Quote:
|
Originally Posted by flyarz
Oh, I'm not saying that apathetic Florida fans are the problem. I do think that they aren't the greatest sports fans in the world, but I know that's hardly the reason that a lot of their teams draw poorly. I just think many of their teams in sports (the Devil Rays, Lightning, Marlins, Panthers, etc.) are the result of poorly planned expansion from their respective leagues. You just listed many of the problems that the Marlins have in drawing well, which makes me wonder why a CHUD member can point out those mistakes and the MLB can't.
So that probably means that ownership is making a killing. Because, really, there cannot be another explanation.
|
The reason why the Marlins exist at all is because MLB wanted a franchise in the 13th largest market, and despite not having a stadium deal, Huizenga provided both the expansion start-up cash, and a temporary stadium solution by converting the Dolphins stadium for baseball. That year, the Yankees and Orioles played an exhibition game at Pro Player (then known as Joe Robbie Stadium) as an experiment, and the fan response was great. The idea was for it to be a temporary solution, to give the Marlins time to get their own publically funded ballpark.
Unfortunately, neither Huizenga nor MLB counted on getting stonewalled by the city and state. The Panthers were brought into town under similar circumstances, and they used their Stanley Cup run in '96 to get their own place, but it's also in the middle of nowhere, since the city of Sunrise were the only idiots to buy them what is now the Office Depot Center. The Heat pulled off a PR miracle, since they had the Miami Arena built for them in the late 80's, even though the design was considered outdated even before it opened. Thanks to a confusingly worded voter referendum (where "NO" meant "YES"), and a whole lot of political ads, the Heat managed to get a brand spanking new arena by the bay, a few blocks away from the old Arena. The Marlins have yet to introduce the issue as a voter referendum, instead relying on city and county commissions, with little success.
To make matters worse, Pro Player was considered a success story (despite the location), because the original owner Joe Robbie paid for it entirely with private financing. Huizenga was the billionaire founder of Blockbuster Video, and he owned the Dolphins, the Marlins, the Panthers, Pro Player Stadium (bought from Joe Robbie's heirs), and the local Sportschannel network that owned the Marlins and Panthers TV rights. Nobody wanted to give him the money for a new park, and despite raising the payroll in '97 and winning the Series, the local politicians stood their ground, so he dismantled the team.
The guy he sold it to, John Henry (billionaire commodities trader), promised to privately build a new stadium in downtown Miami if he couldn't get public help, with the disclaimer that the team would have to play with a reduced payroll to cover the expenses. After a few years of legislative inaction, the bastard goes back on his word, and colludes with his pal Bud Selig to illegally buy the Red Sox (despite a rival group's higher bidding price), while Selig dumped the Marlins to transplanted Expos owner, Jeff Loria.
Just for the record, I didn't know who to root for in last year's AL Game 7 playoff. As good as it felt to play (and beat!) the Yankees in last year's series, it would've been equally satisfying to have a chance to rip on the Red Sox. Down here, we actually hate John Henry more than Steinbrenner.
Even after ownership has changed hands a couple of times, and another championship, the apathy towards a publically financed stadium is not as strong as before, but it won't die easily, especially after the Miami Arena/AAA fiasco.
As for me.....as much as I'd love to see the Marlins play in a baseball-only park overlooking the bay, I don't want to see taxpayers stuck with the bill.