I put this in here because of the freedom of speech angle.
from <a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2078247" target="_blank">http://slate.msn.com/id/2078247</a>
This thread is not about abortion but about the ability of states to create license plates that espouse a certain belief?
What do you think of this?
Quote:
| ]Can state governments endorse speech representing only one side of an issue as controversial as abortion? Has the state, by opening up license plates as a forum for private speech, incurred a constitutional obligation to allow speakers of every viewpoint equal access to that forum? |
This thread is not about abortion but about the ability of states to create license plates that espouse a certain belief?
What do you think of this?
Quote:
| License plates became a constitutional issue in 1977 when the Supreme Court decided Wooley v. Maynard, a case involving a family of Jehovah's Witnesses who had taped over the "Live Free or Die" part of their New Hampshire license plate. The Maynards claimed that New Hampshire violated their free speech rights by forcing them to broadcast a political sentiment with which they disagreed. The high court ruled that states could not force individuals to be "mobile billboards" for messages they loathed. |





