I'll step in and try to defend some of the movies on that list . . .
Summer of Fear (aka Strangers in Our House), Chiller, and Invitation to Hell were TV movies, if I'm not misaken. They shouldn't be compared to A Nightmare on Elm Street or Scream. I haven't seen Invitation to Hell, but I've seen those other two TV movies; and for TV movies, they're not bad. Not great, but not bad. They're simply average. (Note: Night Visions was TV work, too, but I haven't seen it . . .)
I'm only vaguely remembering Vampire in Brooklyn, but I seem to remember it being more comedy that horror. I don't think Casebusters is really horror, either.
I've been meaning to see Deadly Friend And Deadly Blessing, so I cannot comment on them. As for Shocker, it was certainly a misfire. I personally enjoyed it as an interesting rip-off of his own A Nightmare on Elm Street. It's a fun "B" movie, but I'm biased because I grew up with--and loved-- A Nightmare on Elm Street, and I'll always give Craven at least a chance because of it. Now, to Cursed: I saw it and I didn't like it. I laughed at some dumb things here and there. Although it wasn't good, it wasn't painful for me to watch. (Maybe that's because I saw it right after seeing Boogeyman, which was torture.)
I look at Craven's The Last House on the Left, The Hills Have Eyes, A Nightmare on Elm Street, New Nightmare, and Scream (the first one is good), and I cannot help but at least wish for the best for his movies and give them a chance. You cannot deny his impact. Compared to a lot of other directors in horror, he can be included as being a "masster of terror." At least at one time . . . and, people, it's possible he can make a good horror movie again--New Nightmare being an example.
