Quote:
Originally posted by SouthBay1 MoNkaholic, I never said "good closer = postseason success". All I know is Grady Little took a huge risk letting Pedro stay in because he had no confidence in his bullpen (Timlin was pitching well in the postseason - should have brought him in) and Grady is now unemployed. |
As he should be, he refused to trust his bullpen, which cost his franchise a shot at the World Series.
Quote:
Originally posted by SouthBay1 Gagne got all the saves fair and square - he didn't blow ANY chances - that is incredible. It's not his fault the Dodgers had no offense. If it hadn't been for Gagne the Dodgers would have been out of wild card contention in June. |
Yes it's a great accomplishment to go a season without blowing a save, never meant to imply that it wasn't. But of all the closers, he was coddled the most. He faced the fewest inherited runners, and only came into two tough situations all season--and blew them. In September after all the stats and all the media play, when they needed their best arm in a tough spot in the 8th, I saw them throw in Mota, not Gagne. To me, if you want to be an elite closer,
you have to be the one to go in when the team needs their best reliever, regardless of whether it's the 8th or the 9th. Remember my term is
overrated, not unimportant.
Simply put, theres a drop off. You have a handfull of elite closers in MLB that are worth every penny, and the rest are overpaid relievers. Almost every team in MLB can scour through their system and find a closer that can be succesful. Finding one that you can give the ball to in a tough spot? Well that's something entirely different. Let's look at Byung Hyun Kim. In 2001, up until the Yankees series, he was automatic. Everyone lauded his statistics, but when he went up against the Yankees in a tough spot he blew it. Now he's probably going to get converted into a starter because he has no use to Boston otherwise. Everyone talks about how great Billy Wagner is, but ask a Houston fan if they want to see him in a tough spot in September. Outside of that handfull of elite closers, just about every one of them is successful as a whole, but untrustworthy when the chips are down.
Quote:
Originally posted by SouthBay1 Worrell was already a good closer before he took over for Nenn. And the Astros obviously think enough of Dotel to let Wagner go to my Phillies. And I completely reject your premise that it's "easy" to make a closer. Not everyone can handle the pressure - see the Korean kid in Boston.
If you really believe that closers aren't important, you should walk around NYC and tell everyone wearing a Yankees hat that George should unload Rivera. You'll either get thrown in the Hudson River or people will look at you like you have a dick growing out of your forehead. |
First, Worrell
WAS NOT already a good closer before he took over. He had all of 7 saves in the 10 years prior to 2003, perhaps you missed something there. Second, closers in general are
overrated, not unimportant. Hell, if you go up you'll even see I say that theres a handfull of elite closers-Rivera included-and the rest are just overpaid fireballers, but ok, let's just not read what people write. In the end, they are part of your bullpen, which is an incredibly important part of any team. My issue is giving guys like Keith Foulke $8 million a season, when if you ask Billy Beane, his goto guy is Chad Bradford.