CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bush pushes US into deficit spending
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bush pushes US into deficit spending

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
I can't wait to see this guy booted out of office in 2004...

From AP:

U.S. Moves to Avoid Debt Default
Tue Apr 2,12:34 PM ET
By JEANNINE AVERSA, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration will take steps this week to prevent an unprecedented default on the national debt by moving federal retirement funds into a non-interest-bearing account, freeing up room for more borrowing.


The juggling of federal retirement accounts, which has been done before in standoffs with Congress over raising the debt limit, will not harm federal employees' retirement nest eggs, Treasury officials said Tuesday. The lost interest payments will be made up in coming months.

Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill explained his plans in a letter to congressional leaders.

He said his action involving the Federal Employees Retirement System interest-bearing account known as the G-Fund was done previously in 1995 by Robert Rubin, who was treasury secretary in the Clinton administration.

Without the shifting of funds, Treasury would not have been able to borrow the money it will need in coming weeks to keep the government operating, including making payments on debt that is coming due.

If it had missed those payments, the government would have been technically in default on the $5.95 trillion national debt, something that has never happened in the country's history.

"I know that you share the president's and my commitment to maintaining the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, especially at this critical time," O'Neill said in a letter to congressional leaders.

"Together we must continue working to enact an increase in the statutory debt limit as quickly as possible to avoid any negative repercussions at home or abroad," O'Neill said in his letter.

Republicans, who control the House, lack the votes to pass a measure increasing the debt limit because of opposition from GOP conservatives, who are leery that it will lead to more spending, and from Democrats.

Democrats seek to use the issue to drive home their message that the Bush administration's $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax cut last year was too generous and has pushed the country back into deficit spending.

Republicans counter that the tax cut was needed to lift the country out of recession. They blame the economic downturn and the war against terrorism for bringing back government deficits.

Treasury officials also announced Tuesday that they will auction 19-day and 12-day short-term cash management bills totaling $46 billion on Tuesday and Wednesday to refill government coffers.

Officials said the shift in the federal retirement accounts, which makes room for the increased borrowing, will begin Thursday and continue to around April 18, when the government will be receiving billions of dollars in income tax payments.

O'Neill stressed that the government retirement account "will receive complete restoration of all funds temporarily affected by this necessary action, including full and automatic restoration of any interest that would have been credited to the fund."

Treasury had warned that the $5.95 trillion debt ceiling would be hit sometime this week without action from Congress to raise the borrowing limit.

O'Neill has repeatedly asked Congress to boost the ceiling by $750 billion. But so far, Congress has not moved on the request.

Since the government began raising money to fight World War I in 1917, Congress has let the Treasury borrow the money it wants, as long as it stays within limits set by Congress.
post #2 of 11
*sigh*

I wonder why there wasn't an ardent hue and cry when the last Administration gutted the Military to "balance" his budget? To "project" "surpluses" on the backs of fugures which never quite added up?

Your last administration was really good. They ignored the security of this country to the point where September 11 became an inevitability.

But you don't want to hear the truth so I won't talk about it.
post #3 of 11
Quote:
kronos:

They ignored the security of this country to the point where September 11 became an inevitability.
Ahh, the inevitable backlash against the previous administration. So are you saying it WAS America's fault after all?
post #4 of 11
Yeah, that's right...
post #5 of 11
Damn, Kronos, I remember when you used to have a sense of humor.

All I'm saying is that many conservatives have gone out of their way to absolve any REPUBLICAN administrations of any guilt concerning policies in the Mideast, as if it were some sort of Patriotic Duty in a Time of Crisis, but they have no problems whatsoever linking DEMOCRATIC administrations to the same.

I think there's enough guilt to go around, quite frankly.
post #6 of 11
Quote:
Jacob Singer:
I think there's enough guilt to go around, quite frankly.
Amen!
post #7 of 11
Quote:
Jacob Singer:
Damn, Kronos, I remember when you used to have a sense of humor.

All I'm saying is that many conservatives have gone out of their way to absolve any REPUBLICAN administrations of any guilt concerning policies in the Mideast, as if it were some sort of Patriotic Duty in a Time of Crisis, but they have no problems whatsoever linking DEMOCRATIC administrations to the same.

I think there's enough guilt to go around, quite frankly.
Well, I did roll my eyes! Heh...I've got a headache today...
post #8 of 11
And why is it when the "fiscally conservative" GOP is in office, we go back to deficit spending?

First correct answer gets to be my hero for the day.....
post #9 of 11
Last time I checked, it had somethign to do with 3 passenger jets and a dozen mad Saudis.
post #10 of 11
Quote:
Chavez:
And why is it when the "fiscally conservative" GOP is in office, we go back to deficit spending?

First correct answer gets to be my hero for the day.....
Because it's politically expedient for the Left to use what is basically the same numbers to fit their agenda.

Taxes are pretty much the same.
Spending is pretty much the same, just redirected.
Deficits -no matter how they tried painting "surpluses" in the last Administration- remain the same.

The difference? The reporting. The spin.
post #11 of 11
When the Left uses rhetoric such as "they're balancing the budget on the backs of the poor" they really aren't telling you the truth. Why? Because the economy in this country is not - repeat NOT - a zero-sum game. The money supply is always increasing.

But the left will always try to convince you that there is only a certain amount of money and that the right wants to hoard it all for itself.

Sophistry.

But you don't want to know about the Federal Reserve and how it pretty much controls your life. You don't want to know that you're a slave to the IRS, so I won't say it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bush pushes US into deficit spending