CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Dirty Harry
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dirty Harry

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
There are Chick Flicks and there are Dick Flicks. Dirty Harry is the original modern Dick Flick.

In an era of social upheaval and political scandal, it was time for a man to step up to the plate. An everyman. A blue collar working class joe, pulling down a living as a cop, and trying to do his part to make the world a little better. But how can a man play by the rules when bureacratic red tape frees more criminals than it stops? How can a man play by the rules when the innocent are afforded less rights than the guilty?
Enter Dirty Harry, a true Republican. Wielding his trademark Smith & Wesson, Clint Eastwood's most iconic character fights for justice and the American way, even if he has to break a few rules to do it. Shoot first, ask questions later. Such a policy struck a reactionary nerve in audiences in the 70's. Harry is a wish fullfillment hero. The guy who understands that sometimes a little Marshall Law is what's needed to keep society in order. A guy who knows his own job better than the City Hall fat cats who would tie his hands and allow an unrepentant psycho back on the streets. Who among us wouldn't like to see the Ira Einhorns and OJ's of the world brought down hard? Who among us wouldn't look the other way if Dirty Harry took them out? Don Siegel's hard edged cop flick allows us to indulge such base desires. It gives us our own angel of retribution who will do the dirty work required, the stuff nobody wants on their own conscience.
Still, Siegel keeps Harry from becoming a total psycho. Harry may badger and beat a suspect to get the info on a missing girl, but he never kills in cold blood. Even his final dispatching of the heinous villain is an act of self defense. The villain commits the same fatal error all Dick Flick villians would from then on- drawing on a cop who already has the drop on him.
Dirty Harry is the prototype for nearly every cop Dick Flick that followed. It laid the blueprint that is still followed today in flicks like Bad Boys 2.
All hail Harry Callahan, King of The Dicks.
post #2 of 8
Need I remind you that BULLITT was released in 1968, three years before DIRTY HARRY?

Sure, Frank Bullitt may not be the quipping, psycho-Conservative cop that Harry is (sure, he kills people and breaks the rules but it doesn't make him feel good), but BULLITT is a film guaranteed to put hair on your balls. Dirty Harry is great, but Bullitt came first.
post #3 of 8
Thread Starter 
Good call on Bullitt. I'd say they are different animals, though.
Bullitt is more of a personal vendetta film, while Dirty Harry embraces a larger general principle.
A small distinction, perhaps, but an important one. It's been awhile, but as I recall McQueen wouldn't have turned into such a rule breaker had he not been pushed so hard. And is there evidence that he would stay outside the rules, so to speak, after this case is closed? I might liken Bullitt more to Martin Riggs, the good cop pushed to the edge by personal circumstances.
Harry is hardwired to battle crime on his own terms right from the start. He's more like a force of nature acting on society's behalf.
post #4 of 8
They are two different animals. DH actually being a good flick while Bullit, save for the awesome car chase, is a fucking snooze-fest. Dullsville. Sleepy town. Zzzzzzzzzz.

A better McQueen flick is "The Getaway."

Dirty Harry is a the reason why Eastwood rules this fucking earth! Love this flick to death.

It's ironic you called his character a Republican, maybe a Nixon Republican, but surely not a George Bush the Sequel Republican because we all know he is the farthest thing from being a true Republican. Then again, I don't see Harry as having any political affiliation. I just see a guy with integrity who gets sick of the politics of his job and the criminals getting treated better than the victims. As much as he claims he hates people, he can't stop what Bob said, what he's hardwired to do.
Eastwood's seemly misanthropic attitude comes from him just wanting a better fucking world, yet his job constantly reminds him how awful humanity is towards its own kind. An honorable guy in a dishonorable world.

Love the sequels too.

We need just one more. Team him up with Russel Crowe or a Kurt Russell and let the love begin.
post #5 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Zod
They are two different animals. DH actually being a good flick while Bullit, save for the awesome car chase, is a fucking snooze-fest. Dullsville. Sleepy town. Zzzzzzzzzz.
Really? I thought the movie was pretty taught. That pursuit at the end across the airport runway was very thrilling, and it's downbeat ending helped make the whole film much more thought-provoking than the usual crime drama.
post #6 of 8
Not to mention Lalo Schifrin delivered scores for both Bullitt and Dirty Harry. I prefer his DH score.

Harry's entrance is just so fucking cool. Schifrin's music kicks in and Harry tilts his head at the crime, for some reason, everytime I see that scene I think how fucking badass he is.

"Anybody can tell that wasn't me"

'Oh yeah, how's that?"

"He looks too damn good, that's why"

The armed robbery scene still kicks ass.
post #7 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Werbal_Kint
Really? I thought the movie was pretty taught. That pursuit at the end across the airport runway was very thrilling, and it's downbeat ending helped make the whole film much more thought-provoking than the usual crime drama.
Never got any out of it.

Harry Callahan eats up every scene he's in. Frank Bullit was just there. I still say its McQueen's weakest and vastly overrated performances. Hell, even "The Hunter" is a superior flick.
post #8 of 8
And for the best Siegel/McQueen team-up, check out Hell is for Heroes. That'll show you what a great actor McQueen was.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Dirty Harry