CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › What frightens you more... Paranormal vs Reality horror
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What frightens you more... Paranormal vs Reality horror

post #1 of 13
Thread Starter 
First I. So what scares you the most? If you part horror movies in some genres >

1. Paranormal Activity, like haunting houses in Amityville or things like Poltergeist, moving objects, bleeding walls and stuff.

2. kinda "Realistic" human serial killers, like Halloween or Saw

3. Ghost stories, like The Grudge or The Ring

4. Scary visions, like Jack's in The Shining, creepy stuff

5. Monster flicks, like Jeepers Creepers,

6. Redneck flicks, like Wrong Turn, Deliverance, Texas Chainsaw Massacre

7. Animal flicks, like Jaws and afficinados (or Boa Vs Python aargh)

Second II. And then, what kind of horror location makes you more cringe. Local places like the own house, the school, workplace, train station and other typical places you see everyday - or places people normally aren't that often, like caves, woods, etc. ?


To me, the more realistic the happenings in the movie feel, the scarier the flick is. If the movie deals with a spaceship or stuff, it often distracts from the "this could happen" feel you have e.g. during Jaws. Swimming in the water night, well a shark could bite you, that's nothing too far. But I'm not that often in super scary looking houses, or redneck areas, so I can't find myself that often in flicks like Wrong Turn. It feels too.. fictional.
post #2 of 13
GOOD paranormal stories (RINGU, A TALE OF TWO SISTERS, THE EXORCIST) scare me to hell, even though I have no real belief system to base them on. Then again, movies like THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE are utterly frightening because of the twisted side of humanity they focus on. Especially since that's based partly on real things.

Also, once you've been attacked in your own home, any idea you have about location goes out of the window. That's what's scary, that it's no longer the big scary house on the corner that is the domain of fear, it's your own house.
post #3 of 13
I guess for me it could be any of those depending on how successful the filmmaker was in getting the fear onto the screen.

Ju-On: The Grudge definitely had some chilly, dread filled scenes that got to me. So did the end of Blair Witch Project, which ramped it all up quite nicely.

As far as reality based fear, I don't get that out of films like Halloween. But say something like Blue Velvet and to a lesser extent a movie like Parents had a tension that made you afraid for the characters as you had no doubt about how bad discovery would be in certain scenes.

But if I had to pick one genre based on a film that delivered the best scares, I would have to pick paranormal as Ju On had me in its grip pretty good almost all the way through.
post #4 of 13
I'll go with number 4, scary visions and creepy stuff. I like movies that have that feverish nightmare quality to them, like the sort of things you dream when you are really really sick.

So therefore movies like Audition, The Shining, The Ring/Ringu, and The Exorcist have all managed to keep me up at night.
post #5 of 13
I'll take paranormal. When the horror involves a "real" antagonist, I can always say "Well, I'd just pick up a gun and blast that bastard." Harder to say when killer/monster or what have you is immaterial.

Although, why take special shots at Boa vs. Python? It was brilliant! Especially the scene where the naked woman with the enormous snake tattoo on her back screams at Broddick for putting a snake near her, because he "knows that she's terrified of snakes." Hence the tattoo?
post #6 of 13
I like paranormal activity / ghost stories better. Supernatural elements give movies a plus, maybe not because they make the movie scarier but mostly because of the escape it provides.

As for locations, I'd say regular places - house, workplace, everyday stuff - are scarier. But I also like weirder settings; as I said being scared is not especially the first thing I look for. I wouldn't mind if there were more historical horror movies, or if they weren't always set in the US / contemporary Eastern world.
post #7 of 13
I had to give this one a little thought before I replied but as I thought back to the movies that genuinely scared me they have all been been of the supernatural vein. Wether it's an empty resort in The Shining, possesion in The Exorcist, evil woods and cabin in The Evil Dead or a witch on the loose in The Blair Witch Project the supernatural is everywhere and can attack at any moment. As for locations I think JC knows best with anything that is confining and clausterphobic which if filmed right could be absolutely anything.
post #8 of 13
I think that most horror comes from a fear of losing control and being victimized .... Now, a really terrifying branch of this is not simply being chased, but agonizing with the aftereffects ....

