even though I only have one. I don't like the trite stuff though, the typical flower on the ankle/small of the back/thigh and what have you. The placement is one thing, but seeing the same design (or variations) over and over in the same places just gets silly. I don't think they're ugly, but they're just redundant.

Mine is actually one of the redundant tats now too, which kills me! I got it for my 15th birthday and it's on my calf, lower to the ankle but higher because of the size. I was hanging with a somewhat hippy crowd and was really digging Henry Rollins so I got a sun (Henry looks SO good with his shirt off and all that ink). Now suns are everywhere, arg, and it's too damn bright and big to cover over, so I live with it.

My friend Kat has her entire back as canvas for a tribal bat and it's one of the most beautiful things I've seen, super sexy. And I love sleeves. When I contemplate how I'll feel about tattoos when I'm old, I just think, I'll be too busy wetting myself and wanting to chew again than to worry about my skin.

In the Philippines, there are all these little old ladies in Bontoc and the surrounding areas around Sagada and stuff with these insane tribal sleeves in black black non faded ink. They're all wrinkly but they still look super cool.

I have plans to get the Argento/Goblin bloody ballerina on my right bicep as soon as I have the cash, I want the best tattoo artist to do it and the guy I have in mind is pricey but so worth it.

Exactly. By the time my skin starts sagging and looking grisly, I think I'll be long past the "going shirtless and impressing the chicks" phase. Fuck it, I like having my tats now - I'd rather have them as reminders of when I was young and crazy as I dribble my last in some home...

Are you suggesting there's a quality mullet?

Well I always thought Michael Boltons mullet rocked!

Regarding Rachel Perry, if we were to sex doggystyle-like, I'd feel like I was whacking off into a rose bush.

That said, tattoos are fine, all I ask is that you leave the breasts alone.