Quote:
Guttenberg Fan Club:
Don't you think hiring teens & immigrants for minimum wage (because they can't get a job anywhere else) is exploitive? They can afford to pay more, instead they take advantage of people who need to look to McDonalds (for instance) for job training (as horrible as that is). |
I think it depends entirely on the circumstances. Like I said, I knew plenty of kids in high school who took on jobs at McDonald's and the like and had no problem with them, whatsoever.
Some teenagers don't necessarily NEED more than the low pay they're given. It's not a matter of survival, and starter jobs just start with low pay.
Like I said, I've actually earned less working as a newspaper reporter, post college graduation - the popular joke is that we were going to flee across the street and get comparatively high-paying jobs at Wendy's! I was a skilled worker, and I was getting paid less by the hour than untrained high school kids. The newspaper couldn't afford any more than that. That's just the way it goes. Now is a job exploitive simply due to the low pay or because the company can AFFORD to give more?
As for people in a bind, like immigrants and people who are trying to support entire families, it
is arguably exploitive, but I think it depends in large part on the community. As mentioned, if there are other job opportunities for unskilled workers, I see no problem with fast food places paying as low as they want to.