For example, possession is scary because a person is taken over, and they are no longer able to control any aspect of their former being ie. speaking in different voices, etc ........... and this also can be related and compared to mental illness as is the case of someone like Norman Bates or Mrs Vorhees or Asami: these characters can appear quite normal, even docile in their calm state .... it is the inner monster that is truly frightening ..........

So for me, the lone maniac w/ a split personality is very similar to the possessed person, both of which are most frightening .......


mild spoiler regarding SISTERS ahead



In thinking about this, I am reminded of the truly disturbing and scarring scene in DePalma'sSISTERS in which Margot Kidder murders her first victim ... That scene to me was really effective and very scary .....
post #9 of 13
Ghost stories get me the most, for sure, no doubt about it. From Bava's Black Sabbath to JU-ON: THE GRUDGE 1 and 2 to THE EYE. Ghosts scare me.
post #10 of 13
I think in order for any horror movie to work there has to be something that relates to a real world fear. For instance, Rosemary's Baby -- women probably don't have to worry about their husband selling their child's soul to the devil for fame and fortune, but everyone who is an expectant parent really just hopes their baby will be healthy, with all the parts that are supposed to be there intact. And the fear that your child might come out messed up is what the movie is really using to get to the viewer.

Or The Fly (the Cronenberg version), working on the fear that someone you love is changing into something or someone you can no longer recognize. Stephen King calls these "mortal dreads", and that's what makes a horror story work.

And as for places, I think a good horror film should be somewhat claustrophobic, because that's another part of what feeds the fear. Horror films operate on dream logic, and most of your scariest dreams are ones in which you can't escape the thing that's messing with you in the dream. So the tighter the space, the more effective the horror.
post #11 of 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgzilla67
I think in order for any horror movie to work there has to be something that relates to a real world fear. For instance, Rosemary's Baby -- women probably don't have to worry about their husband selling their child's soul to the devil for fame and fortune, but everyone who is an expectant parent really just hopes their baby will be healthy, with all the parts that are supposed to be there intact. And the fear that your child might come out messed up is what the movie is really using to get to the viewer.

Or The Fly (the Cronenberg version), working on the fear that someone you love is changing into something or someone you can no longer recognize. Stephen King calls these "mortal dreads", and that's what makes a horror story work.

And as for places, I think a good horror film should be somewhat claustrophobic, because that's another part of what feeds the fear. Horror films operate on dream logic, and most of your scariest dreams are ones in which you can't escape the thing that's messing with you in the dream. So the tighter the space, the more effective the horror.
I agree completely. Real world fears, "mortal dread", and/or claustrophobia can probably be found at the core of any horror story.

I would say that while I enjoy watching all types of horror films, the ones that get to me the most are of the paranormal/religious horror kind. While not a very religious person myself, I do find the idea of being stalked by or possessed by the "forces of evil" to be disconcerting. That and the imagery tends to be creepier, which is the real point when it comes to horror films anyway. While a killer or animal can be "scary" depending on the film, there is always a way to escape it and kill it (until it makes money, at which time its resurrected for another go around). Paranormal things aren't as easily escaped or stopped.

Aside from that there is only one thing that scares me: Ventriloquist dummies. I don't know why, but they freak me out. I always imagine them coming alive and stalking me with a creepy voice.
post #12 of 13
Quote:
Aside from that there is only one thing that scares me: Ventriloquist dummies. I don't know why, but they freak me out. I always imagine them coming alive and stalking me with a creepy voice.
That's kind of funny cuz my wife and I just stayed at my mom's house recently. In the room we stayed in was on old W.C. Fields ventriloquist dummy in the corner. My wife insisted on throwing a blanket over it while we slept.

I've given up doing the scary voice in the dark at this point in our relationship. She gets PISSED!
post #13 of 13
Ventriloquist Dummies are no laughing matter. Ask Anthony Hopkins, he knows what I'm talking about.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Creature Corner Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › What frightens you more... Paranormal vs Reality horror