New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Trolls - Page 4  

post #151 of 1623
where`s your proof? btw isn`t name calling grounds for termination?
post #152 of 1623
Plus he was in chat last night as Rigormortis Rob.
post #153 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by Adam Warren
I called-out time flies aka sidney bristow aka fishy kotex ten days ago in the "should we legalize marijuana" thread -- see politics.
Your cookie is in the mail.
post #154 of 1623
don the jeweler
post #155 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by walter-konkrete
don the jeweler
Seconded.
post #156 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by walter-konkrete
don the jeweler
But... but... he posted the Single Greatest First Post I've Ever Read!

Erm, yeah.
post #157 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by My Carob & Son
Holy shit! If that guy gets banned it will be a crime against comedy. He only has three posts, and they are movie related and extremely funny. I cancel out one troll vote.
I disagree. They were easy hits and if he really had an opinion that he wanted to share, he would have posted in the proper threads that I linked to in his posts.

I nominate don the jeweler.
post #158 of 1623
Thread Starter 
Someone please PM me a list of the hated ones that need to go.
post #159 of 1623
Do I honestly even need to mention SubFloor?
post #160 of 1623
nipplering, anyone?
post #161 of 1623
Damn, is school out for the summer already? Hopefully some of these simps have to go to camp this summer...
post #162 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by Shatner's Bassoon
nipplering, anyone?
Yes. I agree.
post #163 of 1623
Welcome to the other side.
post #164 of 1623
No thanks, already glanced at it.

See you on the other side.
post #165 of 1623
Hey, nipplering, I'm sure you'll be back in a day or two...
Any chance of a heads-up on your new sig?
I'm an old fuck and typing gets tiring for me...so how about the firrst 3 letters so I can type-em up now...when I get the rest, I'll tap them in, too...

No, rush, young man...no rush...

These fingers ain't what they used to be...(your mom will tell you the same; ah, bless that whore...)
post #166 of 1623
Sleep tight, nipplering...

(damn, I FINALLY found him after all these years....)
post #167 of 1623
hxpalucard

His post HERE is what caught my eye. Don't know if he's a troll per se, but he's certainly offensive enough.

Edit to add: I don't usually like "telling" on folks for being trolls and such, but troll or not, the guy mentioned above and the guy who started the thread deserve to be kicked for just being absurdly tasteless. That thread just makes me sick. There's nothing funny about it, and it doesn't belong anywhere on this board, IMO.
post #168 of 1623
I'll back up embrodak on hxpalucard and The G.
post #169 of 1623
Jesus Christ... I third embrodak's suggestion.
post #170 of 1623
Fourthed.
post #171 of 1623
Wait, is he a troll or tasteless? Are we now kicking people out for not being funny/having no taste? It would be like a holocaust in here.
post #172 of 1623
Hehe, good point.
post #173 of 1623
I think there is a fine line between someone who is just tasteless and unfunny and what that guy did in that thread. That, to me at least, is just disgusting. There's such a thing as "tasteless" humor that can also be funny. Making fun of a man who was gruesomely executed on camera by terrorists does not fall into that category.
post #174 of 1623
So don't read it? I don't get what's the big deal. Unless he was trolling with that thread - ONLY trying to get negative reactions and work people into a lather - he didn't break any rules.
post #175 of 1623
Quote:
So don't read it?
You could say that about every troll that comes on these boards. If someone gets on your nerves, don't read it. But everyone still reads their stuff, and they still get banned for it. So why do we consider those people to be breaking the rules and the guys I mentioned to be not breaking the rules? They're all just trying to stir up shit. I just don't see how anyone can find that unoffensive, much less funny.
post #176 of 1623
There's no rule here about being offensive, but there is a rule about trying to annoy people and disrupt the board.
post #177 of 1623
Whatever. I personally think that he was trying to disrupt and annoy with that thread, but it's just my opinion. And your entitled to yours. But how the hell could that guy think he was not going to annoy/offend anyone? He had to have done it with that in mind.

And regardless of what you or I think, I couldn't find the thread this morning, so I guess Nick found it disruptive enough to get rid of it.
post #178 of 1623
'Cause you're cool.
post #179 of 1623
Does that make sense?
post #180 of 1623
Because you're a poor excuse for a troll.
post #181 of 1623
That sounds like TROLL talk to me.
post #182 of 1623
Well, to be fair Guest, anybody who disagrees with Sean Bateman's Official Film Declarations of Quality will start a flame war.
post #183 of 1623
galastore

Cancer shill. DVD and Culture forums (at least) shilling cigarettes.
post #184 of 1623
post #185 of 1623
post #186 of 1623
Thread Starter 
Alright, who else needs to get the heave-ho?
post #187 of 1623
Hey, my humor isn't up there with "What does devin eat" threads where pictures of shit are posted, but I try my best.
post #188 of 1623
... a thread which was placed OFF these boards for our own simplistic amusement.
post #189 of 1623
So being a pussy and making fun of me behind my back is better than me doing it to your face, such as it is. Gotcha.
post #190 of 1623
Well, seeing as how banination would likely have ensued, I felt it was probably wiser to not place it on these boards, since there are enough garbage threads as it is.

But if you'd rather we post petty comments about you here or even at your messageboard, then I guess that's what we'll do in the future.
post #191 of 1623
More of a spammer....

muzzaofoz
post #192 of 1623
nicelady

More like annoyinglady. She has done nothing but bump up those Christian Brando threads that Deborah June created back in April. Since there were several threads in more than one forum, she went around and resurrected them.

Example (scroll to the bottom):
http://chud.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=61705
post #193 of 1623
That's even remotely the same. Which one are you? Orangeboy, walterpill, towelie or georges melies?
post #194 of 1623
Quote:
Originally posted by TBailey
Would the above nonsense be the reason this harmless thread got locked?
I think it has more to do with the fact that the topic at hand is played-out and pointless.
post #195 of 1623
Bye.
post #196 of 1623
He's looking for the Do My Homework forum.
post #197 of 1623
I never started!
post #198 of 1623
The bye was a pointless sendoff from me to someone I deleted previously today (Pumpkin Eater). If I was saying bye to Tbailey, methinks I would've deleted him a little sooner than HOURS after making my bye post.

Of course, I am going to delete him now. Next time you private message someone (on another board, of course), keep it private. Ta.
post #199 of 1623
post #200 of 1623
Brainbug, obviously.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
This thread is locked