CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Halliburton Continues to Overcharge for Oil
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Halliburton Continues to Overcharge for Oil

post #1 of 15
Thread Starter 
From the NY Times:

High Payments to Halliburton for Fuel in Iraq
By DON VAN NATTA Jr.

Published: December 10, 2003

The United States government is paying the Halliburton Company an average of $2.64 a gallon to import gasoline and other fuel to Iraq from Kuwait, more than twice what others are paying to truck in Kuwaiti fuel, government documents show.

Halliburton, which has the exclusive United States contract to import fuel into Iraq, subcontracts the work to a Kuwaiti firm, government officials said. But Halliburton gets 26 cents a gallon for its overhead and fee, according to documents from the Army Corps of Engineers.

The cost of the imported fuel first came to public attention in October when two senior Democrats in Congress criticized Halliburton, the huge Houston-based oil-field services company, for "inflating gasoline prices at a great cost to American taxpayers." At the time, it was estimated that Halliburton was charging the United States government and Iraq's oil-for-food program an average of about $1.60 a gallon for fuel available for 71 cents wholesale.

But a breakdown of fuel costs, contained in Army Corps documents recently provided to Democratic Congressional investigators and shared with The New York Times, shows that Halliburton is charging $2.64 for a gallon of fuel it imports from Kuwait and $1.24 per gallon for fuel from Turkey.

A spokeswoman for Halliburton, Wendy Hall, defended the company's pricing. "It is expensive to purchase, ship, and deliver fuel into a wartime situation, especially when you are limited by short-duration contracting," she said. She said the company's Kellogg Brown & Root unit, which administers the contract, must work in a "hazardous" and "hostile environment," and that its profit on the contract is small.

The price of fuel sold in Iraq, set by the government, is 5 cents to 15 cents a gallon. The price is a political issue, and has not been raised to avoid another hardship for Iraqis.

....

Nearly $500 million has already been spent to bring gas, benzene and other fuels into Iraq, according to the corps. And as part of the $87 billion package for Iraq and Afghanistan that President Bush signed last month, $18.6 billion will be spent on reconstruction projects, including $690 million for gasoline and other fuel imports in 2004.


Read it and weep
post #2 of 15
Thread Starter 
Pentagon Finds Halliburton Overcharged

By MATT KELLEY, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A Pentagon (news - web sites) investigation has found overcharging and other violations in a $15.6 billion Iraq (news - web sites) reconstruction contract awarded to Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites)'s former company, a defense official said Thursday.

An ongoing audit of Halliburton's Kellogg, Brown & Root subsidiary found substantial overcharging for fuel and other items, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The problems go beyond overcharging, the official said, declining to elaborate.

The Defense Contract Audit Agency has talked with KBR executives during the audit, the official said.

A KBR spokeswoman, Patrice Mingo, did not immediately return telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment.

read the rest
post #3 of 15
This oughta be good...
post #4 of 15
Dumb, dumb, dumb. OK, so at first I bought the WMD line. I figured, hey, US and UK intelligence knows what's up and they have a reason for not laying out all the details to the public. OK, scratch that. We went in to stop Hussein from continuing to plan with Bin Laden. Oh wait, they weren't planning together then, but now they are? OK, scratch that as a reason. Saddam is a brutal dictator who had to be stopped? Fine. I'll buy that. But where's the big threat to the US? Can't the UN handle this? Isn't renewed UN scrutiny the US encouraged after 9-11 enough to deter Saddam from further atrocities? Not with France and Russia taking a hard line against any action with teeth against Iraq with whom they have reportedly been trading in violation of UN sanctions? Are you sure the administration isn't just using this as an excuse to gain a strong foothold in the world's most volitile region, remove an old, weakened enemy, control a large supply of oil, and reward close corporate sponsors with rebuilding contracts?

So, knowing all of these questions are floating out there, the Bush Administration decides to give a huge contract to Haliburton without any competitive bidding. DUMB.

So, knowing the spotlight is on them, the geniuses at Haliburton choose to fudge the numbers and severely overcharge for gas? DUMB.

Whether or not the US was justified or did the right thing in going into Iraq, could the Bush Administration and Haliburton have screwed themselves in the P.R. game any more than they have? DUMB.
post #5 of 15
In all seriousness, well done, Dubya:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...urton_probe_35

IF he sticks to his word here.
post #6 of 15
I can understand a minor miscalculation leading to a discepancy of perhaps 1 or 2 cents, but $1.09 per gallon!

That's simply an astonishing figure.
post #7 of 15
Any chance the govt can sue or charge them an obscene amout of money?
post #8 of 15
This isn't to say that we don't need to get some of these costs recouped, but the New York Times had the following:

The officials said Halliburton did not appear to have profited from overcharging for fuel, but had instead paid a subcontractor too much for the gasoline in the first place.


U.S. Sees Evidence of Overcharging in Iraq Contract


So it was the subcontractor (don't know who it is) who overcharged Halliburton, who overcharged the government, and thus I wouldn't put too much blame on Halliburton.
post #9 of 15
Thread Starter 
Maybe so (I take all information about this situation with a large chunk of salt), but if this is true, we're now seeing the subcontractor in charge of oil overcharging and the sub-contractor in charge of schools doing a sloppy and shameful job. What other horrors will come out of this no bid contract? How can no bid contracts be justified, especially in the case of something with as huge a cost to taxpayers as the reconstruction of Iraq?
post #10 of 15
Well, the US $6.00 per gallon of fuel that I pay at the pump each week to fill my tiny car up highlights the dismal fact that we British are quite capable of teaching Halliburton and friends a thing or two about swindling people...
post #11 of 15
Quote:
Originally posted by AgentOrange: Stainless Steel Rat
Well, the US $6.00 per gallon of fuel that I pay at the pump each week to fill my tiny car up highlights the dismal fact that we British are quite capable of teaching Halliburton and friends a thing or two about swindling people...
Aren't taxes the reason that gas is so expensive everywhere else, or is it that the stations sell it by the litre instead of gallon?
post #12 of 15
Litres are smaller. And it's $.57/litre at the Shell across the street right now if you want to compare.
post #13 of 15
So $.57 Canadian, right? That's like $.35 American - about equal to what it is here. In Japan, it was around 90 yen/litre, so that was around $3.50 a gallon, and when I went to France, it was around .90 euros/litre, or (at the time) $3.50 a gallon. The Canadian prices make me think it's probably taxes instead of the unit size, but it's easier to shrink the package and up the price a little bit. I know random Americans who would go there and say "wow, cheaper than the US!" then when their tank was filled up and they were putting 100 bucks on their credit card they'd wonder what just happened.
post #14 of 15
Gas prices go up and down like a yo-yo here. Three days ago it was at 57.4. Two days ago it was at 68 or so. Last month it got as high as 76. Right this second it's 1/2 cent cheaper than this morning. Alberta rates are generally, but not always, the cheapest in the country. And it seems to get a bit cheaper (a cent or two) the further north you go.

Not that it makes much difference to me. Add 20 cents/litre and a full tank costs me a whopping $4.00 more.
post #15 of 15
Thread Starter 
Halliburton is still there, and will probably not pay dime one back to taxpayers.

In the meantime, here's an interesting piece on a woman who worked as a food safety inspector for KBR's subcontractor at Camp Iron Horse in Tikrit. After observing dangerous food-handling practices (and trying to fix them) and sweatshop-style third world labor exploitation, she was fired one month after arriving.

http://www.northcoastjournal.com/010804/cover0108.html
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Halliburton Continues to Overcharge for Oil