CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Budding Filmmakers › Locations...Real or Studio?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Locations...Real or Studio?

post #1 of 5
9/17/02 at 1:32pm
Thread Starter 
Which do u prefer to shoot at?
I know that obviously u get more control over the elements in a studio and obviously it can help with the budget if ur not shipping everything around all the time but which is ur preference?.
me i love filming on location, it definately makes the flick seem more real to me, plus u can have a lot of fun with it.
I appreciate a studio set-up but do prefer the look, especially the interior shots, of a location.

Anyone?
Reply
post #2 of 5
9/17/02 at 1:56pm
I am much more a fan (in theory) of real settings. it just feels more organic and I believe it can also have a good affect on the actors. Get them in the creative mindset. Get inspired. Studios diffenetly give you control over things but I am idealistic of the effect a real enviornment can have on a movie.
Reply
post #3 of 5
9/17/02 at 6:39pm
I really like the real thing. It does limit you somewhat, but it has a real sense of life to it.
Reply
post #4 of 5
9/17/02 at 11:59pm
I also prefer the real thing, it makes a movie more, well...real. I understand the benifits of shooting in studio but whenever possible, I'd prefer to shoot on location.
Reply
post #5 of 5
9/18/02 at 12:05am
I give you Streets of Fire. Totally studio, totally cool.

This was a film that made it perfectly clear they were on a soundstage. And it worked.

I remember seeing the set too at Universal...really cool piece of work. I love studios and sets.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Budding Filmmakers
CHUD.com Community › Forums › ARTS & LITERATURE › Budding Filmmakers › Locations...Real or Studio?