CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Serious discussion: New members who don't post about movies and only attack people
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Serious discussion: New members who don't post about movies and only attack people

post #1 of 54
Thread Starter 
What's your take on this?

I would say either someone's fakester account or a honest to goodness troll.
post #2 of 54
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Lydia:
My, you are a nasty, spiteful little twerp aren't you?

I'm not sure why anyone wants to waste time responding to all the hate you're spewing.
Even though I disagree with others here they seem capable of expressing their thoughts without the malice and ill will you seem to think is so clever.

You seem a little to impressed with your own limited knowledge. So let me treat you as I would a child who doesn't know when to stop:

Simply rolling my eyes and trying to ignore you.
Third post ever! Second one was making fun of me for being from NYC.
post #3 of 54
troll and/or read the main boards, didn't add anything but later found the sex thread and posted about getting an STD.
post #4 of 54
Part of the reason I signed up was to debate someone I thought was dead wrong in politics and religion...

I don't know if some 8,000 posts later I remain a troll though but I suppose anything is possible...
post #5 of 54
Thread Starter 
I think if you only want to argue politics there are plenty of places to go.

This is a movie site that has a place for movie people to argue politics.
post #6 of 54
Thread Starter 
Oh really? I only see you in Politics or flaming me. Weird.
post #7 of 54
Thread Starter 
Anyway, I've seen you post on Scorched Planet. So whatever.
post #8 of 54
Thread Starter 
Hey you wear the semantics and niggling details well.

You guys don't remember what CHUD used to be, but these boards were never that big. They were pretty much always about movies, but sometimes other topics would creep in and so the other forums were created to unclutter the Main Sewer. (hell, it took forever to get a TV forum)

Back in the day since everybody was usually only talking movies with SOME current event-y stuff thrown in, it was no big deal.

But now we have people who seem to only register here to talk politics, and I think that's not what this site is about. I'm not speaking for Nick or anyone else, just my two cents. And I know there will be decent posters who chime in here and say "I never post about movies" and that's a shame, because you should. It's why we're here, right?

It seems to these eyes that a lot of this place has degenerated into weird post whoring threads like "CHUD late night" and "Chewer Above You" as well as creating this weird little land down south of the movie forums which has its own inhabitants. Some people have said we should kill the politics forums - I wouldn't be against that at all. Hell, i still think that all the non-movie/non-arts related forums should be smooshed back into "Culture and Free Form."

Anyway, my point is that since this is a movie site it would be nice if everyone here was a movie person first and then talked about whatever else. But I couldn't tell you a movie that the Key of Sixth or Lydia have SEEN, let alone liked or what they thought about them.
post #9 of 54
Thread Starter 
That's bullshit. What these mini-trolls do is lurk, lurk and lurk some more and read everything one of us posts and then lays in. This person with 2 posts ever is a blank slate - you can't retaliate. And these two people in particular, Key of Sixth and Lydia, jumped right in with personal stuff as soon as they started posting.

I think the kind of person who signs up just to post in the politics forum doesn't belong here.
post #10 of 54
Thread Starter 
It's not a bitch, it's annoying. Hey, to use a stupid analogy, it's like being a gunslinger, everybody wants to take a shot at you to prove themselves. I accept that. I'm a lightning rod in these parts, so be it.

But people who register to do that will never bring reasonable discussion anywhere.
post #11 of 54
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
Back in the day since everybody was usually only talking movies with SOME current event-y stuff thrown in, it was no big deal.

But now we have people who seem to only register here to talk politics, and I think that's not what this site is about.
I don't think this would be such a problem, if that is even the correct term, if this summer's movies hadn't been so craptacular. Honestly, the only movies that really inspired me to talk about them this year were Matrix Reloaded, LotR, and a handful of others. If I remember correctly, I registered here back during the Equilibrium craze, and have since wandered south, as almost all of the movies I've seen lately have inspired no more reaction than "well, at least the popcorn was good."
post #12 of 54
Quote:
The cruel tutelage of David Manning:
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
But people who register to do that will never bring reasonable discussion anywhere.
Devin, I haven't seen reasonable discussion around here in months. Even with a crew of seasoned regulars, it all ends up with somebody calling someone else a cocksucker.

There isn't the core of mutual respect necessary to sustain such discussions, and there's too much water under the bridge to start now.
That I can certainly believe...
post #13 of 54
Thread Starter 
Quote:
thomas.galvin:
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
Back in the day since everybody was usually only talking movies with SOME current event-y stuff thrown in, it was no big deal.

