CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Republicans in Congress just 0.0003% close to defaulting on federal debt
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Republicans in Congress just 0.0003% close to defaulting on federal debt

post #1 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reuters.com

WASHINGTON, Nov 15 - The U.S. Treasury Department on Monday postponed announcing a four-week bill auction to avoid piercing the limit on federal borrowing, and said Congress needed to raise the statutory debt ceiling this week.

The offering delay had been expected after Treasury last week said it had no authority to issue the bills that would have settled on Thursday, the day extraordinary measures used to skirt the debt limit are set to run out.

The Treasury Department said it was in talks with the House of Representatives and the Senate on the issue, and said it was essential lawmakers act as soon as possible to lift the limit.

"It would be unthinkable that Congress did not pass the debt limit legislation," Treasury spokesman Rob Nichols told a press briefing. "I believe we have made clear the critical importance of Congress acting on the debt limit."

Since early October, the Treasury Department has been hovering near its $7.384 trillion limit on federal borrowing. It has alerted Congress that accounting maneuvers to keep the U.S. below its debt ceiling would run out on Thursday.

The most recent Treasury data showed U.S. debt subject to limit at $7,383,975,000,000 -- just $25 million or 0.0003 percent below the debt limit.

Failure to raise the limit could lead to a government default on the debt its borrows, but Congress has never allowed this to happen.


Lawmakers are expected to vote before Thursday to increase the debt ceiling, possibly by as much as $800 billion, a Senate aide said. The aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a Senate vote on increasing the limit could come before noon on Wednesday.

The House of Representatives would then need to vote on the bill passed by the Senate for the increase to take effect. House speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, said he was keen to get the move out of the way.

"Whatever we get done is fine. Just get it done," he said.

The Republican-led Congress avoided increasing the borrowing limit before the Nov. 2 election as leaders did not want to have the politically sensitive vote.

Democrats, who have been pushing hard for a stand-alone vote on the debt limit, will likely use the debate to attack President George W. Bush's economic policies, which they say have turned the fiscal surplus he inherited into a record deficit.

Some Republicans wanted to tack the debt limit measure on to a huge spending package encompassing remaining unpassed spending bills for the 2005 fiscal year that lawmakers are working on. But other Republicans fear that could complicate the already tricky spending discussions.

Hastert said it "makes the bigger bills harder to pass" if they have extras stuck on to them.

Also, it is not clear whether the omnibus bill will be ready for congressional approval before Thursday.

Treasury's Nichols said the department would make decisions day-to-day on further emergency measures required to keep the government's financing below the statutory limit ahead of the Thursday deadline.

"As we are running up to that date, we are taking the prudent steps to protect the full faith and credit of the U.S. government," he said. "We are continuing to take those steps."
source (even though I posted the whole article)

These filthy Republicans are NOT conservative with "our" money, and are acting like a bunch of pigs at the trough. Piping it into corporations, without much regard for how these companies are helping (or in many cases, not helping) the public.
post #2 of 32
But they're protecting us from liberals banning the Bible and forcing the homosexual agenda down our throats. They're our only hope.
post #3 of 32
This is what I call a fiscal conservative administration!
post #4 of 32
Do you think the people who know Maus in real life hate him too?
post #5 of 32
How do you make butt babies?
post #6 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maus
"But they am protecting right to slaughter unborn and make butt babies. Am important!!!"

-Bizarro Micah
Huh?
post #7 of 32
"I'm going to follow the lead of Jesus and be a decent human being for once in my miserable life"

Bizarro Maus
post #8 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club
How do you make butt babies?

I think I saw those at Toys 'r' Us last week.
post #9 of 32
What is about arch-CHUDservatives today? Grifter turns into a Grand Dragon, Maus starts talking about butt babies, then they both try to pass it off as jokes...

Is fragile facade of sanity finally crumbling?
post #10 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guttenberg Fan Club
"I'm going to follow the lead of Jesus and be a decent human being for once in my miserable life"

Bizarro Maus
"I'm going to make sense for once in my life. Also, FREE DVDS!"

Bizarro Maus
post #11 of 32
This thread is great.

Anyway, it's nice that the new Congress is getting off to a great start. There's this fiasco and they're also going back on their plan to enforce Country of Origin labelling on all meat products. Hooray!
post #12 of 32
"If I'm going to call people names, maybe I should suck it up a bit when people say bad things about me..."

Bizarro Maus
post #13 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah Robinson
What is about arch-CHUDservatives today? Grifter turns into a Grand Dragon, Maus starts talking about butt babies, then they both try to pass it off as jokes...

Is fragile facade of sanity finally crumbling?
I think you're supposed to laugh.
post #14 of 32
I think humorous material is a pre-requisite for me to do that.
post #15 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah Robinson
Is fragile facade of sanity finally crumbling?
I've noted myself how close mine is to completely crumbling of late. Perhaps these are the tremors?

Just been a fucked up day.

