Quote:
Call:
If we want a clearly winnable war with no muss, little fuss, we wouldn't pick a guy who has tons of chemical agents.
Saddam knows this is it. This isn't going to end well for him. He'll be much more likely to release NBC weapons now. This will not be an easy win for us.
If we wanted easy (and a way to perpetuate the oil myth) we would go into Venenzuela and restore order. |
You may be right but that does not seem to be the stance of the current administration. I think Bush will fry if too many of our boys die in a war that MANY (not all of course) consider not necessary.
I honestly am starting to believe (especially from reading others opinion on these boards and reflecting about the last 10 years) that our relationship with Iraq is more than we have seen.
Unlike a lot of left leaning people here I will not directly condemn a war with Iraq. I mean, Saddam is a scumbag, he obviously should be taken out of power. But is this the way to do it? Have we been given a straightforward thorough believable reason as to why we are going in (Im sure most conservatives on these boards would say yes...and that makes me really worry). If it is for noble reasons, thats one thing...but if it for some other reason thats going to really blow. But more than anything else I am scared what this could do in an already fucked up region.
This war could be the one that sets off the people on the fence. The people that already dislike the US but are not ready to put there lives in harms way. I am truly afraid of that happening, because regardless of the size of our military or the defense of our borders they can still get us.