I was looking at the old DVD and I found the following review.
Which I could give 0 stars, July 5, 2004
Reviewer: John (Montclair, VA USA) - See all my reviews
This is the worst movie I have ever seen. Followed closely behind by Night of the Living Dead. The zombies all look like crap. They grey skin makes a very unrealistic zombie. The boring movement of the zombies forces the viewer to fall asleep before they even get to the mall.
I think the characters overreact a little. Steven walks straight up to the zombie and gets ready to shoot. Turns out he waisted all his bullets shooting at nothing. That's right. NOTHING. Once he realizes this, he throws his hands in the air and runs off like a scared little girl running for him mommy. Why not just knock the zombie down? It's not like it's going to run at him.
"Martinez! We think what you're up to is more important than this zombie problem. Come out now, or we'll go in there and let one of our guys go crazy." Martinez was evil. Worst than the plague of zombies.
Another thing. Where was the military in all this. This is something they would get involved with. I was happy to see the military was doing something to stop this zombie plague during the New Dawn. Not like Romero's movie. Why wasn't the military doing anything in Romero's movie? Because they can handle a bunch of slow, boring zombies.
People say that the new Dawn does not have an explanation for the zombies. Neither did this movie. In Night of the Living Dead they thought it was radiation from a sattelite that caused the mutations. They didn't confirm that. In Dawn of the Dead (1978) the people on the Emergency Broadcasting System said they were looking for the answer in the terms of a viral outbreak. That was not confirmed. That means Romero never told the answer. He just gave suggestions, just tlike the New Dawn. Dawn of the Dead (2004) suggested that a virus might be the reason. So people can't use that against the new Dawn.
The acting was just terrible. Roger was the idiot of the group. The guy everyone couldn't wait to get killed. Not only was he trying to get himself killed. He was trying to get Peter killed. What a f*****. Hey Rog. "There are only about ten zombies around you. Why not shoot them all in the head, then get in Peter's truck? Maybe you won't get bit."
The biggest problem the movies has is the incredible amount of boredom it brings. George tried to make it scary. He did a poor job. George Romero isn't some great director who makes perfect movies. His movies sucked as much as House of the Dead did.
If Romero's fourth dead film is not as good as the remake of Dawn, then everyone can shut up about Romero being some kind of great director. Romero sucks.
George Romero comes out of no where with a 35mm camera, does zombies in his own style, and tells everyone that zombies must be done like this from now on. What a jerk. How dare he try to tell people what to do. I can do zombies the way I want to. Get out of my way George.
I don't know what Romero's trying to say with this movie, but it doesn't get through to the viewer who is already sleeping because of the boredom. What good would millions of dollars do a gang of bikers in the middle of a world where everyone is dead. They got the money, but now they have nothing to spend it on. Everyone's a zombie because the military didn't take action. Stupid military. Why didn't they do anything about this?
The news man with an eye-patch claims that zombies are motorized instinct. If that's true, then why do they use tools. Your instincts don't tell you to grab coins out of the fountain. They don't tell you to wave a hockey stick around. Why do they do it?
Now the biggest question of all. WHY ARE ZOMBIES AFRAID OF FIRE? ZOMBIES ARE AFRAIDE OF FIRE, BUT THEY ARN'T AFRAID OF A GUN POINTED STRAIGHT AT THEIR HEADS. ZOMBIES KNOW WHAT FIRE WILL DO TO THEM, BUT THEY DON"T KNOW WHAT A GUN WILL DO TO THEM. Sounds to me like Romero just needed to find an answer. Romero never told anyone why zombies are afraid of fire. Just like they never told why zombies don't eat dogs in the new Dawn.
People say that the fast-moving zombies arn't intimidating. Neither are the slow ones. Maybe the character in the movie was afraid of a zombie 100 feet away from him, but I wasn't scared at all. I was bored.
WHY DO ZOMBIES HAVE SUCH STRONG ARMS BUT SUCH WEAK LEGS. ROMERO HAS ESTABLISHED THE FACT THAT ZOMBIES CAN FORCE A PERSON TO A WALL. IS HE TRYING TO TELL US THAT SLOW MOVING ZOMBIES ARE STRONG ENOUGH TO FORCE SOMEONE ON THE GROUND? They can pin people to a wall, but they can't run. They say god doesn't give you two hands and they were right. Got the upper body strength, but no the lower boddy strength. That's hard to believe.
Anyone who tells you that this movie is better than the remake is full of sh**. The remake beats this movie in every way possible. What good is character developement when the idiots are the ones to die. The two make it out alive. Nice ending Romero. Dawn of the Dead (2004) had the best ending to a movie ever. They all died. That's great. Hardly anyone is brave enough to do that in a movie. It's more realistic than Romero's ending, where they flyi away and you don't know what happens to them.
I give this movie 0/5 stars 0/10 stars 0/15 stars 0/100 stars 1/1000 stars.
I sawn this movie March 14, 2004. 6 days before I saw the remake.