This seems like as good a place as any to post this.
A Talkback at AICN had an interesting post from the self-righteous AICN scourge TheFacer. It alledged that Harry ran an article casually listing DVD's he's been watching recently was a disguised promotion for said DVD's. Facer claimed most of the discs mentioned just came down in price or were rereleased today. I don't know if that's true or not, but if it is, it's some food for thought.
Anyway, AICN's server was (typically) overloaded and I couldn't get on to discuss. But I thought maybe you guys would like to.
My take- Facer is a self-important blowhard that needs to reevaluate his priorities in life, but the psycho-stalker is on to something. Harry's site is considered the most widely known and influential of it's kind. I harbor no ill will towards Harry, but the guy's a buffoon. I don't doubt that many of his "reviews" are shaded by free "pwesents" and compliments from Hollywood players, whether he's aware of it or not. I'm sure the guy also considers himself some kind of gonzo journalist, taking pride in his inability to write coherently.
The problem I have is this is the guy who is representative of film sites on the web. Sites like CHUD and FilmThreat are both infinitely better in terms of content and style (not to mention journalistic integrity), and yet Hollywood seems to bow to the whims of the internet equivalent of Simpsons' Comic Store Guy.
Anyway, those are my thoughts. What are yours?
A Talkback at AICN had an interesting post from the self-righteous AICN scourge TheFacer. It alledged that Harry ran an article casually listing DVD's he's been watching recently was a disguised promotion for said DVD's. Facer claimed most of the discs mentioned just came down in price or were rereleased today. I don't know if that's true or not, but if it is, it's some food for thought.
Anyway, AICN's server was (typically) overloaded and I couldn't get on to discuss. But I thought maybe you guys would like to.
My take- Facer is a self-important blowhard that needs to reevaluate his priorities in life, but the psycho-stalker is on to something. Harry's site is considered the most widely known and influential of it's kind. I harbor no ill will towards Harry, but the guy's a buffoon. I don't doubt that many of his "reviews" are shaded by free "pwesents" and compliments from Hollywood players, whether he's aware of it or not. I'm sure the guy also considers himself some kind of gonzo journalist, taking pride in his inability to write coherently.
The problem I have is this is the guy who is representative of film sites on the web. Sites like CHUD and FilmThreat are both infinitely better in terms of content and style (not to mention journalistic integrity), and yet Hollywood seems to bow to the whims of the internet equivalent of Simpsons' Comic Store Guy.
Anyway, those are my thoughts. What are yours?






