CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › A literary journal rejected me
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

A literary journal rejected me

post #1 of 32
Thread Starter 
So this is what I sent them... (btw, the journal is STYLUS)

Way to go, you primative screwheads. It's nice to see that you've dedicated yourself to the pursuit of mediocrity and garbage over pure genius. I'm sure you've got plenty of daring poetry in Stylus this year about flowers and relationships and all that challenging stuff that ugly, middle class, Dave Matthews Band-listening students have to offer. And here I thought to myself, "Hey, maybe Stylus is ready to think outside the box and actually print something daring, brilliant, revolutionary. Hey, maybe they're actually in the business of supporting true art!" And then I realized that Stylus is in the business of shitting on magnificence. Well, fine, Stylus, be that way, continue to be a landfill of half realized ideas and masturbatory fantasies of the sickening, middle ground student body of College Park, Maryland. Clearly you're not ready for something that is so brilliant that after you read, your feces will lament leaving the body of someone touched by true art. Yes, you can sit around with your shitheeled friends that you serve Mint Chiperoo to on your Spring Break job, wearing your Mickey-Mouse-on-one-side-Donald-Duck-on-the-other knee highs, talking about how you picked a solid collection of poems that will enter the brain of the reader and fall flat like Ted Kennedy after a night of binge drinking instead of penetrating the mind and soaring like a Phoenix of creativity. I hope you do, I really do. And then you can go home to your loser boyfriends and girlfriends and talk about how you made a difference in the literary world by publishing a series of works that I could replicate by eating Alpha Bits and crapping them out while reading the blank concrete, which would be more fulfilling than an issue of Stylus. I assume this would be followed by lame sex, because people who don't know good literature are SHITTY LAYS!

I hope you all have heart attacks while reading a fourth tier Stephen King novella. Either that, or you choke on the crow you will eat when I reinvent the literary world.

-Gabe
post #2 of 32
Way to make a good impression. At the very least, you have guaranteed that they will never even open another submission from you. And you do realize that lots of editors correspond with one another and/or move to different publishers, so who knows how many bridges you just burned.

I don't mean it as an insult. FTR, though I've published a dozen storys, several articles, and had two plays produced, the stack of rejection letters I've gathered over the last 10 years is beginning to overflow from a manuscript box. But, however much they can hurt, rejections are almost never personal.

Unless of course your post is a joke, in which case: well played.
post #3 of 32
The people who make it the farthest in life are those that handle rejection well. You're not one of them.

Just consider this a learning experience and keep writing. That's all you can do.
post #4 of 32
something else to remember is that as much as we like to hate the publisher/editor/producer who rejected something we wrote sometimes they know what they are talking about.
post #5 of 32
wishing people heart attacks is never cool, 'funk.
post #6 of 32
That ranks up here with me telling the manager of a prominent Memphis television station to go fuck himself in front of his kids.

Sometimes, we should calm down before going off on people.
post #7 of 32
I think opening with an "Army of Darkness" reference may have impacted your credibility just a bit, as did everything that followed.
post #8 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by slowpulse
wishing people heart attacks is never cool, 'funk.
But smoking is!

This is like one of those classic sitcom scenarios where the dad sends his boss an angry letter and then spends the rest of the episode trying to get the letter back. I think the Honeymooners did it first, and it was no doubt thusly ripped off by the Flintstones.

Only the Flintstones probably had more rock imagery in the letter.
post #9 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by Anderson
That ranks up here with me telling the manager of a prominent Memphis television station to go fuck himself in front of his kids.

Sometimes, we should calm down before going off on people.
Uh-oh. Another TV guy. Are you still in the business?
post #10 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by misfit
I think opening with an "Army of Darkness" reference may have impacted your credibility just a bit, as did everything that followed.
That's a given, but the worse part is what being quoted in that rant does to ARMY OF DARKNESS's credibility
post #11 of 32
Sam Raimi must be rolling over in his grave.
post #12 of 32
Just to add my two cents, poems about relationships are not just the stuff of "ugly, middle class, Dave Matthews Band-listening students." Some of the greatest poetry ever put to paper is on this very subject. Poetry doesn't have to be muddled and impossibly obscure to be appreciated. That is all.
post #13 of 32
Great letter. But, as the others have said, if you sent this to Stylus, you probably put your foot in your mouth.

