CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Jabbadonut vs STARCHAMBER: The War Trilogy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Jabbadonut vs STARCHAMBER: The War Trilogy

post #1 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:14am
Thread Starter 
Check this out in the Politics forum. Immensely enjoyable. Better than the Prequels.
Reply
post #2 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:17am
Thread Starter 
It's gone to a Part IV!
Reply
post #3 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:18am
They've been more than patient with him.
Reply
post #4 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:19am
Man, they were milkin' it. But the taxi chase in part 4 was kinda cool.
Reply
post #5 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:22am
Let's just hope there's not a War prequel trilogy that rapes my childhood.
Reply
post #6 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:23am
STAR CHAMBER shoots first my ass.
Reply
post #7 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:23am
Devin makes the greatest threads ever.
Reply
post #8 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:24am
Laugharn, stop being so witty, ya bastard.
Reply
post #9 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:30am
This is just beyond sad.
Reply
post #10 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:49am
He's up to thread #5! He will not yield!!!

ATTICA! ATTICA! ATTICA!
Reply
post #11 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:52am
Heh, this is fun!
Reply
post #12 of 37
3/19/03 at 12:56am
Okay, this is just getting tiresome.
Reply
post #13 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:06am
Does that mean no The War VII?

frown
Reply
post #14 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:07am
Yeah, if we don't get a The War VII I will be very sad.
Reply
post #15 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:10am
It's done.

Next subject, please.
Reply
post #16 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:11am
The War: Mission to Moscow was pretty disappointing.
Reply
post #17 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:20am
Jabba, I was as vocal a critic of the Star Chamber as anybody, but this? No. You're clearly in the wrong here.
Reply
post #18 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:27am
No way. We all know Laugharn has it out for Jabba!
Reply
post #19 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:45am
Jabba. The knock on your door is reality.
Reply
post #20 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:45am
The problem is, previous discussions were brought to your attention very early on, but you kept starting threads, for no other apparent reason than to be annoying. When we pointed out threads had been pointed out, you gave some excuse that made you sound horribly, horribly lazy (the search function is RIGHT THERE, MAN.)
Reply
post #21 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:49am
Jabba! Duh! They pointed out the other threads where just the discussion you wanted was already taking place. So just go there and discuss already! You're the only one losing face here.
Reply
post #22 of 37
3/19/03 at 1:59am
Those threads are unbelievably funny - so I guess the question is, if the STAR CHAMBER just let him go with his first 'War' thread, would any of this happened?
Reply
post #23 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:12am
I'm speaking here not just as a member of the Star Chamber, but also as a fellow Chewer, and I think this whole bout was utter bullshit.

We have a forum for humor and we have a forum for pointless threads. And I don't think it's too much to ask that material of that nature be put there.

But willful disobedience just to amuse yourself? Well, by nature, it's selfish. By objective appraisal, it's juvenile. And by my personal standards, it's just plain rude and inconsiderate.

I don't live to be a SC member. I much prefer to be able to come onto the boards after a screening and just focus on discussion of that film or catching up on political or culture discussion.

But thanks to you, Jabba, I spent most of my time here tonight trying to reason with a petulant toddler who thought he was making a funny.

He wasn't.
Reply
post #24 of 37
3/19/03 at 4:55am
A day on CHUD is like a day on the farm.

Every meal's a banquet...

Every rant's a song...

Every formation a parade...I love CHUD.

Anybody ever feel like this place just turned into Futureworld from Logan's Run?
Reply
post #25 of 37
3/19/03 at 5:25am
<img src="http://innergrail.com/misc/jabba.jpg" alt="" />
Reply
post #26 of 37
3/19/03 at 6:12am
Edited because I realized at about six am that Poxy made this joke already, and better.

Reply
post #27 of 37
3/19/03 at 7:05am
Lame beyond words.

Reply
post #28 of 37
3/19/03 at 7:10am
I'd personally have more respect for The CHUD ******* if it was named something cooler.

Like Megaforce.

Deeds, Not Posts...
Reply
post #29 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:26pm
Glad to see grim_fist can still make me laugh...

Where ya at Fist?
Reply
post #30 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:38pm
YO!
Reply
post #31 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:47pm
Quote:
STAR CHAMBER
What a lovely waste of Nick's bandwidth.
OK now I klnow SC was in the right but COME ON. Far more bandwidth is wasted in the Draft picture threads. And talk about stealing VAST amounts of bandwidth by remote linking. When will that be stopped?
Reply
post #32 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:58pm
Leeching from other sites is something the SC is cracking down on. Pics are only allowed to be posted if it is hosted from your own site. Exceptions are if it is part of a draft, "Chewer photo" thread, or "caption this" thread.

Within those threads, it is strongly encouraged that a photo be posted only ONCE. If you want to comment on a picture, you can do so without reposting the pic in your response.

Any other time, please use a link. It's not that much effort for us to click on it to see the photo.
Reply
post #33 of 37
3/19/03 at 2:58pm
Quote:
Miaowara Tomokato (Scott Roche):
OK now I klnow SC was in the right but COME ON. Far more bandwidth is wasted in the Draft picture threads. And talk about stealing VAST amounts of bandwidth by remote linking. When will that be stopped?
The difference is that those are Nick-sanctioned activities and he has dealt with the consequences and ramifications of those actions.

This is specifically a Nick-prohibited activity and someone else had to deal with the consequences and ramifications of it.

They're not even comparable.
Reply
post #34 of 37
3/19/03 at 5:50pm
Gosh that was funny. Thanks for pointing that out.

I'm of the opinion that the first thread shouldn't have been closed and that Jabba was just being stupid by starting all the others.
Reply
post #35 of 37
3/19/03 at 8:40pm
Wait. So now we can't post picture here?

When will being witty or having a point be outlawed too?
Reply
post #36 of 37
3/19/03 at 8:59pm
If you have your own hosting, then pictures are ok. If it's a pic already on CHUD's server, it's ok.

If you go to Google Images and find a pic of Bridget Fonda or a goofy-looking clam somewhere and post it, chances are good that the pic is sucking someone else's bandwidth.

The grey areas I feel Nick and/or Micah need to fill in. But that's the long and short of it.

FYI
Reply
post #37 of 37
3/19/03 at 9:37pm
The best way to get a picture to be left alone is to host it on your own server.

Barring that, put it up here for a reason. Sex forum...draft pictures...whatever. If we're going to leech bandwith from other sites, I want it to count for something.

Just randomly reposting the picture of the giant slug that looks like a limp cock? No-no. We've all seen it once. You can just link to it now. People will still click on it. You'll still be clever. Honest. But it's more considerate to other websites.

Even with these rules, we'll evaluate things on an individual basis. So loosen up your knickers. Nothing to cry about.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › Jabbadonut vs STARCHAMBER: The War Trilogy