But now we have people who seem to only register here to talk politics, and I think that's not what this site is about.
I don't think this would be such a problem, if that is even the correct term, if this summer's movies hadn't been so craptacular. Honestly, the only movies that really inspired me to talk about them this year were Matrix Reloaded, LotR, and a handful of others. If I remember correctly, I registered here back during the Equilibrium craze, and have since wandered south, as almost all of the movies I've seen lately have inspired no more reaction than "well, at least the popcorn was good."
You would think that out of a hundred years of cinema we could find something to talk about.
post #14 of 54
I will say that I've rather inadvertantly doubled my post total.

Thanks Devin!

And for what it's worth:

Kill Bill was spectacular
The Matrix Reloaded was better than average
The Hulk was insanely underrated
Bill Murray's performance in Lost in Translation is pretty awful.
I'll try to be first in line with my better half to see TCM
post #15 of 54
Quote:
CTDeLude (CHUDpublican):
Quote:
The cruel tutelage of David Manning:
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
But people who register to do that will never bring reasonable discussion anywhere.
Devin, I haven't seen reasonable discussion around here in months. Even with a crew of seasoned regulars, it all ends up with somebody calling someone else a cocksucker.

There isn't the core of mutual respect necessary to sustain such discussions, and there's too much water under the bridge to start now.
That I can certainly believe...
Then why do you bother coming back here?

And I'm not trying to be a smartass, I'm genuinely curious as to why you'd come back to a place that you think has no hope to produce good discussion.
post #16 of 54
I'll say - and I think Dev will agree - that these boards had long-standing feuds, knockdown dragout fights, and trolls long before we adopted Politics or Religion forums.

And they'll have them after we get rid of them.

Bad blood is bad blood. X Chewer will annoy you in the discussion for Kill Bill just as much as they will mocking a religion or whatever.

But like Dev, I have no love for Chewers who come here merely to argue. Hell, I love reasoned debate. Point/counterpoint/rebuttal. It can be a beautiful thing. But I don't understand why the animosity has to go beyond that.

I have Chewers I don't like and Chewers who don't like me, but I think we do a pretty good job of staying away from each other without a lot of effort. No need for either of us to trouble the other.

I just wish more people here could operate the same way.
post #17 of 54
Thread Starter 
I consider this first and formost a movie site message board. It's the only reason I am here.
post #18 of 54
I've never seen people at CHUD make an effort to "run out" a new poster unless they were pissing A LOT of different people off.

Hell, I can't tell you how many times obvious trolls have been vigorously defended, much to their entertainment elsewhere.

In fact, this is one of the "newbie friendly"-iest communities I've seen.

In my opinion.

But as Devin said, it's a movie site first and foremost. Why would anyone even discover CHUD if not for the movie aspects? I hardly think our political or religious commentary is THAT alluring that it's revered throughout the Internet drawing new participants/combatants/spectators on the regular.
post #19 of 54
Thread Starter 
Quote:
The cruel tutelage of David Manning:
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
I consider this first and formost a movie site message board. It's the only reason I am here.
Devin, the vast majority of your posts are in the politics and religion forums.
<a href="http://chud.com/board/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=recent_user_posts;u=00000443" target="_blank">Devin's recent posts</a>

In the interests of full disclosure:
<a href="http://chud.com/board/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=recent_user_posts;u=00003004" target="_blank">Manning's recent posts</a>

I think we'd all be better off if we spent more time bitching about film, and less time talking about bush, the gaza strip, and the like.
Those are my RECENT posts. I have a ludicrously high post total, I am certain most of those posts are not in that forum.
post #20 of 54
Quote:
I agree to an extent. I discovered CHUD for the movie news. However, I was allured to the message board because of the vast amount of acceptable topics to post on. Does that make sense?
Yes, it does. There is rather a lot to talk about in multiple forums.

post #21 of 54
Thread Starter 
Not to turn into the whiny updater, but I make my thoughts on the latest film news known on this site almost daily.
post #22 of 54
Thread Starter 
I thought you claimed ignorance of that site before.

Weird.
post #23 of 54
Quote:
The cruel tutelage of David Manning:
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
Not to turn into the whiny updater, but I make my thoughts on the latest film news known on this site almost daily.
Yeah, you do. And that is to be commended.

Maybe people would discuss the things you post on the main page if they weren't so caught up in the politics & religion threads.

Sad truth is -- the sewer is something of a dull forum these days... it used to be the lifeblood of the website.
But a serious aspect to the used to be part is the sheer size of the membership and the pigeon-holing of topic forums. There used to be discussion of upcomings, questions of personalities, and movie site news discussion all in the same forum. That's the times you are refering to.
post #24 of 54
Thread Starter 
"My time would be better spent jimmying open Capone's safe."

