Quote:
The Abominable Doctor Whitehead:
Quote:
Don't let Burke piss you off:
Loss is not an antidote to a belief in God, if you believe that God will do something about that loss. |
But I don't. That's a circular argument, based on the idea that "God", as defined by the Bible and the various branches of Christianity, exists. You believe "He" does. I don't, so therefore neither blame or seek solace from "Him". |
My point was probably stated rather poorly. Throughout our human history, death has walked with us. Loss and pain are a part of our daily lives (as well as the precious joys and epiphanies). I can never truly understand the loss you feel regarding your sister, as you could not understand my losses. We both feel the pain of those losses, but I don’t make that loss the focus of my belief in God. God either exists or does not exist, regardless of my feelings or yours.
[quote]The Abominable Doctor Whitehead:
I asked many questions of myself, both consciously and subconsciously. The ideas put forward by Christianity offered no comfort to me at a time when I desperately needed it. I know this does not fit into your worldview, but it's my reality as I found it. You could argue that I asked the wrong questions, that I wasn't open enough, that somehow it was my fault I didn't find faith.
I never ever blame anyone for not believing the things I do. I was an unbeliever for most of my life so I see your worldview very well. However, you are punishing God or your idea of God, because, in your mind, God failed you. After God fails you, it then becomes easier to dismiss God as a “notion.” That is an extremely common trait among un-believers (DJevil said something similar, HAM as well). For a person to say “God failed me,” I’m sorry but that is not a logical way to determine whether or not there is a God.
Quote:
Originally posted by The Abominable Doctor Whitehead:
[QB]Fact is, I looked and found nothing. Other people look and find every answer they ever wanted. I'm truly happy for them. Maybe even envious. But I can't lie to myself. I do not believe in the Christian religion. It makes no sense to me - an attempt to make sense of the whims of nature, no more or less "true" than Stone Age man worshipping the sun. I believe in forces and energies that affect our lives, but I don't feel the need to give them names and personalities, and I don't believe they are even sentient or aware that we exist. |
When I have a crisis of faith, I go back to the beginning.
“Is this all there is? Is there nothing more?” I don’t believe that to be true. So if there is something more, what would that something more be like? My studies and research have led me to believe that Christianity is the true path, which is reinforced by my “faith” experiences. I can certainly understand not believing. I have been there, and though it felt right at the time, in my opinion, what I believe now is a more truthful picture of God’s reality.
Quote:
The Abominable Doctor Whitehead:
You see, I found that Christianity is what you make of it. What about people who preach intolerance in the name of Christ? Well, they're bad Christians, don't worry about them. OK, what about this wacky "original sin" idea? That's a Catholic thing, there are versions of Christianity without that stuff if it puts you off. What if I just want a comforting cushion to take the harsh edges off the world, without too much mumbo-jumbo? Oh yes, we have that too. I'm sure you can find a version that suits you. It seems to me that there is no such thing as "Christianity". It's a loose description for a bunch of notionally similar beliefs, all stemming from the same source material. Each one believes that they are the correct interpretation. None of them know why, other than the fact that "they just know". |
There aren’t any Christians that have been 100% correct about Christianity. Whatever version you ascribe too, there is only one real version. Just because there are heresies does not invalidate or cast doubt upon the reality. I hate it when people say, “they just know.” God created us with a brain; use it. Evidence is never un-important. If you don’t have evidence, what do you have?
Quote:
The Abominable Doctor Whitehead:
Seems to me I might as well just find my own way through this maze. Make my own enquiries. Draw my own conclusions. Cut out the middle man. That's what I've done. But as I did it myself, why should I call any answers I found "God"? I could credit them to Kermit The Frog if it helped me fit them into my frame of reference. Some people find "it" and know instinctively that it's "God". Others would call it "Allah". Yet more would believe it's a mind-message from people on Venus. I live a good life. I try to be a good person. I adhere to many of the ideals Christians hold sacred. But I don't need to ally myself to any one explanation, be it Christian, Muslim or whatever, to do that.
I'm sure if we discussed right and wrong, morals and ethics, we'd find that we agree on most things. Your conviction comes from Christ. Mine comes from myself. Both are valid, if they make us better people.
I am a spiritual person, but I am in no way a religious person. That's the crucial difference. |
Whatever you call God, God is what God is. The question is “What does God want us to call God? What is God like?” If God is good, what does God think of me? I can’t say I don’t arrogantly think that I’m a good person, but in the end I know that I fail. My convictions come from myself as well, but I know that God forgives me when I err… even if I don’t know I have erred.
Regardless, God is what God is and nothing you or I say can change that. Your beliefs appear as strong as mine, but we can’t both be right. I would prefer to be right, even if the answer made me unhappy then to live a lie. I’m not a perfect person, far from it, but I believe that God loves me anyway… and that God has given me more than I could have ever hoped for… because God is real.
(I apologize for the poor writing as I am at work. Other examples of poor writing on my behalf have similar excuses.)