CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › 9/11 lawsuit: Bush let 9/11 happen for war profiteering
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

9/11 lawsuit: Bush let 9/11 happen for war profiteering

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
I don't know how it will be possible to prove these allegations in court, but if nothing else, this lawsuit could shake things up a bit.

"Plaintiff asserts, contrary to Defendant GWB's assertion that OBL is responsible for '911,' the compelling evidence that will be presented in this case through discovery, subpoena[s] and testimony at trial will lead to one undisputed fact, Defendant GWB failed to act and prevent '911' knowing the attacks would lead to our nation having to engage in an 'International War on Terror' which would benefit Defendants both financially and for political reasons. There are significant business ties that will be proven between Defendants and OBL's family which raise serious conflict of interest and other matters wherein 'failing to act and prevent' the '911' attacks have benefited Defendants. Reports have emerged and will be confirmed through discovery that the Carlyle Group, the giant U.S. defense contractor until recently employed Defendant and former President GHB. Hence, the 'Bush Family' and other Defendants financial profiting by war goes to the heart of Plaintiff's RICO Act claim."

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0311/S00261.htm
post #2 of 9
"While America was under attack, for approximately the next seven (7) to eighteen (18) minutes Defendant GWB continues to listen to the goat story while Plaintiff's husband was just murdered and does not immediately assume his duties as Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces."

gotta love that legalese.
post #3 of 9
Wow, this is hilarious. I wonder if the lawyer is exploiting this lady's grief or if she's the a bit off and actually believes in this lawsuit.

This is interesting;

Quote:

** Copy of sixty-one [61] page Amended Complaint available by e-mail” – contact Phil Berg at PJBLAW@aol.com

///////

[Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an attorney with offices in Montgomery County and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA.]
aol.com? You'd think a lawyer would have a more formal email address. Is this guy a mail order lawyer? Sounds like somebody is getting scammed.
post #4 of 9
She's using RICO to sue the President?

I thought that racketeering cases were criminal, not civil, so even if she did prove that Bush did it, she wouldn't get money for it.
post #5 of 9
Ok, I've got some issues with Bush, the War on Terror, and the Iraqi cleanup efforts, but this is the most rediculous thing I've read in a good, long while, and is going to go absolutley nowhere.
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally posted by sorro
She's using RICO to sue the President?

I thought that racketeering cases were criminal, not civil, so even if she did prove that Bush did it, she wouldn't get money for it.
RICO has both criminal and civil provisions, but the courts have done their best to gut civil RICO with interesting interpretations of the statute. Unless I am mistaken, a larger-than-usual number of civil RICO causes of action are thrown out. Expect that result here.
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
I don't interpret this as a bad thing, if it gets anywhere. The White House is stonewalling. Whatever the truth is, Bush doesn't want it known. The mechanism for shaking it loose is almost irrelevant. What is it going to take to get Bush and co. to come clean as they continue to use 9/11 as a photo op for the '04 reelection campaign?
post #8 of 9
Photo op for '04? And here I thought it would be the head of Saddam when the planned Spring capture would take place...
post #9 of 9
Thread Starter 
Not bad, Kronos.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › 9/11 lawsuit: Bush let 9/11 happen for war profiteering