Jimmy. Funny. How are the trees in that forest, Jimmy?
post #25 of 54
I see this is starting to degenerate already...

Anyway, I too started out posting exclusivly in the Sewer, but the allure of a few forums claimed me. Now, the Sewer is getting kind of lame. I don't know if its because I personally have lost some enthusiam for movies, or its because of the current crop of movies, or the amount of forums, or any other reason.

But posters can be attracted to CHUD for the movie NEWS but when they came to the MB, they found a community where they didn't want to discuss movies, but many other things. With the amount of forums CHUD has now, a poster doesn't really have to talk about movies to contribute to the community (lord knows I don't all that often), but can talk about many other things.

Of course, I don't post all that often, and I now tend to avoid forums like Politics, but thats just my 2 cents.
post #26 of 54
Quote:
Lydia:
Bill Murray's performance in Lost in Translation is pretty awful.
It's all becoming clear now...
post #27 of 54
While it is not a requirement nor a necessity to post in the Main Sewer portion of this extravaganza in order to be a Chewer, we can all agree on the moral imperative to read CHUD.com proper.
post #28 of 54
Agreed.

I head to CHUD before I even check my mail every time I get online.
post #29 of 54
I rarely post about movies here anymore. A lot of the movie threads get so bloated with posts that don't really add to the discussion that I don't feel like reading through them. I don't see that many movies in the theater as it is, and if I ever do feel like posting about one the thread for it is usually already over three pages long. Whats the point?
post #30 of 54
This might be a stupid-assed suggestion, but have you--and by you, I'm talking about complainers on both sides of the fence here--just thought about fucking ignoring people?

Seriously, it works. The Scorched Planet guys are here looking to get a reaction, cause let's face it...trolling is fun. I did it for almost two years on AICN under about 70 different handles after Knowles severely pissed me off one day. It's fun pissing people off and listening to them whine, splutter, or bluster. It kills the boredom. And the SP guys are harassing you, Devin, because you always respond to them. They know that you'll always take the bait. Ignore them and it's no longer fun. They'll stop trolling you and move on to a different target. Probably fucking me or somebody, but oh well.

And CTDelude and all the people who can't stop whining about Devin...just let it go. Jesus Christ, if he says something that pisses you off and you try to argue with him, he's just going to say something else that will piss you off, and bam, the discussion turns into a flame war. Devin or anybody else can't ruin your threads if you don't take the bait and run with it like mad bastards. There are plenty of people here who annoy me, but I don't follow, say, Bunny Dracula around in every thread and try to start shit with him/her/whatever. I just ignore him. It's easy.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is none of my business. But I can promise you this thread will be five pages of venom in less than twenty-four hours, and it's all such a stupid waste of time. Damn near all the problems on these boards could be avoided if people here would just take the goddamned higher road once in a while. These stupid little whinefests are going to get the boards shut down eventually. Quit fucking it up for the rest of us who just want to hang out, make a few dumb jokes, and talk about movies.
post #31 of 54
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:


It seems to these eyes that a lot of this place has degenerated into weird post whoring threads like "CHUD late night" and "Chewer Above You" as well as creating this weird little land down south of the movie forums which has its own inhabitants. Some people have said we should kill the politics forums - I wouldn't be against that at all. Hell, i still think that all the non-movie/non-arts related forums should be smooshed back into "Culture and Free Form."
I get your point about people registering just to be assholes (qwerty, other SP bitches) and can agree with that one hundred percent. However, some of us like to be friendly and that may be trivial to you, but the Chewers thread allows us to communicate and discuss things other than movies. I don't see how that hurts you but either way, deal with it. Don't post in the threads you don't like and for fuck's sake, stop trolling in them.

post #32 of 54
Thread Starter 
There's a chatroom for that.
post #33 of 54
Thread Starter 
And I fail to see how correcting a mistake is trolling.
post #34 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
There's a chatroom for that.
AND there's a forum for it too. Crazy!
post #35 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
And I fail to see how correcting a mistake is trolling.
Do I even need to address that? Sure, I'll humor you. You did that because you hate the thread and you wanted us to know that you're hot shit because Momo made a mistake and said they were called Men In Hats instead of Men Without Hats. You showed him!
post #36 of 54
Thread Starter 
That's the way to show someone you're hot shit, alright. Jesus Christ, I was looking at the Active Threads page and that jumped out at me. Get more thin skinned.
post #37 of 54
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Swykk : Kubb Icon:
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
There's a chatroom for that.
AND there's a forum for it too. Crazy!
There's a postwhoring and vapid thread forum? If I had known...

