Quote:
|
Originally Posted by myPandaNY
10 years ago.. so you're throwing the hat of most powerful director in hollywood on a guy who filmed a movie 10 years ago that didn't make budget in theatres (US, since thats the one that counts in Hollywood) and happend to have followed it up with The Lord of the Ring Trilogy. wait... he made Frighteners also which... also didn't make budget.
|
I dunno 'bout "most powerful"... but
LotR collectively earned about a billion dollars worldwide, which is more than you can say for anything Spielberg's directed in a good long time. I have no doubt that Spielberg could probably buy Jackson and the whole of New Zealand if he so chose, but that wasn't the point I was trying to make.
Quote:
| Ok, it is of my opinion that you do not have all the facts of what Speilberg has done between ET & Schindlers List |
Oh, please. I grew up in the '80s; I have seen or heard of every project you mention. To wit:
Indiana Jones & the Temple of Doom -- Utter shit, inferior in every way to the original. The beginning of the weird "daddy complex" that's hijacked just about every movie he's done since.
Amazing Stories -- Total shit. See my post above.
The Color Purple, only won a couple of awards -- Watered down, sentimentalized adaptation of the Alice Walker novel.
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- More of the "daddy complex." Connery descends into self-parody, and the
Jeopardy sketch on
SNL is embryonically formed in Will Ferrell's imagination.
Always -- Spirit-free remake of
A Guy Named Joe. Stars Brad Johnson, The Amazing Human Log.
Jurassic Park -- Cynical, kid-friendly fare. Should have been the
Jaws/
Alien of its era.
Poltergeist -- A vastly underrated movie, but it falls under the pre-
E.T./Drank the Kool-Aid era Spielberg.
Gremlins -- Really not all that great. The sequel's better.
The Goonies -- Even as a thirteen-year-old, failed to see the point.
Back to the Future (all 3) -- Would've liked to have seen Zemeckis and Gale's original, R-rated treatment.
Young Sherlock Holmes -- Shit.
The Money Pit -- Shit pit.
An American Tail -- Candy-ass
Maus rip-off. Spielberg owes Art Spiegelman royalties.
Who Framed Roger Rabbit -- A fine film.
The Land Before Time -- Landfill.
Always -- See above.
Joe Versus the Volcano -- Great movie, but little understood.
Arachnophobia -- Well, the Northern Californian scenery is lovely.
Cape Fear (with Nolte & DeNiro) -- Crummy remake of a good thriller, the beginning of Scorsese's decline into post-
GoodFellas irrelevance.
Animaniacs (started the boom of anmiation, before that it was mostly japanese imports or rip offs ala transformers, voltron, ThunderCats et al... exception of the Smurfs) -- Actually,
Tiny Toons came first. Both are overrated and their fanbase is terrifying.
The Simpsons did more for animation than either
Toons or
Animaniacs, or for that matter,
Family Dog. (See? I told you I grew up with this shit!)
Quote:
| I'll even throw in SeaQuestDSV, Since Peter Deluise was on there and got his feet wet in Sci-Fi and sprung board him as a one of the creative minds behind Stargate SG1. |
Both are absolute pieces of shit that display a retarded kitten's understanding of science fiction. Your point?
Quote:
| So far as the ones you selected, like I said, they pushed the nut. I think they're great movies and they are some of my favorites but to each their own. |
Yes, it's fair to say that many of these movies push my nut. But not in the way you mean.
Quote:
| I think James Cameron would have been a good choice but that was 10 years ago... |
Cameron has become a Hughesian control freak. He forfeited Heaven with the misogynistic shitpile that was
True Lies.
Quote:
| Don't get me wrong, I was not the biggest fan of Minority Report or AI or but they're still good movies. I just think Speilberg does better with his own vision and not someone elses. |
Even
A.I. is better than the bland and undistinguished movies he made in the '90s.