Quote:
| Other films advertising at this year's Superbowl include The Pacifier (I cannot believe they're spending Superbowl money on this one) |
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| Other films advertising at this year's Superbowl include The Pacifier (I cannot believe they're spending Superbowl money on this one) |
|
Originally Posted by Ken Savage
I think he does, i dont think he will deviate to much from the end of the book. I think he has reached the stage of his carreer where he can do whatever he likes and the studio execs will go "sure here is some more money".
|
|
Originally Posted by JuddL
That ending may have been ok for Wells, way back when the story was originally written, I do not think it would be ok today; unless, of course, there's more to it than that.
|
|
Originally Posted by Trinity'sGusset
Because we are smarter now than we were back then?
|
|
Originally Posted by devincf
Since I keep hearing they have no ending yet, I think Spielberg is struggling with just this question.
|
|
Originally Posted by Trinity'sGusset
"they're already here" could mean nothing more than that he is skipping the first act of most alien invasion movies.
the first scene could be everyone waking up to find the aliens are already fortified, rather than 30 odd minutes of normality while things very slowly become strange. that would speed things up a bit. characters would be introduced while already under duress rather than reading the morning paper. that's probably just wishful thinking. So 'no-one knows' is probably the answer, or perhaps 'it's just marketing'. |
|
Originally Posted by L7 Productions
No sound at work, but the visuals of the interstate flying up into the air are pretty spectacular.
|
|
Originally Posted by OhioJones
I agree. Awesome effects. Although I bet those aren't finished - The way the bridge was braking apart makes me thing in the final movie we'll see some explosions or alien ships there.
|
|
Originally Posted by 11thIndian
Perhaps not. It looks like the bridge is being torn apart by an invisible force, and not explosions per-se. I'd like to see alien weapons that aren't big lasers. Perhaps something sonic, magnetic, or gravity based would be an interesting change from the standard destructive visuals. Sure, there'd be explosions as gas lines or tanker trucks went up, but I think the destruction looks pretty convincing as it is...
|

|
Originally Posted by Darth_Chocula
![]() I never read the book, so why is the tagline "They're already here?" Nice artwork. |
|
Originally Posted by cognizant
That Superbowl trailer was badly edited or something, maybe it was the music badly edited, or something, but it just felt very rushed together. The music itself was awesome, from Immediate Music I think. Anyway, point of this post: You think a few effects were rubbed out from this teaser or they're still not completed? Because I couldnt tell why that freeway was being destroyed, I went frame by frame and saw tiny bits of light shining on the surface before they erupted, but thats not good enough is it!?
|
|
Originally Posted by Trinity'sGusset
but do you not think that having the souce of destruction be invisible might be an interesting cinematic conceit? And do you not think that, since AI and his dalliance with Kubrick, Spielberg has very self-consciously been trying to do different things with the thriller and sci-fi genre? Do you not think that this would be a very Speilbergian way to mix the visual language of Sci-fi destruction up a little bit - that taking away stuff might actually give us more? Specifically taking away the audience's safety of knowing what's going to get hit next?
|
|
Originally Posted by Trinity'sGusset
So we have two teaser trailers both showing destruction happening by surprise, with no visual precursor, with no warning. yet you still believe that it's only because they have yet to add some whizzy laser death rays to the shots?
I guess we will all find out in a few months, but do you not think that having the souce of destruction be invisible might be an interesting cinematic conceit? And do you not think that, since AI and his dalliance with Kubrick, Spielberg has very self-consciously been trying to do different things with the thriller and sci-fi genre? Do you not think that this would be a very Speilbergian way to mix the visual language of Sci-fi destruction up a little bit - that taking away stuff might actually give us more? Specifically taking away the audience's safety of knowing what's going to get hit next? Just an idea. We don't have that long to wait. |
|
Originally Posted by OhioJones
I think you're giving him too much credit. He's not going to try and "mix it up a bit" in an effort to be like the late great Kubrick. (I don't remember AI being a huge hit, do you?) You think he'd fuck around with your standard invasion story with a huge star like Tom Cruise for a "new idea"? Doubt it. This movie was made to make a ton of money, and that's what it's going to do. It's a summer movie; a tent pole popcorn picture and that's what he's going to deliver.
|
|
Originally Posted by dudalb
After seeing the super trailer, with it's wave of destruction, My though was "Did'nt we see this film a few years ago but it was called Independence Day?"
Sorry, but whether the cause of the wave of destruction is visible or not is really quibbling. We saw it in ID4, and my hopes of a halfway original take on an Alien Invasion has just got down.Just too similiar, Steve, just too similiar. |