You know what? You have the right to waste bandwidth all you like, just like I have the right to think it's stupid and annoying. Ta da!
post #38 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
That's the way to show someone you're hot shit, alright. Jesus Christ, I was looking at the Active Threads page and that jumped out at me. Get more thin skinned.
You mean thick-skinned? Anyway, last time I checked this site was owned by Nick Nunziata not Devin Faraci. I respect you and what you do for CHUD, Devin (Yeah, I'm one of ten people that read the main page), but you'd be unstoppable if you could cut out bullshit like this. You're a smart guy, why waste your time on shit you can't control? Again, if you don't like the thread, you don't have to click on it OR reply. And it's not "wasted bandwidth" for the people that post in whatever thread you hate this week.

post #39 of 54
Thread Starter 
No, get more thin skinned. I was being sarcastic, oh mighty flame warrior.
post #40 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
No, get more thin skinned. I was being sarcastic, oh mighty flame warrior.
I'm not flaming you, I'm just trying to see what you think you can accomplish by this. I've never flamed you, even in the Palahniuk thread you made my questions and statements were non offensive.
post #41 of 54
Thread Starter 
Thanks for derailing the fuck out of this thread.

Where's Mikah when I need him.
post #42 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
Thanks for derailing the fuck out of this thread.

Where's Mikah when I need him.
I don't see how this is derailing when I'm right on topic in talking about things you've referenced herein (the Late Night Thread especially or ANY thread you find to be useless). If Mikah finds me to be in the wrong, I'll respectfully stop posting here. I just wanted some answers.

post #43 of 54
Nick and anyone else given the authority by Nick to oversee the boards are the only ones who get to decide which subjects belong on the CHUD message boards. Until such time as all non-movie forums are taken down, I will continue to enjoy myself and post on these boards in whatever forums suit me. If that includes "post-whoring" in the Chud Late Night thread or similar long-running threads because I've made some friends there, so be it.

Devin, if you really want to improve the emotional health of the boards, stop posting in the politics and religion forums. I really cannot recall any of your movie-related posts that stand out as much as several of your confrontations with Republicans and Christians. I agree with a lot of what you have to say, and I think you are a pretty good writer on the main page, but most of the time on the boards you come off as an antagonistic prick. Who is accountable for that?
post #44 of 54
Thread Starter 
I give up. No thread can go without turning into "devin's a dick."

Someone close this.
post #45 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
I give up. No thread can go without turning into "devin's a dick."

Someone close this.
Oh, whatever, I never said you were a dick. I disagreed with you and made statements to showcase my side of the issue(s).
post #46 of 54
I never said you were a dick. Or a prick. But obviously you are unwilling to even think about avoiding the threads that bother you so much or add to your reputation. Do you approach Nick with your grievances? He's the one who should hear them.
post #47 of 54
Thread Starter 
What grievances? I don't believe in "Threads That Annoy You" or Star Chamber. Not my thing. I have a problem, I see something worth commenting on, I do it in this forum.

I'm not going to bug Nick telling him that I think one thread is stupid or something. And that's not what this fucking thread was about.
post #48 of 54
Quote:
Crisis on Infinite devincfs:
That's bullshit. What these mini-trolls do is lurk, lurk and lurk some more and read everything one of us posts and then lays in. This person with 2 posts ever is a blank slate - you can't retaliate.
By that do you mean you can't retaliate by making sly insults about peoples personal lifes? Like being a Carny or whatever?
post #49 of 54
Quote:
Bucky Wunderlickcf:
What grievances? I don't believe in "Threads That Annoy You" or Star Chamber. Not my thing. I have a problem, I see something worth commenting on, I do it in this forum.

I'm not going to bug Nick telling him that I think one thread is stupid or something. And that's not what this fucking thread was about.
I didn't think you were talking about one specific thread. This site has over 7,200 registered members, and you think that making comments in one of the forums will have more of an effect than talking to the owner of the site? I don't see how. There are too many people here to expect a culture change from the inside out. If I have a serious problem with how the boards are running, I will send Nick a PM or email. Though I believe he would take me seriously, I think he'd have more of a reason to read your correspondence than mine, since you work for the site and you have been here much longer than I have.

I'm not convinced that you want to solve a problem here.
post #50 of 54
I like where this discussion can go, but please keep it civil. I'm not going to be on the boards a lot today, so I'm asking for self-restraint here.

If we can't discuss a serious topic like this without it dissolving into yet another breeding ground for feuds and insults, then we have a MAJOR problem. I know you guys are better than that.

That means STICK TO THE TOPIC, which is not Devin or any Chewer in particular. If I check in later this morning and the discussion is not back squarely on-topic, I will close this thread.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Serious discussion: New members who don't post about movies and only attack people