By the way, I was, in fact, WAY out line in trying to make a point. I apologize Micah. That was not cool.
post #16 of 32
"I've never wanted to be fucked in the ass"

Bizarro Maus
post #17 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale 'Grifter' Wicker
By the way, I was, in fact, WAY out line in trying to make a point. I apologize Micah. That was not cool.
Apology accepted.
post #18 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maus
Oh, Guttenberg, stop being such a vagina. I was joking.
You also don't seem to know what Bizarro indicates, your "joke" didn't make any sense at all.
post #19 of 32
You guys make it seem like the Republicans want the system to collapse. Even if they are the avaricious, money hording, corporate sell out sons of bitches you make them out to be; even if that is the case, they still require the system to function in order for any of it to be worthwhile to them. Whether their decisions ultimately turn out for good or bad, you cannot possibly think they're stupid enough not to realize that, can you?
post #20 of 32
...


"Man I should post more with this great discourse going on"
- Bizarro Dellamorte
post #21 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL
You guys make it seem like the Republicans want the system to collapse. Even if they are the avaricious, money hording, corporate sell out sons of bitches you make them out to be; even if that is the case, they still require the system to function in order for any of it to be worthwhile to them. Whether their decisions ultimately turn out for good or bad, you cannot possibly think they're stupid enough not to realize that, can you?
I have very little doubt they will raise the debt limit.... this time.
post #22 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by JuddL
You guys make it seem like the Republicans want the system to collapse. Even if they are the avaricious, money hording, corporate sell out sons of bitches you make them out to be; even if that is the case, they still require the system to function in order for any of it to be worthwhile to them. Whether their decisions ultimately turn out for good or bad, you cannot possibly think they're stupid enough not to realize that, can you?
Isn't it an avaricious, money hording, corporate sell-out son of a bitch thing to do to bankrupt the government so private corporations can take over public works and continue to push all of the country's resources and wealth into one big pile? If not, I need to update my copy of Guidebook To Being A Successful Avaricious, Money Hording, Corporate Sell-Out Son Of A Bitch.
post #23 of 32
I heard an interesting story about the importance of the National Debt the other day on NPR. They interviewed a guy from the Wall St. Journal who basically said that there is little chance of a financial collapse in the U.S. but that the real problem will come when the first baby boomers start tp retire and apply for social security in 2008 or so. At that point we are fucked.
post #24 of 32
Looks like some of you guys are going to have to start working a lot harder in the future to pay off those suffocating taxes. Forget about Comic Cons, Chewer get-togethers and other such extravagancies. By the time those Republicans have finished clawing back what they’ve spent you won't have enough money left for the matinee showing. <grin>
post #25 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentOrange
Looks like some of you guys are going to have to start working a lot harder in the future to pay off those suffocating taxes. Forget about Comic Cons, Chewer get-togethers and other such extravagancies. By the time those Republicans have finished clawing back what they’ve spent you won't have enough money left for the matinee showing. <grin>
Hey, dollar theatres are okay by me! If I have to skip a few new movies every now and then to pay my community college tuition, I will. I'm the future of this country, you know!
post #26 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Key Chung
source (even though I posted the whole article)

These filthy Republicans are NOT conservative with "our" money, and are acting like a bunch of pigs at the trough. Piping it into corporations, without much regard for how these companies are helping (or in many cases, not helping) the public.
Yeah, it's a problem that hopefully (as in, it won't happen with either party) we will be able to take care of, or at least alleviate.
post #27 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorro
Yeah, it's a problem that hopefully (as in, it won't happen with either party) we will be able to take care of, or at least alleviate.
Yes, by endorsing the most fiscally wasteful Republican president wholeheartedly. Good first step, there...
post #28 of 32
Sorry, but you're boring the pants off me. Bye.
post #29 of 32
Do we still have to look at that picture when the guy is banned? It reminds me of young Tommy from Pod People, and that ain't a good thing.
post #30 of 32
Pardon my ignorance, but if we do hit the national debt limit, what does it mean that it would 'default?'

What ungodly thing would happen?
post #31 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormin
Pardon my ignorance, but if we do hit the national debt limit, what does it mean that it would 'default?'

What ungodly thing would happen?
When a business defaults on its debt, it generally either declares bankruptcy voluntarily in court, or its creditors have it declared bankrupt by a court. Bankruptcy law varies from country to country, but the purpose of placing the issue in the hands of the legal system is to give creditors a chance to recoup some of the money they are owed, and to allow businesses an opportunity to try to reorganize and get back on their feet. The court in different ways will oversee the process of rescheduling debt payments, restructuring the debts, or reorganizing the business.

To date, there has been no coordinated international system for dealing with sovereign defaults. Countries that can not pay their debts try to have them rescheduled, or try to negotiate a write-down, or reduction, of the total amount of debt. The majority of negotiations and workouts have historically been done on an ad-hoc basis between creditors and the government. To renegotiate official debts, or the money owed by one country to another, debtor nations have to deal with the so-called Paris Club, a group of rich creditor nations. To renegotiate commercial debt, or money owed to private creditors, such as banks, countries have to deal with a group known as the London Club.

