CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or vice versa? Discuss.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or vice versa? Discuss.

post #1 of 21
5/19/04 at 7:02pm
Thread Starter 
Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or is Natalie Portman the poor man's Keira Knightley.

I had an argument with someone about this the other day, I go with the former rather than the latter. Or I would offer up that Natalie Portman is the thinking man's Keira Knightley.
Reply
post #2 of 21
5/19/04 at 7:24pm
you lost me at 'thinking man' in regard to either.
Reply
post #3 of 21
5/19/04 at 9:33pm

Re: Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or vice versa? Discuss.

Quote:
Originally posted by jujubes78
Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or is Natalie Portman the poor man's Keira Knightley.

I had an argument with someone about this the other day, I go with the former rather than the latter. Or I would offer up that Natalie Portman is the thinking man's Keira Knightley.
No no no. Portman is the swarthy man's Kiera Knightley.

*Ducks*
Reply
post #4 of 21
5/19/04 at 9:53pm
One has tits, the other doesn't.

They both make shitty movies, though.
Reply
post #5 of 21
5/20/04 at 1:35am
And both are richer than all of you combined.

Nyeahhh...
Reply
post #6 of 21
5/20/04 at 1:54am
Bah. Both are cute, but neither even come close to the talent or beauty that is Anna Paquin.
Reply
post #7 of 21
5/20/04 at 2:21am
I prefer Portman after seeing her in AOTC. She's on the up and up, methinks.
Reply
post #8 of 21
5/20/04 at 5:54am
They're both Poor Men's Rose Byrne's...
Reply
post #9 of 21
5/20/04 at 8:41am
Portman = Hot

Knightly = Not (I like my women to have tits and not look like boys.)
Reply
post #10 of 21
5/20/04 at 9:51am
I find Knightley's underbite sexy.

Portman (to me) is too young-looking. I can't see past Mathilda.

I suspect that neither would have much interest in a poor man.
Reply
post #11 of 21
5/20/04 at 10:26am
I saw a need and I met it.

Reply
post #12 of 21
5/20/04 at 10:33am
Portman seems to air off a sense of old school movie high-class (Hepburn-esque) whereas Knightley is just there, looking all nice for the camera. I appreciate both of them, though.

I've always preferred Portman and will continue to do so.
Reply
post #13 of 21
5/20/04 at 11:20am
Who are two girls who have never been in my kitchen.
Reply
post #14 of 21
5/20/04 at 11:42am
Quote:
Originally posted by Colin Farrell v.2.0
I saw a need and I met it.
I wouldn't mind being part of their sandwich. Other than
that...how can one forget the volumptousness of Christina
Ricci? She's got a nice set of ta-tas and a juicy ass!

Oh wait, are we talking about acting skills?
Reply
post #15 of 21
5/20/04 at 11:56am
Keira Knightly is the sexiest tomboy beanpole on the planet.
Reply
post #16 of 21
5/20/04 at 8:32pm
Quote:
Originally posted by L7 Productions
Portman seems to air off a sense of old school movie high-class (Hepburn-esque) whereas Knightley is just there, looking all nice for the camera. I appreciate both of them, though.
I think that's because she gives off an air of being bitchy and full of herself. I hear that's not far off from reality, but then I've never met her so it's merely gossip.

Knightley, despite the English accent, generally seems pretty cool.
Reply
post #17 of 21
5/22/04 at 3:59pm
I think after Garden State, all of you will fall in love with Natalie Portman
Reply
post #18 of 21
5/23/04 at 2:10am
I doubt that. I go for women, not girls...
Reply
post #19 of 21
5/23/04 at 2:21am
I'd go with Knightley. Nicer face, nicer body....
I must have missed the part where Portman grew gigantic breasts. The two seem to have the same type of chest.

Boob 1:
http://www.youngluvmovies.com/keira-...aked-2_001.jpg

Boob 2:
http://www.celebcrush.com/natalie/5.jpg

Not much of a difference.
Reply
post #20 of 21
5/23/04 at 2:39pm
Quote:
Originally posted by wadew1
[B]I'd go with Knightley. Nicer face, nicer body....
]
So, ah, you like the bones with skin on them? Anorexia fetish?
Reply
post #21 of 21
5/23/04 at 3:18pm
Quote:
Originally posted by Brendan
So, ah, you like the bones with skin on them? Anorexia fetish?
And Portman on the other hand is filled out? There's probably a 2 pound difference between them. Knightley just looks like she's done a couple of more situps .
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gossip
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Gossip › Is Keira Knightley the poor man's Natalie Portman, or vice versa? Discuss.