Well, i just finished.
Hoo...what a ride.
I'd like to talk about the book, and the series as a whole...if anyone else is up for it. There's a lot to chew on, especially given the audacious ending.
If you havent finished/started the seventh book, don't read further. Forgive the jumble of thoughts, but I'm writing as they come:
The ending blew me away. While King continues to frustrate in terms of knowing how to wrap up his own books, and in terms of having his villians built up and built up, only to bring them down too suddenly, and too easily (the trend continues with the narrative thrust deflating Patrick Danville and his amazing disappearing Crimson King trick), I thought the real ending, the one beyond the cozy hearts n' flowers reuniting of Susannah, Jake and Eddie, was a cracker.
What is King saying here? Why is Roland doomed to repeat his quest? Why is there deliberately less a chance of redemption for him, given that he's only turned back into the desert each time he wins the tower?
Mordred was a gruesomely realized villian that almost fell prey to King's "kill the monstrous fiend with a magic peanut brittle snake cannister" tendencies, saved (in my exceedingly ordinary opinion) only by the amount of love we'd invested in the character of Oy, and Roland's guns.
I was heartbroken by Eddie's senseless, sudden shooting. Less so by Jake's swift demise, possibly because it came barelling in on the heels of the first death. I was shocked by how quickly King swept them both from the board.
I confess to some disappointment, as well, because Susannah has always been my least favorite of the Ka tet. While she's had a terrific character arc, and Drawing of the Three used her incredibly well, I'm just less taken with her. I think, honestly, that I'd have been even more emotionally affected had she been the one to be shot, with Eddie grieving and following Roland, only to be reunited with Jake and his love on that strange alternate New York. Which raises another question: if Roland is condemned to repeat this loop endlessly, does that mean that Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oy are also suffering the same fate? If so, are they different Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oys each time, from a different when? Or is it the same Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oy? THe book seems to say the latter, because Roland's quest would not repeat the same way each time without the specific knowledge each had of their worlds. Such knowledge helps them out on their quest (Eddie's riddling, for instance). If that's the case, the tower seems even less of a positive force, and becomes almost malevolent.
What else?
Was Dandelo supposed to be IT? At one point, King writes that the old man's face looked like a psychotic clown, and it ends up transforming into an insect, which I think Pennywise did at the end of IT, though the memory i'm coming up with is of John Ritter and Harry Anderson fighting a giant ant underground. So, the book might be different.
I liked Roland's encounter with the middle aged woman, and thought it played out naturally and sweetly. Also, a whole Zahn style spin off series could be written on the intrigues and happenings in the Tet corporation. That whole concept was very nice, and well executed.
In short....the very ending capped the series perfectly, I think. It's ambiguous, frightening, and mystical in a way that allows the taking of the tower not to be a let down. That was a huge relief for me, and I'm glad King was ballsy enough to go there. Had the book ended any earlier (with Roland defeating the CK like an etch a sketch and disappearing into the tower, or with the Susannah feel good chapter) I would have been more than a little disappointed. As it is, i'm almost totally satisfied, with a nagging voice saying that the CK could and should have been a little more thought out, and at least partially threatening, for the book to have acheived true greatness.
As it is, he's a crazy old guy in red who throws evil harry potter bombs.
Hoo...what a ride.
I'd like to talk about the book, and the series as a whole...if anyone else is up for it. There's a lot to chew on, especially given the audacious ending.
If you havent finished/started the seventh book, don't read further. Forgive the jumble of thoughts, but I'm writing as they come:
The ending blew me away. While King continues to frustrate in terms of knowing how to wrap up his own books, and in terms of having his villians built up and built up, only to bring them down too suddenly, and too easily (the trend continues with the narrative thrust deflating Patrick Danville and his amazing disappearing Crimson King trick), I thought the real ending, the one beyond the cozy hearts n' flowers reuniting of Susannah, Jake and Eddie, was a cracker.
What is King saying here? Why is Roland doomed to repeat his quest? Why is there deliberately less a chance of redemption for him, given that he's only turned back into the desert each time he wins the tower?
Mordred was a gruesomely realized villian that almost fell prey to King's "kill the monstrous fiend with a magic peanut brittle snake cannister" tendencies, saved (in my exceedingly ordinary opinion) only by the amount of love we'd invested in the character of Oy, and Roland's guns.
I was heartbroken by Eddie's senseless, sudden shooting. Less so by Jake's swift demise, possibly because it came barelling in on the heels of the first death. I was shocked by how quickly King swept them both from the board.
I confess to some disappointment, as well, because Susannah has always been my least favorite of the Ka tet. While she's had a terrific character arc, and Drawing of the Three used her incredibly well, I'm just less taken with her. I think, honestly, that I'd have been even more emotionally affected had she been the one to be shot, with Eddie grieving and following Roland, only to be reunited with Jake and his love on that strange alternate New York. Which raises another question: if Roland is condemned to repeat this loop endlessly, does that mean that Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oy are also suffering the same fate? If so, are they different Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oys each time, from a different when? Or is it the same Eddie, Susannah, Jake and Oy? THe book seems to say the latter, because Roland's quest would not repeat the same way each time without the specific knowledge each had of their worlds. Such knowledge helps them out on their quest (Eddie's riddling, for instance). If that's the case, the tower seems even less of a positive force, and becomes almost malevolent.
What else?
Was Dandelo supposed to be IT? At one point, King writes that the old man's face looked like a psychotic clown, and it ends up transforming into an insect, which I think Pennywise did at the end of IT, though the memory i'm coming up with is of John Ritter and Harry Anderson fighting a giant ant underground. So, the book might be different.
I liked Roland's encounter with the middle aged woman, and thought it played out naturally and sweetly. Also, a whole Zahn style spin off series could be written on the intrigues and happenings in the Tet corporation. That whole concept was very nice, and well executed.
In short....the very ending capped the series perfectly, I think. It's ambiguous, frightening, and mystical in a way that allows the taking of the tower not to be a let down. That was a huge relief for me, and I'm glad King was ballsy enough to go there. Had the book ended any earlier (with Roland defeating the CK like an etch a sketch and disappearing into the tower, or with the Susannah feel good chapter) I would have been more than a little disappointed. As it is, i'm almost totally satisfied, with a nagging voice saying that the CK could and should have been a little more thought out, and at least partially threatening, for the book to have acheived true greatness.
As it is, he's a crazy old guy in red who throws evil harry potter bombs.