If they pissed you off that bad, don't even send a response letter.
post #14 of 32

Re: A literary journal rejected me

Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
I assume this would be followed by lame sex, because people who don't know good literature are SHITTY LAYS!
A well-read woman is very sexy to me, but after reading this letter, I don't think you have the potential to "reinvent" the literary world. After all, this letter was whiny, and you didn't once give them an example of the great art they'll be missing out on. In short, your return letter should've been creative and not felt like a vulgarity from TV Land.
post #15 of 32
I hope fabfunk isn't being facetious. His delusion shows promise.
post #16 of 32
Plus, if you find yourself in a position where you feel the need to do something this stupid and drastic, keep it short and sweet. It's a little more effective, as long as you want to keep a life in retail.
post #17 of 32

Re: A literary journal rejected me

Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
Yes, you can sit around with your shitheeled friends that you serve Mint Chiperoo to on your Spring Break job, wearing your Mickey-Mouse-on-one-side-Donald-Duck-on-the-other knee highs, talking about how you picked a solid collection of poems that will enter the brain of the reader and fall flat like Ted Kennedy after a night of binge drinking instead of penetrating the mind and soaring like a Phoenix of creativity.
that sentence scares even the likes of me, you should post your "poem" here and let us decide, i'm sure it's fine, and besides, your only ten, you've got your whole life ahead of you...
post #18 of 32

Re: A literary journal rejected me

Let's focus on the bigger issue here: Fabfunk may be a moron and a shitty writer, but

Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
shitting on magnificence.
would be a great name for a band.
post #19 of 32

Re: Re: A literary journal rejected me

I've been writing heavily for seven years, and sending my stuff out for almost five.

I've been rejected from twenty-five lit. mags and publications so far.

I've been published in two.

My advice to you? If you're serious about being a writer, get used to it. And don't be so snotty next time.
post #20 of 32
Thread Starter 
For the record, I wasn't that mad. I'm also friends with the editor. So... I wasn't serious, if that's what any of you thought.
post #21 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
For the record, I wasn't that mad. I'm also friends with the editor. So... I wasn't serious, if that's what any of you thought.
And so the point of this thread is...what?
post #22 of 32

Re: A literary journal rejected me

Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
primative
Whoopsie daisy.

...and yeah, post your submission that they defecated upon. We are a far better judge of art than any (pft) literary magazine.
post #23 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan Whitehead
And so the point of this thread is...what?








































candy gram?
post #24 of 32
You were funnier when you were stalking pornstars.
post #25 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
For the record, I wasn't that mad. I'm also friends with the editor. So... I wasn't serious, if that's what any of you thought.
Whew!
That's a load off my mind.
post #26 of 32
If you're looking to break into comedic writing, fabfunk, I foresee more disappointment ahead.
post #27 of 32

Re: A literary journal rejected me

Quote:
Originally posted by fabfunk
your Spring Break job, wearing your Mickey-Mouse-on-one-side-Donald-Duck-on-the-other knee highs
I'm guessing a House of 1000 Corpses reference helps even less than the Army of Darkness one.
post #28 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by BobClark
Whew!
That's a load off my mind.
Well, then you should worry about the load I'm about to bust on your head!
post #29 of 32
Thread Starter 
damn, I thought I was a dipshit.
post #30 of 32
Quote:
Originally posted by Rex Hudler
If you're looking to break into comedic writing, fabfunk, I foresee more disappointment ahead.
Byron Allen buys one joke off of you, and suddenly you're Alan King.
post #31 of 32
It could very well be that fabfunk intended for his post to be so ill-recieved here on the forums.

It could very well be.
post #32 of 32
im confused...but then again thats not hard to do.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › A literary journal rejected me