In some cases, where a country appears to be rapidly approaching a default, or the size of the debt owed means a default could disrupt the financial markets and the stability of the country itself, the International Monetary Fund may step in. The multilateral institution has in the past made emergency loans to help countries in such situations, in a move often referred to as a bailout.

The IMF doesn’t help all countries that default. For instance, in 1999 Ecuador defaulted on $6 billion in Brady bonds, with no help from the IMF. But it does have a history of paying big money to help others. So far it has paid out some $250 billion. The IMF has been heavily criticized for its long track record of bailouts that have failed to show discernable long-term benefits, or even failed in their immediate objective of stabilizing the exchange rate, as happened in East Asia in 1997, Russia in 1998, and Brazil, in 1999. Indeed, IMF critics contend bailouts typically prolong and exacerbate economic problems, especially for lower-income nations, because a bailout is just another set of loans to add to their debt burden. You can read more about debt relief and HIPC here.

A persistent criticism of bailouts has also been the moral hazard problem, where the lender loans money carelessly, knowing that if things go wrong, there is a good chance of a bail-out. This excessive lending, critics claim, has played an important role in bringing on some of the recent crises. This was the widely held view in the case of Russia, which defaulted on its debt in 1998. Creditors believed it was “too big to fail,” especially since the West would be worried about instability in a nuclear power; when, in spite of a large bail-out in July, the country defaulted on its loans in August as the ruble collapse, there was a major sell-off in the emerging markets, in response to the recognition of the seeming limits on bail-outs.
post #32 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormin
Pardon my ignorance, but if we do hit the national debt limit, what does it mean that it would 'default?'

What ungodly thing would happen?
We legally couldn't pay our creditors and then all kinds of shitty macro-economic things would happen as a result.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The New York Times
Nov. 17 - Faced with the prospect of a government unable to pay its bills, the Senate voted on Wednesday to raise the federal debt limit by $800 billion.

Though an increase in the debt ceiling was never in doubt, Republican leaders in both houses of Congress postponed action on it last month, until after the elections, to deprive Democrats of a chance to accuse them of fiscal irresponsibility.

The bill, if approved by the House in a vote expected on Thursday, would authorize the third big increase in the federal borrowing since President Bush took office in 2001. Federal debt has ballooned by $1.4 trillion over the past four years, to $7.4 trillion, and the new ceiling would allow borrowing to reach $8.2 trillion.

With no end in sight to the huge annual budget deficits, which hit a record of $412 billion this year, lawmakers predicted on Wednesday that the new ceiling would probably have to be raised again in about a year.


Democrats, still stinging from their election defeats, voted against the measure and argued that it should be accompanied by rules that would force Congress to pay for new tax cuts with spending cuts or tax increases elsewhere.

"I don't remember anyone during the elections making a promise to raise the federal debt to $8.1 trillion," Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota, said. "What we're doing here is just writing another blank check and saying to this administration, 'Go ahead, continue to run record budget deficits.' "

Administration officials have been pleading for an increase in the debt limit since last August, and the Treasury Department has been tapping into Civil Service retirement accounts since Oct. 14 to avoid breaching the limit.

On Tuesday, Treasury Secretary John W. Snow warned that the administration had "exhausted" all the previously used financial maneuvers. The government can probably keep paying bills until early next month, but the Treasury Department would have to postpone an auction of new Treasury securities scheduled for Monday.

Raising the legal borrowing limit has long been more political theater than substantive decision making, because lawmakers ultimately have no choice in the matter if the government is to stay in operation.

The 52-to-44 vote was almost purely along party lines, with one Republican, Senator John Ensign of Nevada, voting against a higher ceiling.

Two Democrats, Senators John B. Breaux of Louisiana and Zell Miller of Georgia, voted in favor of the measure.

Some Republican lawmakers had hoped to bury the measure in a broader spending bill that would attract less attention and that many Democrats would feel compelled to support. But Senate leaders decided to vote on a stand-alone bill in exchange for a commitment from Democrats to limit the debate.

"We've come to a general agreement to move ahead today," Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader, said. "The House literally is waiting for us to act."

In a muted floor debate, Democrats did almost all the talking - all aimed at castigating the administration and its Congressional allies for indulging in "borrow and spend" policies - while Republicans grimly waited for the debate to end and the vote to begin.

Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, in his first appearance on the floor since losing the presidential election, said the growing debt threatened economic security.

"To pay our bills, America now goes cup in hand to nations like China, Korea, Taiwan and Caribbean banking centers," Mr. Kerry said. "Those issues didn't go away on Nov. 3, no matter what the results."

Administration officials contend that the annual deficits are undesirable but necessary to help stimulate an economic recovery and fight a global war on terrorism.

Mr. Bush has promised to reduce the deficit by half over five years, though the administration is fighting to make its tax cuts permanent and may need more than $70 billion in extra money next year to support military operations in Iraq.

House Republicans said they would schedule a vote on the bill for Thursday evening.

"We'll get it done," John Feehry, a spokesman for House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, said. "We have an obligation to keep the government in operation."
I wish every American could raise their credit limit at a whim. Things would be so much better for everybody.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Republicans in Congress just 0.0003% close to defaulting on federal debt